Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Den Mathias
Nope, i am not kidding about the gangs. Most large states have them as they follow the illegal population that has moved into the US. You are blessed to live in an area that apparently has not been touched by this influx.
A friend's Mother has a home in a small farming town in California's Central Valley. She has been moved to a care home and in the 4 months she has been gone the house has been broken into 2 times. Each time more furniture, household goods were taken. The family is struggling to clean out the house before it is all gone. The town has only about 14,000 people but the majority are transient. To leave your home unlocked or to leave an untended car with the keys in the visor is an impossiblity!
So enjoy your part of paradise.
|
I understand, I grew up in the San Joaquin Valley. My siblings all settled between Stockton, Fresno and Yosemite.
My Dw and I choose here instead as where we wanted to settle, after a long search.
Each adult chooses where they will live. So each adult should take the responsibility for having made that decision.
Different areas do have different crime-rates, in my travels during my career, I have seen a very wide spectrum of crime-rates.
However I believe that crime and how a person experiences crime is often a function of population density [also going along with this is cost-of-living and taxes].
Even if everyone everywhere had the same exact crime rate per capita [which we don't have], when you put 5,000 people living on the same block in tenements with each other, they would experience dozens of minor crimes every day and a major crime every week. To them the crime-rate would be very high.
If you put 10 people on that same block, they would be living with much more elbow room. They would experience a minor crime once or twice a year, and a major crime once a decade.
In each case, even if their crime-rate was identical per capita, how they experience crime will be entirely different.
Stockton has +290k people in 75 sq miles. That is roughly 3,800 people per square mile. [a lot of people]
My town has 253 people within 27 square miles, 9.3 people per square mile. [We harvest more deer annually than we have people]
We could have double the crime-rate of Stockton, yet our experience of that crime-rate would still be far less than how crime is experienced in Stockton.
[I know that I am talking a bunch here about Stockton, I truly mean no insult to Stockton, I mean no insult to folks who live in Stockton. I was only using Stockton as an example to illustrate a point]
Anyone can choose to live in a small rural town, where they will experience a much lower effect of crime [and a lower cost-of-living and lower taxes].
Within the context of retirement [since this is being said within a retirement sub-forum] when we each retire, we choose where we wish to retire to.
We can each choose to retire in an urban [high cost-of-living, high-crime, high-tax] environment; or we can choose to retire in a rural environment.
The choice belongs to each of us.
May God bless you.
