Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2008, 04:43 PM
 
16,087 posts, read 41,155,936 times
Reputation: 6376

Advertisements

I think the burbs which will suffer most are the true bedroom ones away from employment centers - in which some are hastily built-oversize homes which will be very expensive to heat, cool and maintain (open floor plan/cathedral ceilings). I mean besides the high property taxes, HOA dues, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2008, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
Maybe the idea of a individual family home costing 2 million dollars is desireable is the problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2008, 09:49 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,838,702 times
Reputation: 18304
The burbs will continue to grow just as always.In the growth areas of this country the businesses are following them.Itis the cities that are having massive problems with the foreclosures happening now. They have massive problems with coming budgets.For years they have had problems with industry leaving and relocating to places that have the work force and cheaper cost of doing business. I only forsee worse times for many large cities as the middle class continue to moveout.

Last edited by texdav; 05-12-2008 at 10:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2008, 07:48 AM
 
80 posts, read 348,907 times
Reputation: 46
Sounds like hype on the part of realtors to get people to buy and sell houses so they can earn a commission - echoes of block busting in the 60's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2008, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Home is where the heart is
15,402 posts, read 28,944,197 times
Reputation: 19090
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
In the growth areas of this country the businesses are following them.
That's what I see happening in my neck of the woods. My son's business, for example, is moving into a building in an outer 'burb.

The building is in an office park, halfway between a large shopping area and Dulles airport, two things that are important to his business. He says his new building got several new occupants in the last month.

Many small businesses see this as an opportunity because suburban office space is affordable right now. My son is happy to leave the growing crime rate where his old office was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2008, 10:55 AM
 
18 posts, read 16,033 times
Reputation: 13
Interesting situation. I sure have seen some run down suburban areas. Gasoline has not helped the situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2008, 02:11 PM
 
16,087 posts, read 41,155,936 times
Reputation: 6376
Here the suburbs have very high foreclosure rates and unfinished subdivisions, builders bankrupt, etc...I saw it before in Houston after the oil bust.

See-through suburbs is what they were called then -- kind of like the see-through empty office buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2008, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,214,577 times
Reputation: 7373
Having just read the article I disagree with the conclusion. Overall, according to the US Census Bureau, population in the USA is going to continue to grow to about 420 million by 2050. That is about 120 million more than we have today, and they will all live somewhere.

The suburbs are going through some problems right now, no doubt about it. My expectation is that this isn't a mega-trend, but a temporary problem.

I do think that many cities are going to have significant downtown and inner suburb redevelopment, but the further suburbs will still have plenty of folks populating those areas.


http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/natprojtab01a.pdf (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2008, 07:20 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,838,702 times
Reputation: 18304
The cities are going thru major financial crisis now from losing their tax base according to many major city mayors in testimony to congress. That is why they are asking for congresss to include money for them to buy houses that are vacant.In fact many say it is the cities that are pushing most for the financial bailout on foreclosures.This is just adding to the infrastructure problems the cities are already having.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2008, 10:09 PM
 
46 posts, read 152,356 times
Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
Having just read the article I disagree with the conclusion. Overall, according to the US Census Bureau, population in the USA is going to continue to grow to about 420 million by 2050. That is about 120 million more than we have today, and they will all live somewhere.

The suburbs are going through some problems right now, no doubt about it. My expectation is that this isn't a mega-trend, but a temporary problem.

I do think that many cities are going to have significant downtown and inner suburb redevelopment, but the further suburbs will still have plenty of folks populating those areas.
I think you're right. Now if the USA had a declining population, the demographic significance of the retiring baby boomers would be a lot bigger, and more in line with what the article is talking about. But the US is getting more and more populated. Stable birth rates and massive immigration numbers. It's really simple supply and demand.

New suburban tracts will be built, and the ones that already exist will be in more valued locations than the new ones. The demand will always be there, obviously except for areas that are declining in population. The current bubble is a separate story... no reason for the price to earnings ratios to be so out of whack in the housing market, and there is no reason for homes to be valued so highly in areas that have so much land, they could build a billion houses on (like inland California, Arizona, Nevada, Florida, etc).

Gas is going to get more and more expensive, but cars are going to get more and more fuel efficient (or at least, the demand for greater fuel efficiency will increase, as it is already, and gas is still really cheap compared to what it will be in the coming years...). Personally I'm going to pass on having a single family home in the suburbs, but that's just me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top