Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-29-2010, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,495 posts, read 36,978,256 times
Reputation: 13965

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Campbell34 View Post
New study to consider link below.

Deep waters
New study? A report by Lou Bergeron from 1997 is not new, nor is it a study. This like everything else you have posted and re-posted has been refuted...I swear your memory must be failing you.

 
Old 05-29-2010, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there
9,616 posts, read 12,872,336 times
Reputation: 3767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Campbell34 View Post
They are finding underwater cities around the globe. It should be obvious the crust of the earth collapsed. The Biblical account is clear and needs no interpretation. The latest city was discovered by a French team just in 2009. Consider the link below. Clearly you really have to continue looking the other way, to ignore this kind of evidence.

Team Claims Ancient Underwater City in Caribbean
A latest city "discovered"? Absolutely? "They are finding underwater cities around the globe"???? Really? Links please, to absolute, validated finds, not speculation and requests for funding based on really bad fuzzy photos that, in fact, show no such thing.

(Hmmm... somehow this reminds me of the current Ark expedition.... Hmm...).

Vast, monumental over-reaching on all your conclusions, all the time. With nary a cautious bone in your head.

Class dismissed.
 
Old 05-29-2010, 01:22 PM
 
1,883 posts, read 2,985,685 times
Reputation: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Campbell34 View Post
They are finding underwater cities around the globe. It should be obvious, the crust of the earth collapsed. The Biblical account is clear and needs no interpretation. The fact is, the BIBLE has always given us an accurate historical account. Yet you want to come up with your own facts which have little to do with Biblical, or historical reality. The real joke, is how so many can ignore such evidence and pretend it does not exist. What is a city doing a half a mile below the ocean in the case of the Cuban discovery? Consider the links below.


Japan's Underwater Ruins (http://members.toast.net/rjspina/Japan's%20Underwater%20Ruins.htm - broken link)

Ancient Underwater City Found Off India: Discovery in Bay of Cambay Will Force Western Archaeologists to Rewrite History

Underwater City Off Cuba
So now the supposed findings of Atlantis nutjob explorers is used to support Noah's Ark?

*sigh* (there really should be an icon of a person throwing their hands up in the air in disbelief)

Whatever.I am done trying to talk rationally with someone with your mindset.Have a nice life in fantasyland.
 
Old 05-29-2010, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,495 posts, read 36,978,256 times
Reputation: 13965
This from your link Campbell....

STOP THE PRESSES! NEW EVIDENCE THIS IS A HOAX!

It appears the team was serious about getting funds for their expedition -- to the Riviera!

What is it about people these days who do things like this? It started in 2001 with the Zelitsky expedition which resulted in an arrest and extradition... then we had the alleged Bigfoot Body... The motive is always the same -- greed.

Here, some artifacts appear in the digital processing of google earth photographs. Add some clouds and atmospheric effects in PhotoShop and -- viola -- set real science back a decade or so. But wait! Just in... an underground city has been found in a shallow lake in Yellowstone Park.
 
Old 05-29-2010, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,793,132 times
Reputation: 2879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Campbell34 View Post
This volume of water, (is now unavailable). Yet there was a time I believe it was. Clearly, Scripture tells us the waters did go down. And Scripture tells us, the Ark landed on the top of Mt. Ararat, and it took another two and a half months (until the tops of the other mountains were seen). Based on that, we can assume the waters leached back into the earth at a rate of about 2 to 4 inches per hour, over a period of two and a half months.
Hmmm! My maths aren't too good but let's see.

The waters covered the highest mountains...which would be Everest.

Everest is 20,029ft = 348,348 inches.
The waters receded at 2-4 inches per hour..lets say 3 inches as an average.

Divide 348,348 inches by 3 (inches per hour) = 116,116 hours.
116,116 hours divide by 24 for days is 4,838 days.
4,838 days is 691 weeks.
691 weeks is 172 months
172 months is 14 years

....yet you Tom, say all this water was absorbed in 2.5 months???
Someone check my figures please!! If they are correct then......

Aaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha!!
 
Old 05-29-2010, 02:12 PM
 
7,628 posts, read 10,944,554 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
New study? A report by Lou Bergeron from 1997 is not new, nor is it a study. This like everything else you have posted and re-posted has been refuted...I swear your memory must be failing you.
Talk is cheap sanspeur, can you show us the post where it has been refuted? You guys always say things have been refuted, yet somehow you never get around to posting such a link. WHY IS THAT?
 
Old 05-29-2010, 02:17 PM
 
7,628 posts, read 10,944,554 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
Hmmm! My maths aren't too good but let's see.

The waters covered the highest mountains...which would be Everest.

Everest is 20,029ft = 348,348 inches.
The waters receded at 2-4 inches per hour..lets say 3 inches as an average.

Divide 348,348 inches by 3 (inches per hour) = 116,116 hours.
116,116 hours divide by 24 for days is 4,838 days.
4,838 days is 691 weeks.
691 weeks is 172 months
172 months is 14 years

....yet you Tom, say all this water was absorbed in 2.5 months???
Someone check my figures please!! If they are correct then......

Aaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha!!




It's not your math that is bad, I believe it is your comprehension. The Ark landed on Mt. Ararat, not on Mt. Everest. Try doing the math starting with the right mountain. LOL And the distance was from the top of Mt. Ararat until the (TOPS) of the other mountains were seen.
So we are most likely speaking about a distance of seven to eight thousand feet.
 
Old 05-29-2010, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Metromess
11,798 posts, read 25,081,924 times
Reputation: 5219
Rafius, Everest is actually 9000 feet higher than you stated. As I recall, Mt Ararat is about 12 or 13 thousand feet lower than Everest.

Not that it matters in this discussion, for many reasons already given for the ludicrous nature of the myth.
 
Old 05-29-2010, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,495 posts, read 36,978,256 times
Reputation: 13965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Campbell34 View Post
Talk is cheap sanspeur, can you show us the post where it has been refuted? You guys always say things have been refuted, yet somehow you never get around to posting such a link. WHY IS THAT?
That confirms it....Your memory is shot.
 
Old 05-29-2010, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,793,132 times
Reputation: 2879
Quote:
Originally Posted by catman View Post
Rafius, Everest is actually 9000 feet higher than you stated.
Correct! Typo. I got the inches right..343,348 inches is 29,029.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top