Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-12-2019, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,209 posts, read 29,018,601 times
Reputation: 32595

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
Do you find the air in Tucson to help with your breathing? Just curious.
Less wind is helpful, which brings in that fine silica, that powdery film that collects on your cars, which goes into your lungs. Las Vegas is a windy city, 9.2MPH average annual windspeeds, and they could get wind blasters to 70MPH. I haven't experienced that here in Tucson, at least in my first year here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2019, 01:40 PM
 
Location: moved
13,643 posts, read 9,698,765 times
Reputation: 23452
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
I've long known worry and stress are negative emotions, which can reduce your immune system and perhaps cause illnesses, so worrying and stressing out about the future, what does it accomplish?
It accomplishes a shortening of lifespan, so that one dies before running out of money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 03:23 PM
 
550 posts, read 368,344 times
Reputation: 883
Odd provision. Here is the other negative (besides inherited IRAs requirements) from Bankrate website:

Makes select pensions less secure: The Secure Act would accelerate community newspaper pension plan insolvency by allowing financially troubled newspapers to decrease their employer payments, effectively borrowing against employees’ retirements.

The newspapers would be able to artificially increase their assumed interest rate and increase their amortization periods. By allowing unrealistic assumptions, this select subset of newspaper pension plans would be able to shift tens of millions of dollars in otherwise required pension contributions into their own profits.

This provision would make community newspaper employees’ retirements less secure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 05:23 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,631,684 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotpair View Post
Odd provision. Here is the other negative (besides inherited IRAs requirements) from Bankrate website:

Makes select pensions less secure: The Secure Act would accelerate community newspaper pension plan insolvency by allowing financially troubled newspapers to decrease their employer payments, effectively borrowing against employees’ retirements.

The newspapers would be able to artificially increase their assumed interest rate and increase their amortization periods. By allowing unrealistic assumptions, this select subset of newspaper pension plans would be able to shift tens of millions of dollars in otherwise required pension contributions into their own profits.

This provision would make community newspaper employees’ retirements less secure.
If we believe we need to prop up community newspapers, I would prefer tax credits to tampering with employer pension contributions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 06:30 PM
 
18,047 posts, read 15,639,191 times
Reputation: 26761
Another article that is trying to get people riled up but is not law (yet) and is an opinion piece on top of that. Bait avoided.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 08:04 PM
 
192 posts, read 133,606 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohio_peasant View Post
Exactly. Though this assertion might be lost on some, a major point of retirement-savings isn't the funding of one's own retirement, but to build a dynasty, over the course of generations. Working-class people save, enabling their children to build comfortable lives of considerable savings. The children do likewise, in proportion, for their own children. And so forth, across the generations. Millionaires beget billionaires.

Contrary to popular belief, the principal tension in the tax-code isn't over dispossession of the middle-class or working-class, in favor of the indigent. It's the perpetual struggle between billionaires and mere millionaires. The millionaires want to supplant the billionaires. The billionaires want to keep the millionaires in their place.

Waxing a bit poetic here, and ranging off-topic... revolutions don't happen by peasants revolting. They happen when the gentry and lower-nobility see opportunity to overthrow the upper-nobility. This is what happened in the English revolution, and the French, and the Russian. All of the leading revolutionaries led comfortable, privileged lives. They didn't emerge from the coal-mines shouting slogans about workers uniting. The workers had no say. Those who did have a say, weren't workers. They were aristocrats themselves, albeit junior ones, who wanted more.

It is not coincidental that tax policy tends in particular to penalize the merely affluent, as opposed to the very-rich. And while the current example is not a major matter, and not one that merits vehement agitation or impassioned call-to-arms, it is nevertheless illustrative of a pattern.

Now back to grousing why international stocks keep lagging American ones...
This is the most accurate assessment I’ve read on C-D to date. In my circle we refer to them as the “I’ve got mine” liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Haiku
7,132 posts, read 4,764,363 times
Reputation: 10327
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysr_racer View Post
Unfortunately it also raises the taxes of whoever inherited it.
I personally don't have a problem with that. Tax-deferred plans are just that - taxes are paid later. That does not mean "not at all". In the best of all worlds your taxes are deferred until after you are dead. So somebody still has to pay them. The heir can always refuse to accept it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2019, 03:57 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,631,684 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
Less wind is helpful, which brings in that fine silica, that powdery film that collects on your cars, which goes into your lungs. Las Vegas is a windy city, 9.2MPH average annual windspeeds, and they could get wind blasters to 70MPH. I haven't experienced that here in Tucson, at least in my first year here.
Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top