Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2009, 09:11 AM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,016,652 times
Reputation: 29930

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
In the civilian LEO community it is common for officers to have a pension available to them after 20 years. I was not aware of an age requirement.

It is also common, for any prior military service to be 'counted' into your 20 year career in LEO. They simply want you to contribute into the pension fund to make up for those years.

So if a LEO had served in the military for 6 years, and then went to work in a civilian PD; he could pay into their pension fund 6-years worth [automatic allotments from his paycheck], and after 14 years in that PD he would become eligible for their 20-year pension.
I'm sorry but that is not correct as far as federal law enforcement retirement is concerned. Even someone with military service as an MP for example, would still need to put in 20 years as a civilian law enfrocement officer in order to be eligible to retire under the enhanced provisions of CSRS or FERS hazardous duty retirement.

Although the military service will be credited, it is only AFTER the 20 years of civilian FERS service is accomplished.

I have no knowledge of how municipal government retirement systems are structured, so I don't answer those types of questions with information that may be erroneous. However, I am an expert on federal retirement and am well-qualified to address those issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2009, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414
Feel free to insist that such does not happen.

My last tour of duty was doing LEO work. I joined one of the LEO unions while on that duty station [FOP]. As a F.O.P. member here stateside I have attended a few of their meetings, and I have been rubbing elbows with civilian LEO at those meetings.

One of my elder brothers did 6 years in the Army [doing intell work] followed by a civilian LEO career. His Army time did count in that civilian PD, which is the norm within the LEO community coast-to-coast. He did pay into their pension fund, to contribute into it to make up for those years. After 14 years in that PD he did become eligible for their 20-year pension, and he did retire on that pension. Just as thousands of other LEOs do nationwide.

I was offered [via my F.O.P. connections] a follow-on civilian LEO career. Most of my military career was not LEO related [I only did 2 tours of LEO duties]. I was told that I could have contributed to their pension fund to account for some of my military career time. However it was never made clear to me, if there would be a limit to how many years of my military career would 'count' for their civilian pension. It was guessed that a former US servicemember could likely do up to 50% of the civilian LEO department's normal time, but nobody there seemed to know for certain. I did not accept the offer [I like being retired] and today they do not have any openings due to the economy.

I know many LEO who have done this, and a few who are doing this. As well as my own brother who did it. And I have been offered the option of doing such myself.

I do not know much about the FERS system. I am only familiar with the Federal DOD's system and how municipal PDs seem to handle their LEO.

Retiring at a 'young' age is great!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2009, 12:13 PM
 
Location: DC Area, for now
3,517 posts, read 13,260,698 times
Reputation: 2192
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
Feel free to insist that such does not happen.

My last tour of duty was doing LEO work. I joined one of the LEO unions while on that duty station [FOP]. As a F.O.P. member here stateside I have attended a few of their meetings, and I have been rubbing elbows with civilian LEO at those meetings.

One of my elder brothers did 6 years in the Army [doing intell work] followed by a civilian LEO career. His Army time did count in that civilian PD, which is the norm within the LEO community coast-to-coast. He did pay into their pension fund, to contribute into it to make up for those years. After 14 years in that PD he did become eligible for their 20-year pension, and he did retire on that pension. Just as thousands of other LEOs do nationwide.

I was offered [via my F.O.P. connections] a follow-on civilian LEO career. Most of my military career was not LEO related [I only did 2 tours of LEO duties]. I was told that I could have contributed to their pension fund to account for some of my military career time. However it was never made clear to me, if there would be a limit to how many years of my military career would 'count' for their civilian pension. It was guessed that a former US servicemember could likely do up to 50% of the civilian LEO department's normal time, but nobody there seemed to know for certain. I did not accept the offer [I like being retired] and today they do not have any openings due to the economy.

I know many LEO who have done this, and a few who are doing this. As well as my own brother who did it. And I have been offered the option of doing such myself.

I do not know much about the FERS system. I am only familiar with the Federal DOD's system and how municipal PDs seem to handle their LEO.

Retiring at a 'young' age is great!

Nobody is disputing your own experience. Only that it is not the same for everybody across the board in the federal Civil Service as well as all municipalities across the nation. Your specific retirement and LEO experience is a relatively small subset of the over all public servant benefit structure and it affords a higher benefit at a younger age than most can qualify for. I'm glad it works out for you, but I do not have the same options and would not unless I followed the exact same path.

That you could not get a clear answer to your own prospect of civilian LEO employment benefits should tell you something. The federal civil service rules are clear cut and fully public. They apply to everyone who meets the criteria. Municipalities do whatever they set up and have nothing to do with the federal civilian service. If they allow military time to count, they do so because they decided to do so. They are not obligated by anything the federal govt. does. Furthermore, state and local employment does not count towards subsequent federal retirements at all. There is no pay back option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2009, 01:04 PM
 
59,040 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14281
I was talking to my daughter the other day on the phone. She asked me, "what did you do today?"
I replied, "nothing". She then asked, "what are you going to do tomorrow?" I replied, "I haven't finished yesterday's job".

