Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All the 401Ks that my employers have offered have been administered by outside investment firms, like Fidelity or Merrill Lynch, for example. It's a lot like an IRA, but the 401Ks will usually allow higher annual contributions than an IRA, and the 401K contributions can be through payroll deduction. The employer must deposit contributions no later than the 15th business day of the following month (or sooner, in some cases). The employer might also offer a matching contribution, but they can also increase, reduce, or eliminate that contribution (as Charlygal states), at their discretion, with proper notice.
My parents (Silent Generation) had pensions, but most Boomers & later generations are going to be less likely to be eligible for pensions, and will more likely have to rely on Social Security & 401Ks/IRAs for retirement income. I would agree with Tallysmom that it would be best to also consider IRAs and other savings/investments, even with an employer 401K. But the only employer expense for a 401K (outside of the employer contribution, if offered), is usually just a nominal administrative fee paid to the investment group handling the employer's account.
My sister-in-law [two years older than I am] worked for a company that had a 401[K] with 5% match, managed by Fidelity. She passed away 2 years ago, just as she turned 60.
My sister-in-law [two years older than I am] worked for a company that had a 401[K] with 5% match, managed by Fidelity. She passed away 2 years ago, just as she turned 60.
I am 60, and have never had an employer that didn’t have a company match on the 401k. A high school & college friend, same, and we both worked in different private industries and we both have pensions. Both our companies NOW have no pension benefits (mine in 2008, his in 2010 for new employees) but both increased company match significantly for their new hires. It’s all about choices and capabilities.
Is a pension really planning? Maybe It's the times we are living in, but I consider retirement planning to be based around personal savings, investments, and 401k/IRA accounts. True pensions are an uncontrollable form of "getting lucky."
I've never worked at a company that offered a pension.
He was born in 1919. That sort of thing was rather common then. You put in your 30 years, there's a little party at the end of your last day, you get some sort of parting gift. So, yes, that was part of retirement planning.
All the 401Ks that my employers have offered have been administered by outside investment firms, like Fidelity or Merrill Lynch, for example. It's a lot like an IRA, but the 401Ks will usually allow higher annual contributions than an IRA, and the 401K contributions can be through payroll deduction. The employer must deposit contributions no later than the 15th business day of the following month (or sooner, in some cases). The employer might also offer a matching contribution, but they can also increase, reduce, or eliminate that contribution (as Charlygal states), at their discretion, with proper notice.
My parents (Silent Generation) had pensions, but most Boomers & later generations are going to be less likely to be eligible for pensions, and will more likely have to rely on Social Security & 401Ks/IRAs for retirement income. I would agree with Tallysmom that it would be best to also consider IRAs and other savings/investments, even with an employer 401K. But the only employer expense for a 401K (outside of the employer contribution, if offered), is usually just a nominal administrative fee paid to the investment group handling the employer's account.
We’ve been out of the 401K game for 20 years. We opened a business and we use SEP IRA, and IRAs. We took our 401Ks and dumped them into IRA rollovers. Much happier all round now.
When we had 401Ks, they had high expenses and very vanilla choices. There was a choice of aggressive, medium risk, safer risk and money market. In each category, there were two funds to choose from.
We dumped as much as we could into them while we worked there, in fact husband didn’t have a 401k till he was about 9 years in.
I just remember a bunch of places getting busted for 401k shenanigans.
I can't tell you how many people on this forum have told me that I am 'lucky' to have served 20-years in the Navy and gotten a pension.
Better than nothing, I guess. My husband was lucky to get his military pension. The Army was downsizing, and they were dumping people and projects as fast as they could. They showed him the door not long before his 20.
Some people got nothing--forced out at 18. Some in other commands got a check which was the equivalent of about four years of retirement pay. Congress decided that military personnel who worked in x,y, and z, and had planned to stay until 20 or longer should get something. He got about 60% of what had been promised.
Yes, you were lucky to have gotten a pension. Not everyone did.
you think a single person would get $200 a month in food stamps? what do you base that on? And how about waiting lists for subsidized housing, as the population ages, they are just going to get longer.
People with $1,500. per month income would get no food stamps. They are issued on a sliding scale and only those with no income at all, get the full amount.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.