Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Maryland
282 posts, read 382,188 times
Reputation: 338

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
How can an aged widow make it on $1,214 even if she does own her own home and doesn't have debt? And those are average benefits?
It is sad that people think Social Security is a retirement plan. Everybody should be saving for their old age and living within their means. What I find crazy is that SS pays a married couple almost double what they pay a single person, even if only one of the married worked their entire life. It doesn't cost twice the amount for two people to live together. If both worked 40-50 years that is a different story (start at age 18 and stop at age 68).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Amelia Island/Rhode Island
5,170 posts, read 6,136,412 times
Reputation: 6311
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
those that take little interest in their financial long term financial planning ,especially retirement rarely change regardless of the time frame.there are so many people out there that do everything well on the expense side. they know how to live below their means and do everything economically.

but then they blow it all by having little or no knowledge as to how to grow those pennies or even preserve them against inflation and taxes..
Your giving a lot of credit..........you are 100% correct about understanding and building wealth, but I feel the number of Americans who have no clue about simple savings and how to gradually introduce it into their budgeting at an early age is still staggering.

I think the emphasis on retirement in the last few years are changing these patterns, but as I have said in other posts I am in a small percentage of those in my peer group (mid fifities) that aggressively plan (building wealth) and save for retirement. Sometimes I think most people have a wait until I am closer to retirement to deal with it.

It is none of my business what people do with their finances.........but boy do I have to bite my tongue when I look at those I have worked with over the last 20 years and have seen their spending habits and now that they are getting close to retirement they are complaining that they are not prepared. The equity lines for the toys and tremendous overtime checks over the years.......but who am I to judge...at least I can retire with a clear financial goal achieved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:24 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,034,158 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by LookingatFL View Post
What forum are you and Tuborg spending the time in? Can anyone join?
I will send you a PM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:26 AM
 
106,646 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80122
Beat you to it ha ha ha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:27 AM
 
106,646 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80122
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSRSJim View Post
It is sad that people think Social Security is a retirement plan. Everybody should be saving for their old age and living within their means. What I find crazy is that SS pays a married couple almost double what they pay a single person, even if only one of the married worked their entire life. It doesn't cost twice the amount for two people to live together. If both worked 40-50 years that is a different story (start at age 18 and stop at age 68).
1-1/2 times ,as the spouse would get 1/2 fra
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:31 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,034,158 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
1-1/2 times ,as the spouse would get 1/2 fra
I think they mean that each is getting their own individual benefit and not spousal. My wife and I each will have our own benefit when I hit 70. Can you imagine if we had both waited til 70? I suspect they see SS as something akin to government support creating a floor for everyone with a much more limited ceiling. Sorta like a couple can only get one of their benefits you know the higher of the two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:41 AM
 
5,295 posts, read 5,236,547 times
Reputation: 18659
Video: The Retirement Gamble | Watch FRONTLINE Online | PBS Video
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:29 AM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,986,863 times
Reputation: 8910
[quote=mathjak107;33185974]

where were the happy successful people on that show?

quote]


That's the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:36 AM
 
106,646 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80122
They didn't interview them,that is where they were.it did not fit into the theme of the show as they were portraying plans..

They avoided anyone who didn't have a bad 401k and a poor investing plan .
There are millions of people just at vanguard and fidelity alone that have been very successful at growing their retirement money.

There are millions in other fund families as well who are retirement age and saved a whole load of dough in their plans.

At fidelity the median account for those over the age of 55 who saved from max to 1/2 max for just 10 years was 216k and that was during the lost decade.

Today it is more like 300k and i am sure many others at other fund families had similiar results

Last edited by mathjak107; 01-26-2014 at 10:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:51 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Thank you, Nicet4. The final link near the bottom of your post far exceeds the quality and sophistication of the average news article, as it is a 30-page academic study by a Ph.D.

Indeed, the thought of a widow existing on $1,214 a month is sobering. No room for any luxuries there, not even car ownership in many cases, I would think.
I think many municipalities give them a big break on property taxes. Not to say it makes life easy, but at least takes the "dirt" out of "dirt poor".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top