Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2016, 08:17 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,567 posts, read 17,271,154 times
Reputation: 37285

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmarlin20 View Post
My DH and I retired before age 60, it has worked out just fine. No, neither of us has a pension.

Too much doom and gloom on this forum. I think it is wise to advise caution when making financial decisions, but trying to make the point it is almost impossible to retire before sixty is unnecessary pessimism.
Could you have made it at age 50?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2016, 08:41 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,567 posts, read 17,271,154 times
Reputation: 37285
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREE866 View Post
...............Great point about the SS and I have that baked in to the amount I will withdraw when I'm 70...and if indeed things do get really messy I can always opt to take out earlier
Out of curiosity - and I'm not expecting you to reveal actual numbers - what does it do to Social Security when you don't have income for the last 20 years?

The reason I ask:
We were self employed. In order to save money, she would take all the money one year and I would take it all the next. That way, only one of us would pay Social Security. Person A maxes out the income, and person B pays nothing. Switch, the next year.
We looked at it with our accountant, and while he admitted it was a little unusual, it was not illegal and it saved money, and it made no difference in our Social Security amounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 08:44 PM
 
249 posts, read 266,882 times
Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Could you have made it at age 50?
When we retired my DH was just turning 50, I was 48. We paid for health insurance before being eligible for medicare, now we pay for our supplemental health and prescription insurance.

My DH just turned 70 last week, we are doing fine. We are financially comfortable, we have money for our expenses and vacations, etc. Today 08:41 PM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 09:05 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,567 posts, read 17,271,154 times
Reputation: 37285
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmarlin20 View Post
When we retired my DH was just turning 50, I was 48. We paid for health insurance before being eligible for medicare, now we pay for our supplemental health and prescription insurance.

My DH just turned 70 last week, we are doing fine. We are financially comfortable, we have money for our expenses and vacations, etc. Today 08:41 PM
Pension? Or no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 10:00 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,081,214 times
Reputation: 6649
They said above, no pension. But they didn't reveal where they live (COL) if they owned a home, propertty taxes, etc, etc. Its not doom and gloom, but lets compare apples to apples. Does anyone think that 70 today is the same as 70 will be in 20 years, cost wise?? You are married filing jointly. The OP is single. Your medical cost for insurance for the 15 years before Medicare pales immensely to what the OPs will be for the next 15. Etc, etc, etc. In the late 90s, when you retired, you came off 20 years of the highest returns on the stock market. Again, just saying. This ain't 1996 by any stretch.

To Listener: alternating salaries every other year would protect each of you in case of divorce, but it does not maximize your SS if you stayed married. The SS income depends on how much your salaries are, of course. The maximum would be to make sure both has their full 40 quarters, but allocate the majority to one earner all the time until max or near max SS contributions (for 35 years) are made that year, and the remainder to the other. Maximum income for the least SS payments would be for one to collect as much as possible and the spouse to collect half off the others at FRA. Of course, if you both earn max, it makes no difference. Use SSAnalyze to run scenarios.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 12:54 AM
 
2,761 posts, read 2,229,216 times
Reputation: 5600
How old is your GF and is she planning to keep on working? Is she okay with you retiring early?

From glancing at your posts you seem like a minimalist. Doesn't sound like you travel so that saves a lot of money right there. No expensive hobbies right?

Too bad you can't grind it out another 5 years to pad your savings. 40+ years seems like a long time assuming you live to 90+.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 03:47 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,210,718 times
Reputation: 3752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockyman View Post
How old is your GF and is she planning to keep on working? Is she okay with you retiring early?

From glancing at your posts you seem like a minimalist. Doesn't sound like you travel so that saves a lot of money right there. No expensive hobbies right?

Too bad you can't grind it out another 5 years to pad your savings. 40+ years seems like a long time assuming you live to 90+.
She's 37.....shes happy as long as I'm happy...
I travel...not a ton, but take 1-2 vacations per year and that is accounted for in my expenses....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 03:50 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,210,718 times
Reputation: 3752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Out of curiosity - and I'm not expecting you to reveal actual numbers - what does it do to Social Security when you don't have income for the last 20 years?

The reason I ask:
We were self employed. In order to save money, she would take all the money one year and I would take it all the next. That way, only one of us would pay Social Security. Person A maxes out the income, and person B pays nothing. Switch, the next year.
We looked at it with our accountant, and while he admitted it was a little unusual, it was not illegal and it saved money, and it made no difference in our Social Security amounts.
Good question...when I go to my SS page it indicates like 43K per year at age 70, but that assumes I work I think until like age 63..

I visited the SS office and explained what I was doing....they said that based on not working another day that number goes to like 33K at 70.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 04:50 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,210,718 times
Reputation: 3752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockyman View Post
How old is your GF and is she planning to keep on working? Is she okay with you retiring early?

From glancing at your posts you seem like a minimalist. Doesn't sound like you travel so that saves a lot of money right there. No expensive hobbies right?

Too bad you can't grind it out another 5 years to pad your savings. 40+ years seems like a long time assuming you live to 90+.

Hi Stocky,

As I might have mentioned I've been selling for almost 30 years and been at the same company for almost 12. I'm just done. I know myself. I'm def done with corporate America. That doesn't mean after 6 months I won't consider doing something that brings in more income, but man the idea of just "not working" for a bit and doing things I truly enjoy is something I really look forward to!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,083,135 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREE866 View Post
If $600,000 in 1988 went to zero right before the biggest bull market in history with staggering returns in the mid-late 90's it's pretty safe to assume his investment choices were terrible.....or his spending habits were extremely high

Great point about the SS and I have that baked in to the amount I will withdraw when I'm 70...and if indeed things do get really messy I can always opt to take out earlier
You keep talking about SS being your backup, but you are still only 50. If major changes are made to SS in order to save it, the changes usually are for future beneficiaries. They don't effect people over 55, because they do not have enough time to plan for the changes. You seem to have enough money and few expenses right now, but if there is any risk that your situation could get bad, you may want to wait a few years to make sure your failsafe SS will be there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top