U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 01-10-2009, 09:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee
6,739 posts, read 3,744,840 times
Reputation: 3448
LauraC has a reputation beyond repute
LauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond repute
Default Treasury Suggests Increasing Social Security Retirement Ages

I saw this brief article this morning and thought I would share:

planadviser - Treasury Suggests Increasing Social Security Retirement Ages

At the bottom of the article is a link to the 28 page Social Security Reform: Work Incentives Issue Brief 6 from the Treasury Department.

I'm not under Social Security so I have no opinion...but I would if I was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2009, 10:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
14,180 posts, read 6,317,908 times
Reputation: 2626
texdav has a reputation beyond repute
texdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond repute
Really nothing new just as the Breaks committee did a long number of hearings on this a few years ago. In the end Congress really did nothing and is not likely to until several decades past and it gets to where SS gets closer to were pay go doesn't cover cost. That was the position of the Democrats and now they are in charge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 11:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee
6,739 posts, read 3,744,840 times
Reputation: 3448
LauraC has a reputation beyond repute
LauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond reputeLauraC has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Really nothing new just as the Breaks committee did a long number of hearings on this a few years ago. In the end Congress really did nothing and is not likely to until several decades past and it gets to where SS gets closer to were pay go doesn't cover cost. That was the position of the Democrats and now they are in charge.
I think they will raise the SS age this non-election year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 11:50 AM
Emancipated!
Status: "2 weeks >6 days!!!!" (set 1 day ago)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, for now
3,237 posts, read 2,607,296 times
Reputation: 1204
Tesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud ofTesaje has much to be proud of
Treasury at this date is not what it will be in few short weeks. The changing of the guard will change such political pronouncements so what Paulson says is meaningless at this late date.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WA
2,281 posts, read 2,852,140 times
Reputation: 680
cdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to behold
It is good that they continue to do serious work to understand the impact of these programs in this economy. Ignoring the problems or the continued political sniping helps no one.

My retirement plan was developed around a SS plan that would pay me full benefits at 66 but I can probably find a way to make a one year delay work. What I probably would have trouble with is proposals to 'means test' the benefits as that not only changes the program nature but would then be tinkered with by Congress on a regular basis.

For many of us it is the economy that is the major factor in employment decisions, not SS benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 02:32 PM
Monitor
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: santa cruz california
4,352 posts, read 3,406,284 times
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation: 1428
nancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud ofnancy thereader has much to be proud of
Send a message via ICQ to nancy thereader Send a message via AIM to nancy thereader Send a message via Yahoo to nancy thereader
OMG, I have five days before my first check comes so please don't let them start on Monday.
__________________
******************

Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 06:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: san antonio, texas
2,953 posts, read 1,765,292 times
Reputation: 840
wehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to beholdwehotex is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
I saw this brief article this morning and thought I would share:

planadviser - Treasury Suggests Increasing Social Security Retirement Ages

At the bottom of the article is a link to the 28 page Social Security Reform: Work Incentives Issue Brief 6 from the Treasury Department.

I'm not under Social Security so I have no opinion...but I would if I was.

they could start by eliminating ALL welfare, social security, medicare benefits for legal immigrants who come here to this country at advanced ages. what exactly did they ever contribute to the system? yet they qualify for social security, SSI and ultimately medicare. it is a slap in the face to anyone who has contributed to "the system" all of their working years, only to have a johnny come lately immigrant come and get more than his fair share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 07:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
14,180 posts, read 6,317,908 times
Reputation: 2626
texdav has a reputation beyond repute
texdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesaje View Post
Treasury at this date is not what it will be in few short weeks. The changing of the guard will change such political pronouncements so what Paulson says is meaningless at this late date.

The Democrats will never have the guts to tackle SS as they haven't in the past. Seantor Breaux was a democrt and he got no where . But the next preasdient will be warned about the short fall in the future by teh office of managemnent and budget as required by law and he must respond just as Bush did with a proposal by law.All suddies have shown that eithyer huge payroll tax increases o0r reductions in benefiots are all that will help now has they did the increase age the last time and it hasn't worked. They woul;d probaly have to increrase it to 70 and that won't pass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 08:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia (soon Ellsworth)
651 posts, read 433,067 times
Reputation: 282
boonelsewhere is a jewel in the roughboonelsewhere is a jewel in the roughboonelsewhere is a jewel in the roughboonelsewhere is a jewel in the roughboonelsewhere is a jewel in the roughboonelsewhere is a jewel in the rough
what they should be doing is remove the cap on the SS contribution that will bring some more money to fund SS payout,
i don't think those high paying salary would mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 10:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
14,180 posts, read 6,317,908 times
Reputation: 2626
texdav has a reputation beyond repute
texdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond reputetexdav has a reputation beyond repute
That would not raise the amount that is need even then. In the end what I think they will do is to raise the payroll deduction and the retirement age again.There is also talk about setting up some type of tax deduction for more savings.Remember this is a trust fund;be it a trust fund that would be ilegal if not the government running it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top