U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 11-26-2010, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
5,743 posts, read 3,139,265 times
Reputation: 8161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
My father told us "When I die, just put me in a sack and throw me in the river. I'd rather have you spend the money on yourselves than give it to a funeral home." We didn't do that, of course, and spent a lot of money on his funeral. He would not have been at all pleased. So we were just doing what society expected of us, it wasn't really for him, it was for appearances. Over the years I have come to understand his position on many things. Especially about escaping the money traps that are set up for us all through our short lives. I feel exactly the same way about expensive weddings. My wife and I were married in a government office (33 years ago), our son was married in a government office, and our daughter was married in the local court house. That's probably 100k saved right there. It is foolish, I think, for people to spend the down payment for a house on a wedding. I don't expect many to agree.
I agree 100% about weddings, but even here it doesn't have to be all or nothing. My ex-wife and I had a church wedding, but did not feed everone at a sit-down dinner. At the reception immediately following, the guests could have wedding cake and coffee, and that was quite adequate. Like Bideshi, I have often wondered why people who are not filthy rich spend the money they do on weddings. Appearances, I suppose. Like being embarrassed to drive anything less than a BMW or a Mercedes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 11-26-2010, 04:38 PM
 
34,426 posts, read 30,023,477 times
Reputation: 9084
I would say that the question would be answered the same easily;when your dead you are goinhg to worry. I dam not but my estate and executor will have plenty to pay offf any debt really. So 40% does not surprise with teh qauetion worded like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-26-2010, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Portland OR
10,019 posts, read 5,658,683 times
Reputation: 8141
I have a student loan I am paying off in monthly installments. It will outlive me. So I guess I am cheating the government on that. If I had the means to pay it off I would but I am also not going to my grave worrying about the fact that I can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-04-2010, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,796 posts, read 6,653,074 times
Reputation: 6955
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
Yes, death is the ultimate emergency. But why pay big bucks for a funeral? What is the point? Why not instruct your family to have your remains cremated immediately and scatter your ashes over the Pacific, Atlantic, Mount Washington, or wherever? Gone is gone. Let not consumerism consume even our final and most sacred act.
I couldn't agree more!

That the funeral industry will rape my estate is one point I will avoid at all cost.

I've left instructions with all my children that Mom & I are to be cremated then scattered to the four winds. NO stinking undertaker is gonna get one penney more than the cost to burn us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-04-2010, 04:29 PM
 
Location: West Columbia Gorge PNW
8,434 posts, read 11,158,520 times
Reputation: 5136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tightwad View Post
... NO stinking undertaker is gonna get one penney more than the cost to burn us.
I made sure I would fit in the wood stove, cheaper yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-04-2010, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
5,743 posts, read 3,139,265 times
Reputation: 8161
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthRabbit View Post
I made sure I would fit in the wood stove, cheaper yet.
Do-it-yourself cremations are illegal in most places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-04-2010, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
5,743 posts, read 3,139,265 times
Reputation: 8161
Default Undertakers more evil than car salesmen?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tightwad View Post
That the funeral industry will rape my estate is one point I will avoid at all cost.

I've left instructions with all my children that Mom & I are to be cremated then scattered to the four winds. NO stinking undertaker is gonna get one penney more than the cost to burn us.
Nothing wrong with choosing cremation, and nothing wrong with the prime motivation for it being to save money. So far, so good. But what I don't get is the intensity of your emotional reaction against undertakers and the funeral industry. Any business owner, be it a car dealer, a home-improvement contractor, or a furniture store owner, will try to steer people into more expensive options in order to increase his profits. It's up to us as consumers to resist those suggestions if we don't want them. Are you equally angry at these other business people? If not, why not?

As a group, I have not found undertakers to be more high-pressure people than any of the others. Here's a no-pressure example: When arranging my mother's funeral my sister and I were told by the funeral director to choose the casket by going into the casket room without him and to take our time and discuss it between us. There were dozens of caskets and we just noted the stock number and the price and gave it to him. No arguments, no pressure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-04-2010, 05:32 PM
 
616 posts, read 497,066 times
Reputation: 333
Its worth noting if you have heirs and an estate of some value (like a home) and actually intend to leave something to them, maxing out your debt before death just means your creditors will get first pick over whatever you had left when you died.

If you're childless or hate your kids...max them cards out!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-04-2010, 06:13 PM
 
Location: New England
8,375 posts, read 4,364,318 times
Reputation: 4709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Nothing wrong with choosing cremation, and nothing wrong with the prime motivation for it being to save money. So far, so good. But what I don't get is the intensity of your emotional reaction against undertakers and the funeral industry. Any business owner, be it a car dealer, a home-improvement contractor, or a furniture store owner, will try to steer people into more expensive options in order to increase his profits. It's up to us as consumers to resist those suggestions if we don't want them. Are you equally angry at these other business people? If not, why not?

As a group, I have not found undertakers to be more high-pressure people than any of the others. Here's a no-pressure example: When arranging my mother's funeral my sister and I were told by the funeral director to choose the casket by going into the casket room without him and to take our time and discuss it between us. There were dozens of caskets and we just noted the stock number and the price and gave it to him. No arguments, no pressure.
Funeral homes can make arrangements for every budget and some people need the comfort of that kind of service.

But I also just learned of a simple but contemporary independent crematorium (nationally certified) in Vermont that is located on a 200 acre dairy farm overlooking a lovely pasture. It is small-scale and very affordable. The family contacts them at their loved one's death and the deceased gets carried from the place s/he stopped breathing off to the hills of Vermont This service is "family direct"--no funeral home needed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-06-2010, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
13,134 posts, read 12,854,239 times
Reputation: 4564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreutz View Post
Its worth noting if you have heirs and an estate of some value (like a home) and actually intend to leave something to them, maxing out your debt before death just means your creditors will get first pick over whatever you had left when you died.

If you're childless or hate your kids...max them cards out!
Actually, my recent experience is exactly the opposite of this posting.

We had a family member pass away a few years ago who had run up a bit of debt on his credit cards, over $30 K. The cards were in his name only.

When he passed away, the credit card companies demanded payment from his widow. However, after checking out the laws pertaining to debt and death, we found that she wasn't liable for the debt at all, and the cards were never paid off.

So, I guess he "won".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:52 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top