Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The data shows just one healthy adult retiring just one year later in life resulted in an 11% less likely chance of morality.
1) I assume you mean "mortality" instead of morality.
2) mortality rate is the same for everyone --100%. I guess you meant 11% longer life. But does that apply to the entire life span, or just retirement years? For instance, 11% of 60 years is 6.6 years. 11% of 20 years of retirement is 2.2 years. And you'd be working for one of those years.
The thread title is "Do any of you have first hand knowledge of the earlier one retires the Earlier one is likely to die".
That seems to be asking for anecdotes.
Retired at 65, now 72. Zero health problems, despite 2 knee replacements.
I raise all our own food - not just gardening, but livestock too. I got into it gradually and now find it isn't that much work. I still plow snow, do all the maintenance on the trucks, train our dogs, and grill baby back ribs. I do not go out of my way to "exercise". I spend most of my days outdoors in all seasons, and still get up at 4:30 am.
Do any of you have first hand knowledge of the earlier one retires the Earlier one is likely to die?
Nope. I retired at 52 and I'm still alive at 71. I am not particularly blessed with good genes based on family history. I probably have had less stress for the past twenty years.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.