Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2015, 12:30 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,799,048 times
Reputation: 6550

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMtAiry View Post
All you have to do is any form of Google search and you can see the figures. They are shockingly low and not even close to a million. Which was the opening poster's point. Again the investment firms market very well by telling you how far behind you are and how they can help you make up for lost ground.
The thing is you can go back 15 years and dig up data and it was just as gloomy; over half the retirees were certain to be in poverty. Yet it has remained steady at about 10% for the over 65 population:

How to reduce poverty and increase economic mobility | Brookings Institution
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2015, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
The thing is you can go back 15 years and dig up data and it was just as gloomy; over half the retirees were certain to be in poverty. Yet it has remained steady at about 10% for the over 65 population:
10% doesn't seem like a "crisis" to me. It's rather silly to think you can get that down to 0%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:01 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,799,048 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
10% doesn't seem like a "crisis" to me. It's rather silly to think you can get that down to 0%.
I think there are more that are not far above it than there used to be though. I do think we need to help more people prepare better. But I also think expectations are a bit high as far as standard of living below which is "substandard". I am a liberal and I do want to help the people that fall below the threshold. I think everyone should have access to medical care, a safe place to live and food to eat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:20 PM
 
2,420 posts, read 4,370,522 times
Reputation: 3528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
But you through in an interesting wrench - income. Lets say you are able to get 5% return on that million and you can live on $50,000 total income. Then they are both the same, right? Except it cost a lot more during your working years to accumulate the Roth money. I could be wrong though. Isn't Roth appreciation taxed on withdrawal?

You have to consider though, if you are getting a 5% return, you really shouldn't be withdrawing more than
2 1/2% these days. The other half goes to future inflation and if your lucky some growth. So realistically today if you read all the current number crunching from the experts, withdrawals today are in the 2.5% category. The days of the safe 4% withdrawal are long gone. Too many changes in economic factors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:29 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
I think there are more that are not far above it than there used to be though. I do think we need to help more people prepare better. But I also think expectations are a bit high as far as standard of living below which is "substandard". I am a liberal and I do want to help the people that fall below the threshold. I think everyone should have access to medical care, a safe place to live and food to eat.
So who make places unsafe? People who want something that is someone else's without having to work for it, they'd rather take it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:37 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,259,472 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
10% doesn't seem like a "crisis" to me. It's rather silly to think you can get that down to 0%.
The 50th percentile of household net worth for ages 65+ is $171K
Citation: Typical net worth by age: Where do you stand?

I imagine that for many, most of that household net worth is home equity. Most people

Unless you're public sector, a defined benefit pension is an extinct dinosaur. A huge chunk of late-boomers and Gen-X are looking at a Social Security check and nothing else.

I'll retire with my house plus other assets worth more than $1 million 8 years from now but I won't have a million in tax deferred retirement savings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:37 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,799,048 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
So who make places unsafe? People who want something that is someone else's without having to work for it, they'd rather take it.
and being weatherproof and wired properly and not infested; possibly also handicap accessible. I wasn't just talking about crime; some low end housing is unsafe for other reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:49 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,040,852 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandyJet View Post
But that is just their Fidelity accounts which is a lot different than how much folks have in 401Ks.

For instance we use Fidelity at work like a lot of places. I hired a women 15 years out of college recently. She left her 401K at old job and enrolled at Fidelity in her new 401K.

So now it shows a 36 year old with barely a two or three thousand saved for retirement because Fidelity does not have access to her big 401k info the one she had for 15 years.

And some 401Ks that are really big are at places like JPMorgan and Merrill they have tons and tons of folks making over 200K who max out 401k and those companies manage own 401K. In fact large Investment banks and places like that where folks can max out 401ks from day one often do it themselves so maybe Fidelity attracts smaller balances.

My question is there any real data base that shows what the average person has in all his 401ks combined? if not the numbers thrown around are misleading
I doubt if such a data base exists. One of the things about Fidelity is they have a very strong workplace footprint. Many of those workplaces are in the public sector. That marriage of average pension benefit and retirement account balance is probably not in many if any data bases. That average fidelity on top of a pension creates a different picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 02:05 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 6,449,583 times
Reputation: 3481
And also folks don't even tap 401ks for retirement. Pretty much I plan to eventually get it moved to IRAs, then in my estate move it to IRAs in grandkids names. That sets up the IRA to be distributed over that kids life time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Central NY
5,947 posts, read 5,113,548 times
Reputation: 16882
Quote:
Originally Posted by [B
ReachTheBeach;[/b]41819499]I think for many of us this may be because the recommendations are too high. I think the million dollar mantra is crap. It is a great goal to have and enough to be pretty confident that you are set for retirement, but if you are getting SS or a pension that pays over $2k per month and you don't insist on living the high life, you can get by with a lot less. Yes, there are a lot of people unprepared. But I don't think it is as bad as they make it out to be.
Hi, I really appreciate what you have written here and in some other posts on this thread.

Sometimes I think it's a comparison game here on this thread, who's got the most and some don't mind telling it. When I was a lot younger, I compared stuff too, but as I've gotten older I believe it is all about being happy with what you have. It's not about your neighbor having a million bucks. Big deal. I'm not terribly impressed. Does it make that person a good person? Do they deserve more respect than those of us with a lot less? I don't think so. And, God forbid, what happens to that millionaire if they have the misfortune of coming down with a deadly disease and end up spending that million in the hopes of being cured.

One of your other posts talked about how spoiled we are. Boy, have you got that right.

Money is not the cure for everything. Old saying..... money is the root of all evil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top