Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2007, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Between Here and There
3,684 posts, read 11,815,454 times
Reputation: 1689

Advertisements

Other than the Catholic Church which other churches believe the host and wine are transformed into the body and blood of Christ? Which disagree?

Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2007, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Maine
22,920 posts, read 28,268,441 times
Reputation: 31239
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishmom View Post
Other than the Catholic Church which other churches believe the host and wine are transformed into the body and blood of Christ?
All of the Orthodox Churches believe this. (Roman Catholic, Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, etc.)

All of the others...pretty much not, although I believe some of the more conservative Anglican communions might.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Central Florida
1,408 posts, read 5,096,099 times
Reputation: 874
Because I'd heard a Lutheran minister on TV Sunday night, I looked up what they believe. And at least this branch of the Lutherans believe the same way as Catholics on the sacraments (I think)...

From the Evangelical Lutheran Synod website:

We hold with Luther that "[the Sacrament of the Altar instituted by Christ himself] is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, under the bread and wine, given to us Christians to eat and to drink." (SC VI, pp. 351)

Is this the same as the Catholic belief?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Between Here and There
3,684 posts, read 11,815,454 times
Reputation: 1689
Quote:
Originally Posted by FL_TN_Nana View Post
Because I'd heard a Lutheran minister on TV Sunday night, I looked up what they believe. And at least this branch of the Lutherans believe the same way as Catholics on the sacraments (I think)...

From the Evangelical Lutheran Synod website:

We hold with Luther that "[the Sacrament of the Altar instituted by Christ himself] is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, under the bread and wine, given to us Christians to eat and to drink." (SC VI, pp. 351)

Is this the same as the Catholic belief?
My understanding is yes that would be the same. I am wondering why others don't think this. Do you know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 10:03 AM
 
2,970 posts, read 2,258,745 times
Reputation: 658
Communion is symbolic . "This do in remembrance of me" It is representative of the body and the blood of Christ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Maine
22,920 posts, read 28,268,441 times
Reputation: 31239
Quote:
Originally Posted by spunky1 View Post
Communion is symbolic . "This do in remembrance of me" It is representative of the body and the blood of Christ.
But Jesus said, "This is my body..." He did not say, "This is symbolic and representative of my body..."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 10:33 AM
 
2,970 posts, read 2,258,745 times
Reputation: 658
This is one of those things that I ask; does this realy matter. I mean is it going to in the end determine if ones is a Christian or not? If one goes to Heaven or not? I think not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 10:43 AM
 
7,784 posts, read 14,886,977 times
Reputation: 3478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark S. View Post
But Jesus said, "This is my body..." He did not say, "This is symbolic and representative of my body..."
That's a good point, I've actually heard and believe myself that it is both.

That the elements of communion are as much flesh and blood as they were on the evening of The Last Supper.

<I also agree with Spunky in that this is one of those issues that we talk about over coffee. It's in no way tied to salvation.>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Miami, Fl
208 posts, read 507,284 times
Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by spunky1 View Post
Communion is symbolic . "This do in remembrance of me" It is representative of the body and the blood of Christ.
No way is Communion symbolic. This is not MY opinion, this is what Jesus said.

"‘I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’" (John 6:51–52).

His listeners were stupefied because now they understood Jesus literally—and correctly. He again repeated his words, but with even greater emphasis, and introduced the statement about drinking his blood: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him" (John 6:53–56).

Christ in the Eucharist (broken link)

Jesus Christ is Risen, He is Risen Indeed !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2007, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Central Florida
1,408 posts, read 5,096,099 times
Reputation: 874
I think the following commentary voices my belief on the Lord's Supper:

From a commentary on Matthew 26:26: And said, take, eat, this is my body; in Luke it is added, "which is given for you", Luk_22:19; that is, unto death, as a sacrifice for sin; and by the Apostle Paul, 1Co_11:24, "which is broken for you"; as that bread then was, and so expressive of his wounds, bruises, sufferings, and death, for them. Now when he says, "this is my body", he cannot mean, that that bread was his real body; or that it was changed and converted into the very substance of his body; but that it was an emblem and representation of his body, which was just ready to be offered up, once for all: in like manner, as the Jews in the eating of their passover used to say (r) of the unleavened bread,

הא לחמא דעניא, this is "the bread of affliction", which our fathers ate in the land of Egypt.
Not that they thought that was the selfsame bread, but that it resembled it, and was a representation of the affliction and distress their fathers were in at that time: ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top