Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2013, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,465 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheShadow View Post
Property tax and state income tax are still only 2 parts of the tax burden paid by folks. ..
Correct.

'Tax Burden' usually includes all state revenue from all sources: individual income taxes, property taxes, hunting licenses, fishing licenses, permit fees, and corporate taxes, employer taxes, etc], and then divides that by the number of state residents.

The problem with 'Tax Burden' in conversation is that it is often used to imply the costs to individuals in the state.

If conversation is intended to include corporate and employer expenses, then fine.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2013, 02:35 PM
 
Location: East TN
11,128 posts, read 9,760,240 times
Reputation: 40539
I was speaking from an individual perspective. As in the tax 'burden' I shoulder personally. I didn't mean to use a broader term including corporate, or employer taxes, so you make a valid point in my use of the word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2013, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,465 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
I understand.

When we look at websites using statistics, the phrase 'Tax Burden' is oft used by various sites in a specific context. I know that the state I moved to for retirement, has an very high 'Tax Burden' according to the statistics.

However those statistics include the corporate and business burden, and are not reflective of the individual 'burden'.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2013, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,907,290 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheShadow View Post
Property tax and state income tax are still only 2 parts of the tax burden paid by folks. Here is a website (disclaimer: there are a lot of them that differ somewhat) that rates the total tax burden by state. Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed
Low taxes and COL are not the main reason a retiree should chose a location though, again just a piece of the puzzle. You need to really love the place you move to for other reasons or you'll be bored or unhappy with your choice.
Thanks for linking that website, which I found interesting. For the benefit of others who may give it a quick look without scrutinizing too much, I will comment that it reflects state taxation only, not local. So for example Texas ranks 50th - dead last in "tax-burdensomeness". My conclusion is that most of property taxation in Texas must be local (as opposed to state-wide), as I have read too many Texans complaining on C-D about their high property taxes. I am not claiming the list is not useful, not at all, just that it's important to realize what it's showing and what it's not showing. Another example of that would be the extent to which sales taxes can vary in different parts of a state depending on what localities have voted to tax themselves for. In some states sales taxes may not vary much from lowest to highest localities but in other states there can be greater differences.

I was also interested to note that California ranks 9th. I have always readily admitted that Calif. is a high-tax state. But what I have argued against is the notion that somehow Calif. is the worst of the worst, an unimaginable tax hell. Your list puts that in perspective - eight states are worse.

I like, and agree with, your final paragraph.

Last edited by Yac; 11-08-2013 at 07:02 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2013, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Idaho
6,357 posts, read 7,768,830 times
Reputation: 14183
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheShadow View Post
Property tax and state income tax are still only 2 parts of the tax burden paid by folks. Here is a website (disclaimer: there are a lot of them that differ somewhat) that rates the total tax burden by state. Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed

Low taxes and COL are not the main reason a retiree should chose a location though, again just a piece of the puzzle. You need to really love the place you move to for other reasons or you'll be bored or unhappy with your choice.
This State Master web site confuses me. I spent about two hours this afternoon going through various pages and nowhere can I find their methodology about how they computed the tax burden, other than to say that they don't include local or federal taxes.

They list Wyoming as having the second highest tax burden, per capita, after Hawai'i. We've all known that Hawai'i has high taxes, along with everything else being more expensive, partly due to the cost of getting things over there from the mainland. But, Wyoming at number two, and very close to Hawai'i? At every other web site I've seen, Wyoming is always listed as one of the most tax friendly states, always in the top-10.

I also agree with your last paragraph. Wyoming and Idaho, (the focus of my research), are stunningly beautiful. I'm really looking forward to the adventure. Now, if I can only survive the long, harsh winters?

Last edited by Yac; 11-08-2013 at 06:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: East TN
11,128 posts, read 9,760,240 times
Reputation: 40539
Yeah, I'm not saying that's a great site. It was one I selected at random, as an example, from the many sites that compare and rank state taxes on the whole, rather than just looking at property tax, or just state income tax. Also, it's good to recognize that low taxes may mean that some government services are not funded. Better make sure that what is important to you is funded. It's definitely important to research the heck out of anywhere you are considering for your retirement destination, and not just the state, but down to the local level. Visit that location in both good and bad times of year, to see if you can deal with the worst it has to offer. Talk to locals on your visits and ask them lots of questions. One question I like to ask is what is the one thing that bugs them about the area, or what they would change if they were all-powerful. I was always surprised at the responses.

I am so happy with our choice, and the other transplants that live near me are too. We talk to people everyday, even those who've lived here for years and they still say how great it is too live in such a beautiful place with such great neighbors. Low COL and taxes were some of our original motivations, but they have really become secondary to our daily joy in living here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2013, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Idaho
6,357 posts, read 7,768,830 times
Reputation: 14183
Yeah. Not the best web site. They cite a source, but really doesn't. For example, they will cite the U.S. Census Bureau as their source, then link to the home page of the census bureau. Anyone who has ever visited that site looking for something will know that it is a massive site and their data is not "user friendly".

I'm taking the second and third weeks of December to visit my possible retirement locations. I know what they are like in the spring and summer, (fantastic), but not in the dead of winter. Trying to come up with an itinerary before I go. In addition to places to spend some time, I need to compile a list of who to see. People like realtors, city planning departments, college deans, churches, and anyone else I should be talking to.

I like your idea of asking what residents would change about where they live. That's a good one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2021, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Charleston Area SC
3 posts, read 1,710 times
Reputation: 25
My teacher pension is from NJ, when I moved to SC the tax went to SC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2021, 03:28 PM
 
534 posts, read 480,996 times
Reputation: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by volosong View Post
This State Master web site confuses me. I spent about two hours this afternoon going through various pages and nowhere can I find their methodology about how they computed the tax burden, other than to say that they don't include local or federal taxes.

They list Wyoming as having the second highest tax burden, per capita, after Hawai'i. We've all known that Hawai'i has high taxes, along with everything else being more expensive, partly due to the cost of getting things over there from the mainland. But, Wyoming at number two, and very close to Hawai'i? At every other web site I've seen, Wyoming is always listed as one of the most tax friendly states, always in the top-10.

I also agree with your last paragraph. Wyoming and Idaho, (the focus of my research), are stunningly beautiful. I'm really looking forward to the adventure. Now, if I can only survive the long, harsh winters?
Hawaii being the #1 is pretty shocking to me, to live in Hawaii as a primary residence, your tax burden is relatively low. Pensions aren't taxed. Distributions of employer contributions to 401k are not taxed. There are huge property tax exemptions for owner occupied. It's expensive, sure, but I wouldn't consider it to be heavily taxed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2021, 03:29 PM
 
534 posts, read 480,996 times
Reputation: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arlene.JW View Post
My teacher pension is from NJ, when I moved to SC the tax went to SC.
Uh...you bumped a thread from 8 years ago!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top