Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:33 AM
 
150 posts, read 143,139 times
Reputation: 383

Advertisements

Has anyone formally gone to a four day (10 hour) workweek prior to fully retiring?

Currently working five (10-12 hour) days per week and eligible to retire with 34 yrs and pension. Would still be a full time employee, just more reasonable hours. However, no desire to leave just yet at 58. Long weekends do beckon....

Would like to discuss with boss, but thinking it out fully first from all angles. Input?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2014, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Bay Area, California
118 posts, read 157,280 times
Reputation: 625
That is exactly what I am doing tho my situation is much different.

I am a RN in a busy unit. At age 60 I was working full time, during that year I dropped one day in a two week pay period. The next year I dropped another day (in a two week pay period), the next year I dropped another, etc. Now at age 64 I work 3 days a week.

This gives me the chance to preview retirement activities such as taking classes at a local University and Road Scholar trips.

Most importantly it weans me from the paycheck gradually. Really good preparation for retirement!

I think of it as wading into retirement instead of jumping off the high-diving board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
14,229 posts, read 30,019,975 times
Reputation: 27688
I worked 10 on 6 off for quite a while before I retired. Loved the long 'weekends' and going on vacations with an extra 6 days on either side of the week(or two) off was wonderful! It's doable for 24x7 operations and it does have it's own scheduling headaches.

But 10 days on was a long stretch!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 10:01 AM
 
Location: prescott az
6,957 posts, read 12,053,480 times
Reputation: 14244
I shortened my work week for 7 years going from full time to half time before retirement.
But, it also decreased my state pension and if I had realized this at the time, I would have stuck it out full time for much longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 12:11 PM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,108,628 times
Reputation: 18603
I can see some arguments for either possibility.

What do you want to do with your time off? What do you want to do when you retire?

I wanted to travel. I worked fulltime as long as necessary to meet my financial goals. Then I sold the house, turned in my notice and soon took off in an RV.

If you work one day a week less, what are you going to do with your time? Rest? Run errands?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
14,229 posts, read 30,019,975 times
Reputation: 27688
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrkliny View Post
I can see some arguments for either possibility.

What do you want to do with your time off? What do you want to do when you retire?

I wanted to travel. I worked fulltime as long as necessary to meet my financial goals. Then I sold the house, turned in my notice and soon took off in an RV.

If you work one day a week less, what are you going to do with your time? Rest? Run errands?
For me, the truth of the matter was I did less during the work week because of the extended hours. So part of my 'extra' time off was spent on catching up all the things I didn't get done. But it also saved me money. I had a 100 mile commute per day and any day I didn't have to drive in was money in the bank!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 12:52 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,816,250 times
Reputation: 18304
I had traveled a lot before retiring. I retired to do other things which I did. Now at 67 my want to have changed a lot and too long to list here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,898,193 times
Reputation: 32530
People with long commutes would love to work four days a week for forty hours as opposed to five days a week for forty hours. The work week is the same (i.e., forty hours) but the commute is reduced by 20% by reducing the number of days by one but increasing the hours per day correspondingly. Blessed are those, such as RN's, who have the type of work which allows that sort of flexibility, and also the flexibility to just go part-time, as in working three days per week, for example.

Not everybody needs full-time work, such as (but not limited to) women whose husbands earn good money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 08:52 PM
 
16,393 posts, read 30,261,314 times
Reputation: 25501
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhxBarb View Post
I shortened my work week for 7 years going from full time to half time before retirement.
But, it also decreased my state pension and if I had realized this at the time, I would have stuck it out full time for much longer.

You make an excellent point.

My wife volunteered to work part-time after retirement ... until she saw that it would reduce her pension and make her ineligible for retiree health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 08:54 PM
 
16,393 posts, read 30,261,314 times
Reputation: 25501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
People with long commutes would love to work four days a week for forty hours as opposed to five days a week for forty hours. The work week is the same (i.e., forty hours) but the commute is reduced by 20% by reducing the number of days by one but increasing the hours per day correspondingly. Blessed are those, such as RN's, who have the type of work which allows that sort of flexibility, and also the flexibility to just go part-time, as in working three days per week, for example.

And the employers in SoCal get credit for reducing the number of commute days in their business. It can be a win-win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top