Social Security Question about Spousal Benefits (anniversary, federal, 2015, accidents)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
grlwthprl, as far as your filing early at 62, your permanent reduction would look like this:
Say your FRA benefit is $600
At 62 you get a reduced early benefit of $420
When your husband retires you will get a spousal add-on that is calculated as the difference between that $600 and 1/2 of his FRA benefit.
Let's say for example his FRA benefit is $2000. So your spousal bump will be $1000 (1/2 his FRA amount) minus $600 (your FRA amount) = $400.
That $400 will be added to your (reduced) benefit of $420 = $820/mo
Had you waited until your FRA age to file, the $400 spousal bump would be added to your FRA benefit of $600 = $1000/mo
Last edited by PNW to NEPA; 03-23-2019 at 02:15 PM..
Reason: clarity
Best decision my wife and I ever made was to delay taking my taking benefits until age 70.
Had I taken it at 66 we could have lived on it but by waiting I got an extra $750 every month and that is our fun money!
But more important than the fun money is the knowledge that should something happen to me first, which is likely I suppose, she will collect my full benefit and be able to live very comfortably on just that if she had to. The knowledge of that allows me to sleep well at night. I owe it to her.
best decision we made is not waiting to 70...we were spending down our own assets at the rate of over 40,000 extra dollars a year up fronting the ss we were not getting on top of our regular portfolio draw so delaying was costing us a lot plus any gains on that money were given up as it was spent . those assets would be gone forever .along with their compounding ..plus my wife could not get 4500 a year extra added to her early benefit as spousal until i filed , so 65 was fine for us , i was also not protected under hold harmless from medicare increases while delaying so i paid more than my wife did . ...
delaying had a very big cost to go with that extra monthly payment for us .. i can see delaying being a slam dunk if you work that long and don't retire before you collect .. but because there is so much else that needs to be looked at in order to evaluate those extra payments , most people don't realize there is a big cost to it ..
depending on longevity risk vs market /interest rate risk either one can play out the better choice but you won't know which up front ..
Last edited by mathjak107; 03-23-2019 at 03:18 PM..
It depends on the individual situation. Mine took at 64.5, best if he did delay until FRA which is 66 for him. I earned more because I had more than 35 years, 36 years to be exact, so I take mine at 70. It’s a dongle approach, but I’m 8 years younger.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.