Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2010, 03:50 PM
 
Location: TX
742 posts, read 2,068,057 times
Reputation: 296

Advertisements

What the f*** is this? Apartments discriminating against people that make more money. There are newly built complexes, not crappy slums. It's total bull****. Are we living in capitalism or socialism?!! Do people forget crime is an economic issue? The lower the income level of a community, the higher the crime rate. I was rejected by one apartment because my income wasn't low enough, and was offered an inflated rental in another apartment again because of my income.

What's the logic behind this? Why are they shutting out people that can actually afford to pay for it?!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2010, 07:15 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, Texas
3,503 posts, read 19,886,388 times
Reputation: 2771
It's called subsidized housing. It's for the slackers who work to get welfare instead of working to stay off of welfare. In my city the leaders built a beautiful complex in an historic area. It's bautiful. It's only for section 8. Let's see how long it takes to become a slum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Marion, IA
2,793 posts, read 6,123,033 times
Reputation: 1613
Behold the Democrat party in action. Aint it great??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2010, 03:31 AM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,654,488 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix_talons View Post
What the f*** is this? Apartments discriminating against people that make more money. There are newly built complexes, not crappy slums. It's total bull****. Are we living in capitalism or socialism?!! Do people forget crime is an economic issue? The lower the income level of a community, the higher the crime rate. I was rejected by one apartment because my income wasn't low enough, and was offered an inflated rental in another apartment again because of my income.

What's the logic behind this? Why are they shutting out people that can actually afford to pay for it?!!!
I'm sure that the rent is tailored to that income.

As far as the snarky comments made by the other poster, people working on minimum wage can afford those places--and some people do only earn minimum wage, and have families to support on it--without welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2010, 08:40 PM
 
73 posts, read 586,853 times
Reputation: 82
Low-income people often have limited options for affordable housing so, personally, I am okay with income restrictions that reserve the low-income housing for the people who NEED low-income housing. I can afford to live somewhere else, but they can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2010, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Illinois
8,534 posts, read 7,403,510 times
Reputation: 14884
Quote:
Originally Posted by zz4guy View Post
Behold the Democrat party in action. Aint it great??!!
Yeah ~~ blame the current administration! Geesh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2010, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Illinois
8,534 posts, read 7,403,510 times
Reputation: 14884
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneSA View Post
It's called subsidized housing. It's for the slackers who work to get welfare instead of working to stay off of welfare. In my city the leaders built a beautiful complex in an historic area. It's bautiful. It's only for section 8. Let's see how long it takes to become a slum.
ShaneSA ~~ the little saying under your nic ~~ you ought to read it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2010, 12:26 PM
 
3 posts, read 12,478 times
Reputation: 18
I live in Maryland just outside DC and I've seen many with moderate incomes, i.e. 40,000+/yr, that couldn't get into decent apartments unless they opted for roommates. There aren't many subsidized apartments in the area but owners of new complexes are required to make a very small portion of their units affordable to those who aren't making over 60,000-70,000+/yr. But they do have to at least be employed and make over 30,000 or so which is way over minimum wage. I would hardly call those that qualify for the more affordable apartments slackers. And they sure as hell aren't thugs packing guns ready to increase a neighborhood's crime rate. They are usually anyone from grad students to teachers to any degree holder with a mid to low income level job. Frankly, they could be any one of the people we interact with. Who the hell knows in an economy where the cost of living gets higher while companies lower starting salaries. Bottom line is that there is an increasingly large group of people who make too much to qualify for welfare/section 8 and make too little to afford good homes in areas with with good schools for their kids. How anyone can judge the situation of such a wide group of people is beyond my understanding. There are so many factors that go into what people can afford these days when it comes to housing.

Last edited by tess89; 04-29-2010 at 01:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2010, 04:03 PM
 
10,746 posts, read 26,018,824 times
Reputation: 16033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneSA View Post
It's called subsidized housing. It's for the slackers who work to get welfare instead of working to stay off of welfare. In my city the leaders built a beautiful complex in an historic area. It's bautiful. It's only for section 8. Let's see how long it takes to become a slum.

Actually it's called Affordable Housing and has nothing to do with welfare.


We have two places here in town that have a percentage of their apartments available as affordable housing. No welfare or Section 8 allowed. The ppl that are applying for these places only make about $12 and hour and need a decent affordable place to live.

And these places are beautiful too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2010, 06:00 AM
 
Location: Illinois
8,534 posts, read 7,403,510 times
Reputation: 14884
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix_talons View Post
What the f*** is this? Apartments discriminating against people that make more money. There are newly built complexes, not crappy slums. It's total bull****. Are we living in capitalism or socialism?!! Do people forget crime is an economic issue? The lower the income level of a community, the higher the crime rate. I was rejected by one apartment because my income wasn't low enough, and was offered an inflated rental in another apartment again because of my income.

What's the logic behind this? Why are they shutting out people that can actually afford to pay for it?!!!

nice to see you change the saying under your name. Good job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top