Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2016, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, AK
7,448 posts, read 7,585,099 times
Reputation: 16456

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by luzianne View Post
I think I will be healthier when I am done sitting at a desk for 8 hours a day and am up moving around and doing things around the house that I don't have time for now - cleaning, painting, organizing, downsizing, rearranging, pruning, etc. After 8 hours at a desk, I frankly am lethargic, tired, and have no energy to do those things. Inertia - an object at rest stays at rest.

Now you'll spend 8 hours a day on your computer posting in forums like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2016, 08:18 PM
 
29 posts, read 26,981 times
Reputation: 37
Nationally, about half of workers retire every year earlier than they planned.
33 percent want to work past 65 but half retire at 62 or earlier.
https://www.ebri.org/files/Final-FS....ects.FINAL.pdf

I plan to retire in a few years and do some volunteer work. Guess the Cato Institute doesn't consider that real work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,328 posts, read 6,016,928 times
Reputation: 10963
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaErik View Post
Now you'll spend 8 hours a day on your computer posting in forums like this.
That would actually be a valid point if posters did, in fact, spend 8 hours a day on the computer without any breaks (or even two 10 minute breaks) allotted for stretching the legs or going to the bathroom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,543,609 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenora View Post
That would actually be a valid point if posters did, in fact, spend 8 hours a day on the computer without any breaks (or even two 10 minute breaks) allotted for stretching the legs or going to the bathroom.
seems illegal or stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 10:09 PM
 
5,455 posts, read 3,384,993 times
Reputation: 12177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
The libertarian Cato Institute recently flagged a paper published as part of the International Social Security Project by the National Bureau of Economic Research which tried to quantify just how much unused “work capacity” there is among retired Americans. Researchers determined that about 28 percent of Americans between the ages of 55 and 69 are healthy enough to be working but are not.

Get Off the Couch, Grandpa: Study Says Elderly Can Work Longer | The Fiscal Times

The real slackers, though, are people aged 70 to 74. The study found that 39 percent are still healthy enough to work but do not.

After all, shouldn't we all work until we drop?

There would be even fewer jobs for college graduates and the 30-55 age range.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 01:15 AM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
1,413 posts, read 1,515,385 times
Reputation: 1205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
The libertarian Cato Institute recently flagged a paper published as part of the International Social Security Project by the National Bureau of Economic Research which tried to quantify just how much unused “work capacity” there is among retired Americans. Researchers determined that about 28 percent of Americans between the ages of 55 and 69 are healthy enough to be working but are not.

Get Off the Couch, Grandpa: Study Says Elderly Can Work Longer | The Fiscal Times

The real slackers, though, are people aged 70 to 74. The study found that 39 percent are still healthy enough to work but do not.

After all, shouldn't we all work until we drop?
Unused work capacity? The labor market can't even accommodate the unused work capacity that is actually looking to be used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 01:32 AM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,458 posts, read 1,169,560 times
Reputation: 3098
Yep, whose jobs would we be taking? I don't care what some dumb study says, I've worked since I was 16 except for the few years I was an unpaid caregiver and these last 2 years are murder. I can't wait to quit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,328 posts, read 6,016,928 times
Reputation: 10963
Everyone seems to be missing the point. How long can most seniors continue to work before they need to retire and collect Social Security benefits ?

The youngest generations are already scheduled to claim full retirement benefits at 67 and (some) politicians are proposing to raise their full retirement age even higher. I personally think the underlying data used in the paper sucks, but I can see where certain politicians would use the results to bolster their argument in raising the full retirement age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 07:38 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,957,599 times
Reputation: 33185
Wonderful. Then I suggest Rob Garver, the author of this article, and all the other proponents of working until death do just that. The rest of us can make our own personal decisions about what we want for our lives
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 07:44 AM
 
Location: SW Florida
14,945 posts, read 12,139,254 times
Reputation: 24822
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim9251 View Post
I never thought of it, but that is a goal I will reach for. Let's see I worked since I was 13, retired at 58 from the same career of 35 years, 64 1/2 now, so I plan to be retired until um...117? Sounds good to me!
I was in the workforce for 42 yrs before I retired. But I still have a part-time consulting job that I work at from home- still paying income taxes, Medicare and SS for that income so I guess it counts as work. Wow, at age 68 now, have been retired from my last job for 4.5 yrs, guess that means I'd need to work till I'm 114 to even that out. Well, 114 and counting.

But, to the CATO Institute who opines that many of us seniors need to get off our duffs and go to work, as far as I'm concerned, they can sit on it and spin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top