Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2015, 03:31 PM
 
3,461 posts, read 4,661,160 times
Reputation: 4032

Advertisements

Then why wouldn't you be able to charge for painting if you can charge for carpet cleaning if, as you say, you are able to 'restore to original condition'? Makes no sense.

And some of the things you mentioned are damage, not normal wear and tear. Like 'diarrhea on carpet' or 'poo in the toilets'. Those all make sense to be able to charge for.

It would be interesting to know how fair the judges are in CA when interpreting their statutes regarding normal wear and tear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2015, 03:34 PM
 
3,461 posts, read 4,661,160 times
Reputation: 4032
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ Manager View Post
That's not what it says, it says you can restore the unit to what it was on day one minus normal wear and tear. If they left some dirt and it needs vacuumed but instead you choose to have the carpet steam clean and charge them you are wrong. You really should get a second opinion because the cost to you if it is taken to court could be huge, withheld deposits times 3, in CA I think someone said its 3, plus their legal fees and your own if you loose, and I'm sure you will.
I said that but that was in WI where I reside. I have no idea if that is what CA does or would do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 03:47 PM
 
3,461 posts, read 4,661,160 times
Reputation: 4032
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ Manager View Post
That's not what it says, it says you can restore the unit to what it was on day one minus normal wear and tear. If they left some dirt and it needs vacuumed but instead you choose to have the carpet steam clean and charge them you are wrong. You really should get a second opinion because the cost to you if it is taken to court could be huge, withheld deposits times 3, in CA I think someone said its 3, plus their legal fees and your own if you loose, and I'm sure you will.

Okay, I did find the penalties so above is correct PLUS much more!:
California Tenant Law - Non-profit legal advice for California renters' rights
You can get your deposit back by suing in small claims court. If the landlord misses the 21 day deadline, he forfeits the right to deduct anything. If he keeps the money in bad faith, you can sue for up to 3 times the amount of the deposit. The process is quick, easy, and inexpensive. While you're at it, you can sue your landlord for other things, like breach of contract, nuisance, trespass, retaliation, fraud, unfair business practices, and more. The maximum in small claims court is now $10,000, and each person can sue separately for that amount.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,296,465 times
Reputation: 38564
Ultrarunner brought up the California clincher in this story. If you did not include in your initial move-out inspection that the tenant had to steam clean the carpets, then you can't charge for it.

In fact, if you didn't do the initial inspection properly, including a written notice with their rights, etc., if they take you to court, you will have to give them all of their deposit back, and pay their court costs, too.

I've helped my daughter do this twice. Of course, most tenants don't fight their security deposit deductions. But, if you want to be doing things by the book, you need to do that pre-move-out inspection properly. And you can only later charge them for things that were on that list that they didn't do, or for damage you couldn't see during the inspection or happened after the inspection.

Scroll down to the blue section:

California Tenants - California Department of Consumer Affairs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 03:59 PM
 
28,107 posts, read 63,432,187 times
Reputation: 23222
Yes... the 21 day rule has been statute for a long time.

Return of Deposit and/or Accounting for monies withheld.

I've helped several friends get the full return of Deposit simply because the 21 days had come and gone... none were able to get treble damages because bad faith could not be proven.

Several times it was management changes or the tenant moved without a good forwarding address, etc.

I do think it is important to point out... landlords have returned all money due and later pursued tenants for latent damages and won judgments... it simply meant the Landlord had no security deposit remaining/held to deduct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 04:01 PM
 
28,107 posts, read 63,432,187 times
Reputation: 23222
Landlords are held to a higher standard in that they are running a business and are expected to know and follow the law as applicable...

Judges often give tenants more leeway because they are the consumers...

Just the way it is and I don't have a problem with it for anyone in business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,204 posts, read 19,051,260 times
Reputation: 38266
It's always interesting to see what landlords consider reasonable. My last rental was in a large apartment building with onsite management. They kept the public areas clean all the time, and were pretty responsive responding to repair requests.

When I moved out, I did what I considered the basics - threw out all of my trash, wipes off counters, vacuumed/swept the floors. I did not steam clean the carpets, and I didn't do any extra cleaning beyond whenever I had last cleaned the bathroom, etc. I got a check for 100% of my deposit along with a note thanking me for returning the unit in such good condition. I've always wondered what other units looked like at move out because I thought I had done the normal amount you had to do. In my other rental experiences, I always had roommates who stayed on after I left, so I was never turning a unit back over to a landlord.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,296,465 times
Reputation: 38564
Good point. I always pay someone to clean my apartment when I leave. I do this mainly so if I have to, I can show a receipt showing I paid to have the place cleaned. Also, moving is so exhausting, who has the energy to detail the apartment, too? I've always gotten my full deposits back, too. Sometimes I've had to fight for it, but usually, they are happy to get a professionally cleaned unit back. And I never damage anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 05:23 PM
 
Location: los angeles county
1,763 posts, read 2,036,176 times
Reputation: 1877
Another CA landlord/tenant attorney has responded to my question.

His response.....

Quote:
The line is very clear. You have a duty to return the unit at the same original condition. That includes cleaning, and includes the carpet. Cleaning the apartment is part of the tenant's duties, the law is very clear about this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ Manager View Post
That's not what it says, it says you can restore the unit to what it was on day one minus normal wear and tear. If they left some dirt and it needs vacuumed but instead you choose to have the carpet steam clean and charge them you are wrong. You really should get a second opinion because the cost to you if it is taken to court could be huge, withheld deposits times 3, in CA I think someone said its 3, plus their legal fees and your own if you loose, and I'm sure you will.
well of course if it's so light that a vacuum can take it out, I would not charge for it.

But often the stains are set in really good, requiring more than a vacuum.



Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
Ultrarunner brought up the California clincher in this story. If you did not include in your initial move-out inspection that the tenant had to steam clean the carpets, then you can't charge for it.

Here's the difference. If the ONLY thing that can restore the carpet to original cleanliness is a steam cleaning, then you CAN charge for steam cleaning.

The minimum standard is Whatever it takes, at reasonable cost, to restore it to the condition the tenant got it in.

So if there was a stain on the carpet that wasn't there on day one, and the carpet care guy charged $50, that $50 is coming out of the security.



I will listen to what landlord/tenant attorneys say, not consumer interpretation of the law.



Management companies that do not charge you for cleanliness restoration are either limited by law, or are being nice (and leaving money on the table).

Again, if you moved into steam cleaned carpets, the CONSCIONABLE thing to do is to return it with steam cleaned carpets.


You've lived there for a year or more, is it not reasonable to spend $50 to steam clean an apartment?

Last edited by oh come on!; 05-26-2015 at 05:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,296,465 times
Reputation: 38564
Quote:
Originally Posted by oh come on! View Post
If you got your rental with steam cleaned carpets, you should return your rental with steam cleaned carpets.

Not with a little bit of dirt on top.

Come on man, fair is fair. Don't call it normal wear and tear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oh come on! View Post



well of course if it's so light that a vacuum can take it out, I would not charge for it.

But often the stains are set in really good, requiring more than a vacuum.


I'm confused. Your original post said there was a "little bit of dirt on top."

But, as long as your initial move-out inspection said they needed to steam clean the carpets, you should be legal.

Does your lawyer know about the initial move-out inspection law? Unfortunately, lawyers don't always look up all the laws. He may have missed that one. But, if you did one that included the steam cleaning, or at least gave them the option for one and they waived it in writing, no worries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top