Responsibilities month-to-month move out

[Robino1]

Originally Posted by Lovehound

Not true in AZ and stated in my leases that only persons named upon the lease may live there for any period exceeding 14 days.

I think you have a mistaken idea of "statute of limitations" which generally applies as the period that law enforcement has to bring charges for committing a crime (sometimes based upon the date of the crime, other situations based upon on the date of discovery a crime has been committed).

New York must be a tenant-friendly city or state. AZ is a landlord friendly state. No coincidence my rentals are in AZ. The financials for buying and renting a house in CA make it impossible, mainly due to the high property values and high property taxes. Housing prices in CA are simply unreal!

Some of this discussion could be avoided if the OP had stated which area/locale the property is located in. Laws vary throughout the country. Often if not usually the exact lease or rental contract have major consequences.

But the OP has never seen the original lease and doesn't have a copy.

[Lovehound]

Exactly. Unless I got confused which topic this is, OP might not even be a tenant in terms of the law. Might be able to just move out and wave bye-bye to landlord.

I'm concerned about the landlord too, but if a landlord handles business affairs in a sloppy way then he has only himself to blame.

Not being personally involved, all I can say is if I were the OP I'd just move and take my own stuff, not leave a forwarding address, skip the bye-bye, and maybe take lots of pictures before leaving as protection against possible unjustified (or even justified) damage claims from landlord.

If tenant has been paying rent by check then he can run but he can't hide.

I'm sure glad I'm not the tenant and not the landlord.

[rent.in.nyc]

[quote=Lovehound;45516492]Not true in AZ and stated in my leases that only persons named upon the lease may live there for any period exceeding 14 days.

I think you have a mistaken idea of "statute of limitations" which generally applies as the period that law enforcement has to bring charges for committing a crime (sometimes based upon the date of the crime, other situations based upon on the date of discovery a crime has been committed).

New York must be a tenant-friendly city or state. AZ is a landlord friendly state. No coincidence my rentals are in AZ. The financials for buying and renting a house in CA make it impossible, mainly due to the high property values and high property taxes. Housing prices in CA are simply unreal!

Some of this discussion could be avoided if the OP had stated which area/locale the property is located in. Laws vary throughout the country. Often if not usually the exact lease or rental contract have major consequences.[/QUOTE

--------


The only persons the LL could sue regarding the furniture, no matter what happens to it, are the Original Tenants who had a written lease. Those moved out years ago. So, Statute of Limitation would be expired, in case he wants to sue, whom shall he sue for his stuff.

Tenant should just up and leave! Non-communicative LL. since years.

The only contact the tenant has is the LL's address, no phone, no email, no text, etc...

I think the OP did not only leave the house, but also CD and his thread...:-)))

[rent.in.nyc]

Originally Posted by Lovehound

Exactly. Unless I got confused which topic this is, OP might not even be a tenant in terms of the law. Might be able to just move out and wave bye-bye to landlord.

I'm concerned about the landlord too, but if a landlord handles business affairs in a sloppy way then he has only himself to blame.

Not being personally involved, all I can say is if I were the OP I'd just move and take my own stuff, not leave a forwarding address, skip the bye-bye, and maybe take lots of pictures before leaving as protection against possible unjustified (or even justified) damage claims from landlord.

If tenant has been paying rent by check then he can run but he can't hide.

I'm sure glad I'm not the tenant and not the landlord.

LOL...exactly... nobody can blame anybody!