|

06-22-2009, 05:55 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee
6,490 posts, read 3,566,545 times
Reputation: 3356
|
|
Suspending Social Security Benefits
'For every year between full retirement age and 70 that recipients delay taking benefits, the Social Security Administration will increase their monthly benefit checks by 8%.'
Article ends with Q & A from readers.
More on Suspending Social Security - WSJ.com
|
|

06-23-2009, 06:57 PM
|
|
Be careful what you ask for...
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Antonio
3,675 posts, read 2,580,178 times
Reputation: 10565
|
|
|
So now I guess you just need to figure out your odds of living those additional years to make it pay off...if you are healthy and swimming in the correct gene pool, that is a great deal.
|
|

06-23-2009, 08:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
1,490 posts, read 465,135 times
Reputation: 1031
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paka
So now I guess you just need to figure out your odds of living those additional years to make it pay off...if you are healthy and swimming in the correct gene pool, that is a great deal.
|
I am seriously thinking of doing that not for me but for my wife.
At 66 I am projected to receive around $1800 and my wife should get $900 social security and $300 from a small state pension. $3000 a month and we should be able to live comfortably but should I die she loses her ss, taks mine and will receive $2100. I am worried on this.
Yes, we have IRA's and other retirement savings but I am structuring our retirement as if we didn't have those savings.
If I work just four more years my ss benefit should be around $2400 a month... an extra $600 a month which for a lady living on her own can make a world of difference.
|
|

06-23-2009, 08:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: TX
2,051 posts, read 492,698 times
Reputation: 2132
|
|
|
Nicet4,
Actually, she will retain her own SSA benes and an amount of yours will be added to hers to bring it up to the $2100.00. She will retain her Medicare with her SSN and an "A" after it. All her correspondence from the agency will have her SSN on it. She made enough under SSA to qualifiy as a primary and she will continue to be the primary.
Check to make sure that her SSA won't be offset by receipt of a state pension. When you call tell them you need info about "windfall offset" and "GPO." (government pension offset).
|
|

06-25-2009, 09:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
13,836 posts, read 5,931,312 times
Reputation: 2507
|
|
|
From what I read she will get the larger amount of either yours or hers if you die. Same with you if she dies.
|
|

06-26-2009, 05:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
4,224 posts, read 1,868,214 times
Reputation: 1416
|
|
|
i wrote this before but it bears repeating:
as far as taking social security,ill wait as long as i can.. heres my thought:
for evey year i wait its like getting an extra 8% raise...
forget the old school thinking about what if i die or what age will i break even..thats thinking from our parents generation
current thinking is if you have the resourses(assets) to delay taking it, instead of say withdrawing 4% of your inflation adjusted nest egg each year take say 6% right from day 1... why?
because if you live long enough to collect you have the comfort of knowing your nest egg will be replenished with about 30% more in payments later on refilling the extra dough your pulling out now so you have more money each year while your still healthy and able to enjoy alot of things you may not be able to do later on..
think of it as almost as if your buying an annuity with the money you lay out between 62 and 70 that will give you or your spouse a lifetime of higher payments...
your nest egg will be refilled starting at age 70 with a much larger stream of money and that will go on forever...
to me its not about dying with the biggest pile of money but rather living the best darn life we can while we can.
to me retirement isnt about surviving and getting by... its about enjoying the fruits of a lifetime of work,savings and sacrafice and living better now then before
|
|

06-26-2009, 06:59 PM
|
|
Monitor
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: santa cruz california
4,335 posts, read 3,272,247 times
Reputation: 1403
|
|
|
I know that is how many people think and that it is probably a smart thing to do , but I just took the money as soon as I could which was the max for someone who was just 62 . Look at poor Farrah Fawcett who is just my age. We never know what the future might hold for us.
For me, it was just take the money and run..........
__________________
******************
Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.
|
|

06-27-2009, 02:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
4,224 posts, read 1,868,214 times
Reputation: 1416
|
|
|
Again its not about hoping you live long enough to collect at 70, its about being able to spend more of your own nest egg right at age 62 then you otherwise would be able to because if you do live a very long time you wont run out of money because you will have a way way larger payment kick in at 70 replenishing your nest egg at a higher rate..
its all about being able to draw more right from day 1, not about betting will you live long enough to collect?
instead of a 4% withdrawl rate a year by taking ss at 62 wouldnt it be nice to have 50% more of a withdrawl rate right at age 62 by waiting to collect at 70??
its win win, you get to spend more and do more of the things you like to do when your younger and healthier because you can spend more of your savings if you wait, and if you die ? well then you dont have to worry about collecting ha ha but if your spouse survives you she will get a bigger check...
the problem is folks think only in terms of living log enough to collect at 70 instead of thinking outside the box and saying im going to spend alot more prior to age 70 because if i do live long enough to collect ill have whopper of a check coming in....its the cheapest annuity you can buy... no annuity can come close to what waiting costs vs buying an annuity to kick in at age 70 for the same amount
Last edited by mathjak107; 06-27-2009 at 03:37 AM..
|
|

06-27-2009, 07:47 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
4,495 posts, read 2,019,518 times
Reputation: 5142
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nancy thereader
I know that is how many people think and that it is probably a smart thing to do , but I just took the money as soon as I could which was the max for someone who was just 62 . Look at poor Farrah Fawcett who is just my age. We never know what the future might hold for us.
For me, it was just take the money and run..........
|
I drew at age 62 also
10 years ago I would have said --" never"-- to drawing early.
The grind of working and seeing employers demand more and more with no extra wage increase, more being called in on short notice, more being switched around on working schedules------ enough !
I worked hard since age 17, made good wages, worked unusual shifts, but the SS benefits at age 62 were too good to pass up.
Now, 2 years later, I have no regrets whatsoever.
|
|

06-27-2009, 09:41 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
7,082 posts, read 2,607,156 times
Reputation: 1870
|
|
|
This is all using the probable fallacy about social security continuing indefinitely. You actually need to plan retirement as if it's not going to be there for you, and if it is, consider it bonus money.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|