Quote:
Originally Posted by fumbling
You might want to read this about giving up ironclad protection against creditors or legal judgments if you roll over a 401k to an IRA:
IRAs Could Be Fair Game in Lawsuits
If you have access to low cost stock index funds in your 401k, you may not need more options or control. However there are arguments pro and con for rollovers but one con is giving up the legal protection, although there are states that protect IRAs from creditors/judgments.
|
Thanks. I did a little research and both NC, where I am now, and FL, my most likely landing spot for retirement, have laws that exempt IRAs from judgments. My employer strongly encourages rollovers at 59.5. It's a small company and they don't like the liability. An embezzlement or getting conned into losing some or all of the 401(k) funds would shutter the company if the balance is high enough. I will be rolling out over 20% of the total balance for the company. The younger employees either don't participate or don't put much away. The two employees older than me both rolled out their money at 59.5 and only have smallish balances now.
The article did get me thinking about the umbrella liability policy.