Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2009, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,968,624 times
Reputation: 36644

Advertisements

(I posted this in another discussion forum, but thought it might be an interesting topic here.)

The Christ that is followed by Christians, in my view, had little but contempt for Old Testament morality. Jesus Christ was a man who taught peace and love. He referenced the OT for no other reason than, firstly, to support his belief in the almighty creator, an secondly, to acknowledge that basic principles of morality were self evident, even to the ancients.

I think that any Christian who uncritically follows the teachings of the OT is not being a Christian at all, and most of Christ's life, he fought against the cruelty and injustice of the OT and its fallacious man-made admonitions.

Jesus would have been meaningless if all he had done was to rally the people Fred Phelps-like to the prevailing OT dogma. Instead he taught a new morality of peace and love, which a true Christian would honor.

What, then, is the relevance of a literal interpretation of the Old Testament in the character of the religion of Jesus Christ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2009, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Somewhere Out West
2,287 posts, read 2,587,871 times
Reputation: 1956
Persecute homosexuals?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 12:01 PM
 
22,165 posts, read 19,217,049 times
Reputation: 18295
i am not a christian, but the christians in my life who share quite vocally on this very topic say vehemently that it's "all" the word of god, both the OT and the NT, and one can't be studied without the other, or it is tantamount to discarding the word of God. that's what they tell me

bear in mind that Jesus did not come to earth to start a new religion, nor did he come to earth to be worshipped as a god. he came as a human (a Jew) showing people how to be in relationship with god.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
If you ask most Christians if they believe the whole bible is the "Word of God", they'll usually answer yes. Thats the old and new testament, not one or the other.

If you bring up the contradictions between the old and the new, and some of the more bloody and controversial portions of the old testament, they'll answer, "Well that was before Jesus." Meaning that Abraham and God had a covenant, that was in the old testament. Jesus created a new covenant between man and God, allowing anyone to be saved and get into heaven. It also means that you don't have to follow the old rules like, eating pork, killing homosexuals, and not working on the Sabbath, just to name a few.

But I don't think you can have it both ways. When Jesus was asked about the old testament rules, his response was, "You know my fathers laws." He didn't specify which ones, and most Christians believe he was talking about the ten commandments, but he never mentioned them by name. I personally believe you are either all in, you either believe every word is the actual word of God, or you then open things up to a greater debate, what is the word of God.

You can't have it both ways. If all of the bible isn't the word of God, and it clearly isn't, then what is his word? I think that is a decision each person should make for themselves, and not given to the followers by any organized religion. Your relationship with God is yours, no Pope, no Preist, no Pastor, no parent should tell you who or what to believe. If someone wants to believe that homosexuals are bad, because of the old testament, thats fine. However, they shouldn't look down on other Christians because they don't buy that "law".

Is your God a loving God, or is he the childish, insecure, bloody, tyrannical God of the old testament? The choice I say, is up to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 12:39 PM
 
Location: South Africa
1,317 posts, read 2,055,710 times
Reputation: 299
Dunno, did OT say the "sinner's prayer"? Did OT join the church of the true believers(rm)?

If not, then OT is not a true xian(tm)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 01:29 PM
 
Location: East Coast U.S.
1,513 posts, read 1,624,420 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
(I posted this in another discussion forum, but thought it might be an interesting topic here.)

The Christ that is followed by Christians, in my view, had little but contempt for Old Testament morality. Jesus Christ was a man who taught peace and love. He referenced the OT for no other reason than, firstly, to support his belief in the almighty creator, an secondly, to acknowledge that basic principles of morality were self evident, even to the ancients.

I think that any Christian who uncritically follows the teachings of the OT is not being a Christian at all, and most of Christ's life, he fought against the cruelty and injustice of the OT and its fallacious man-made admonitions.

Jesus would have been meaningless if all he had done was to rally the people Fred Phelps-like to the prevailing OT dogma. Instead he taught a new morality of peace and love, which a true Christian would honor.

What, then, is the relevance of a literal interpretation of the Old Testament in the character of the religion of Jesus Christ?
You asked the question and then answered it.

What is your reason for asserting that the teachings of Jesus contradict the OT? Any specific examples?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
You asked the question and then answered it.

What is your reason for asserting that the teachings of Jesus contradict the OT? Any specific examples?
Other then the fact that Jesus taught that even the gentiles and Romans could be saved, and the OT says that only Jews are Gods chosen people?

I'd say thats the major divergence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 04:17 PM
 
Location: East Coast U.S.
1,513 posts, read 1,624,420 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Other then the fact that Jesus taught that even the gentiles and Romans could be saved, and the OT says that only Jews are Gods chosen people?

I'd say thats the major divergence.
...and what about Rehab the prostitute and Ruth the Moabite?

There were also instructions concerning how non-Jews could become converts to Judaism.

Where is the "major" divergence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
...and what about Rehab the prostitute and Ruth the Moabite?

There were also instructions concerning how non-Jews could become converts to Judaism.

Where is the "major" divergence?
Gentiles were never allowed to become Jewish. You had to be born Jewish in the old testament. You could allow some people to join the Jewish camp, but they had to be from the house of Abraham to do that.

Romans, were not of the house of Abraham. They could not be saved, according to the bible.

Not to mention the fact that according to Jesus, all you have to do is ask forgiveness, and before that, you had to pay tribute in the form of sacrafice to God for forgiveness. Either by means of gold or a sacrifical animal of some type.

Those are major changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2009, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
Not to mention Matthew 5 38-39, where Jesus flat contradicts the "eye for an eye" law, which is supposidly directly from God.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top