Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2016, 10:41 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058

Advertisements

YES !

much to our surprise the examiner at social security/ medicare ruled in our favor and is rolling back marilyns premium by 300 a month .

we won , but not on the grounds i was making for our case .

i was arguing that they should not use 2014 tax returns but instead go by 2015 .since we had a one time sale of an asset and no one was on medicare yet or retired .

the examiner shot that down because they have very strict rules on asset sales as far as what makes for a life changing event and we didn't qualify .

but she said that because we stopped work in 2015 and saw such a drastic income cut from 2014 that it could be considered a life changing event and ruled in our favor . she reduced us by almost 300 a month and will give us back the almost 900 we already over paid.

i did not think we had a chance winning this so i was pleasantly surprised .

that is the advantage of doing some planning , we set a side 2 years of withdrawals in cash prior to retiring so it generated very little taxable income in comparison for 2015 swaying their decision .

Last edited by mathjak107; 04-15-2016 at 11:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2016, 10:54 AM
 
Location: NC
9,358 posts, read 14,085,892 times
Reputation: 20913
Congratulations! I was not so lucky in my appeal. After I sold my property, thus triggering the increase, I did not use that money to live on until the NEXT year. Silly me. The fun part is that I suspect that overall, you have at least 3 times the potential income that I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 11:06 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
live and learn , to bad we usually end up learning after the fact . like locking the barn after the horse runs away . never did i ever consider that sale in 2014 would trigger a huge penalty 2 years later in retirement , who knew , i knew nothing about medicare yet , didn't have to . wrong !


.. if i was on medicare too that would have been almost a 600 per month increase on top of the old premium , more then 9k a year for the two of us for just medicare premiums that cost a couple 208 a month or 2500 bucks a year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,193,944 times
Reputation: 13779
Congrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 11:59 AM
 
809 posts, read 1,180,837 times
Reputation: 1600
Great news. Seems we are all always learning and I for one truly appreciate all the education you give to us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 12:15 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993
Congrats! I thought the max payment was $300 something, how come so much?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 12:43 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
389.80 per month per person is the max. they go by income two years back . 2 years ago we were both working and our partners sold off the lease rights we held on the central park south building . that was enough to max us out .

max is 389.50 per person .

Last edited by mathjak107; 04-15-2016 at 01:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 01:03 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993
I see it's for a couple.

Last edited by NewbieHere; 04-15-2016 at 01:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 01:04 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
Quote:
Originally Posted by saralvr View Post
Great news. Seems we are all always learning and I for one truly appreciate all the education you give to us.
thanks , but don't give me to much credit , i just steal what i know from folks a whole lot smarter .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2016, 01:05 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
I see its for a couple.
don't mis-read it . that is taxable income level if filing jointly . the premium paid is per person . it would have been almost a 600 dollar increase per month for the two of us if i was of age .

the columns did not copy properly so just look here .

http://www.kiplinger.com/article/ret...016.html#table
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top