Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099

Advertisements

The young tend to keep blaming us Babyboomers for all the problems with Social Security and the lack of planning for having enough money to live on in retirement.

What they don't consider is the fact that most of the boomers had parents that grew up during the depression. Those were tough times, and most people that came through it, became extremely frugal for the rest of their lives. When the boomers of today were children, their parents, being so frugal, could not or would not provide their kids with much more than what they needed to get by. Even if they had it, they would not use it, for fear that it wouldn't be there if and when it was needed.

Most of the kids who grew up to be Babyboomers, made unconscious or conscious decisions to do better for their children than their parents did for them. So they often sacrificed their futures for the betterment, so they thought, of their children. Bigger houses so their children can each have their own bedrooms. A bigger yard so they can play outside without having to go to a nearby park. A college education for kids who, in some cases, should never have gone to college. You name it. We did a lot more for our kids than our parents did for us, because they could not bring themselves to spend more than they considered necessary, due to what they had gone through. Did we spoil our children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:26 AM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
The real reason to blame the Boomers is their lousy birthrate. If they'd maintained a high enough birth rate, there would be plenty of Millennials entering their prime earning years to fund the 30% gap in Social Security cash flow.

The United States actually looks pretty good compared to northern Europe and Japan/South Korea where they're seeing declining populations. Social Security is only a 30% gap, not the debacle many of the other rapidly aging first world countries are experiencing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:29 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
We had all the kids we could afford -2

The cost of raising kids was far different then my parents generation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,214 posts, read 11,325,556 times
Reputation: 20827
I'd suggest a read of Lyndon Jones' Great Expectations; a social history of the baby boom in America, (up to its publication c.1982);. It could be argued that the baby boom was the first generation brought up in a fully-developed welfare state with a mixed economy; also the first in which demographers were fully aware of the consequences of a bulge in with the age ranges of the population, and of the stresses within a society created by that aberration.

The problem is usually laid at the feet of aging boomers who want someone to do all the unwanted jobs which are a by-product of a "mature"(?) de-industrialized, service-oriented economy. Personal service is something everyone loves to get, and no one wants to spend his/her live providing at low levels of pay. So the "politicians "solved" the problem by opening the immigration floodgates, and a clandestine economy developed -- mostly because economic realities couldn't match the unrealistic expectations of the politicians who created the Frankenstein, and their clientele.

The problem seems likely to worsen, as most Americans simply refuse to recognize that the incredible prosperity of 1953-65 was a one-time event, and can't be restoerd without sinking back into the mercantilist thinking that spawnwd the two World Wars. We are likely to face more and more hard choices as both the boomers and their offspring confront the realities of advancing nge and other dilemmas central to the human condition.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 07-10-2016 at 08:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
I would have to disagree that the baby boomers were brought up with welfare. If anything the welfare state came up in the 70's and 80's, after the 60's revolution stabilized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
We had all the kids we could afford -2

The cost of raising kids was far different then my parents generation
The costs are related to the expectations of what the parents would do for their kids which is relative to my OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
The real reason to blame the Boomers is their lousy birthrate. If they'd maintained a high enough birth rate, there would be plenty of Millennials entering their prime earning years to fund the 30% gap in Social Security cash flow.

The United States actually looks pretty good compared to northern Europe and Japan/South Korea where they're seeing declining populations. Social Security is only a 30% gap, not the debacle many of the other rapidly aging first world countries are experiencing.
If the Boomers had maintained the birthrate of their parents, there would be a whole other set of society ills we would have to contend with today. JOBS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
If the Boomers had maintained the birthrate of their parents, there would be a whole other set of society ills we would have to contend with today. JOBS?
Not to mention that, if the boomers had more kids that they wanted to do better by than their parents did for them, they would have less retirement funds available for themselves.

It all gets back to the fact that boomers may have spent too much on their children and did not hold back enough for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,898,193 times
Reputation: 32530
While the original post of this thread is reasonable, sensible, and entirely void of invective, it is interesting how intense the feelings can get when it comes to generational discussions. In fact the word "hatred" would not be too strong. Right here in the Retirement Forum, there was a fairly recent thread in which one poster ended several different posts with this statement directed to Boomers: "Thanks for destroying America". The Economics Forum has two stickies, the first one of which is entitled "Generation wars will not be permitted". Having read a few of the "generation wars" there over the years, I was stunned by the extreme hatred directed against us Baby Boomers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
While the original post of this thread is reasonable, sensible, and entirely void of invective, it is interesting how intense the feelings can get when it comes to generational discussions. In fact the word "hatred" would not be too strong. Right here in the Retirement Forum, there was a fairly recent thread in which one poster ended several different posts with this statement directed to Boomers: "Thanks for destroying America". The Economics Forum has two stickies, the first one of which is entitled "Generation wars will not be permitted". Having read a few of the "generation wars" there over the years, I was stunned by the extreme hatred directed against us Baby Boomers.
I guess that's the eventual outcome when you spoil the children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top