Love retirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2009, 01:32 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
I'm sorry but that is not correct as far as federal law enforcement retirement is concerned. Even someone with military service as an MP for example, would still need to put in 20 years as a civilian law enfrocement officer in order to be eligible to retire under the enhanced provisions of CSRS or FERS hazardous duty retirement.

Although the military service will be credited, it is only AFTER the 20 years of civilian FERS service is accomplished.

I have no knowledge of how municipal government retirement systems are structured, so I don't answer those types of questions with information that may be erroneous. However, I am an expert on federal retirement and am well-qualified to address those issues.

That really depends on the retirement system. In Texas you can buy you military time into the system and its increased by matching by employer . In 20 years combined time you can retire or any time your 60. This is with the Texas municpal retirement system.Many counties systems are different. There is even alot of local options such as rate of comtibtuion by per cenatge;how its matched and COL.In my system the employeee contibutes all the money until he/she retires . The the city double that amount and provide COL.When the system makes over 5% interest for a year it also distributes a formulaed extra checks at the end of year to retirees beyond the fixed amount for guranteed annuity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2009, 02:00 PM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,016,652 times
Reputation: 29930
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
I'm sorry but that is not correct as far as federal law enforcement retirement is concerned. Even someone with military service as an MP for example, would still need to put in 20 years as a civilian law enfrocement officer in order to be eligible to retire under the enhanced provisions of CSRS or FERS hazardous duty retirement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
That really depends on the retirement system. In Texas you can buy you military time into the system and its increased by matching by employer . In 20 years combined time you can retire or any time your 60. This is with the Texas municpal retirement system.Many counties systems are different. There is even alot of local options such as rate of comtibtuion by per cenatge;how its matched and COL.In my system the employeee contibutes all the money until he/she retires . The the city double that amount and provide COL.When the system makes over 5% interest for a year it also distributes a formulaed extra checks at the end of year to retirees beyond the fixed amount for guranteed annuity.
I'm only going to state this one more time.

I have highlighted the relevant part of my post to once again point out that I am referring to the FEDERAL retirement systems.

Not Texas.

Not any municipalities.

F - E - D - E - R - A - L.

You need 20 years of federal civilian service in a position designated as hazardous duty in order to retire under the special enhanced provisions of hazardous duty/law enforcement.

This really shouldn't be that hard of a concept to grasp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2009, 06:10 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,037,032 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
I think the key is to stay active and do things that are meaningful to you. In that sense, you'll never be retired, whether you are being paid for it or not.

But if all you do is sit home and watch TV most of the time, then it is better to work.
Glad you have a perspective on what works for YOU. I am sure others have a plan that is different and works for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2009, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
9,532 posts, read 16,515,499 times
Reputation: 14570
Quote:
Originally Posted by insertusernamehere View Post
Has anyone had second thoughts of retiring too early?

I retired at 55. Some of my co-workers thought that was a bad decision saying that was too early to retire, but I could afford to getting a full pension after 34 years of service. That was two years ago and I find I don't miss work at all. I enjoy my free time golfing and travelling. I have a casual position driving cars for a dealership and do that when I am not busy for something to do and it gives me some extra cash.
I did the same thing, retiring at an early age. I retired from the Federal Gov't. I do however work part time for a car rental agency. I work 3 days a week and can take off when I want to. I do keep my time off to a minimum right now though due to the sluggish economy, and the fact the company has been laying off.

I do not miss having a full time career at all anymore after 31 years with the Gov't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,008,695 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
FERS is an acronym for the Federal Employees Retirement System and covers civilian employees employed by the federal government since the mid 1980s. It is a three-tiered retirement system that consists of a basic annuity, a 401(k) style plan in which the government contributes up to 5% of salary depending upon the employee's contribution, and Social Security. Since FERS employees can retire in their 50s, they receive a special supplement until they are eligible for Social Security at age 62. The formula for the annuity is roughly 1% of an employee's highest three years averaged earnings for each year worked.

With regard to the other statement about the federal government requiring 20 years of service for a pension, that only applies to military retirees. Civilian employees can retire with as little as 5 years of employment if they are at least 62. They can also retire at their minimum retirement age (55-57 depending upon their DOB) with as little as 10 years of service. This is referred to as MRA +10, but there is a reduction in the annuity formula for people who retire under this provision. People in hazardous duty positions (law enforcement, fire fighters, etc.) can retire with 20 years service, but they have to be at least 50 years old. They can retire at any age with 25 years of service. For most civilian employees, full retirement constitutes 30 years of service with retirement eligibility at their MRA.

That is a brief explanation of the current federal retirement system without getting into all of the nuances. I hope that explanation has been beneficial.
Has FERs been in existence for 30 years, yet? It could just be people (non-hazardous, non-law enforcement, non-militay) I know under FERS don't have 30 years of service even if they are older than I am. Then they wouldn't get the special supplement until they're SS eligible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 02:40 PM
 
Location: DC Area, for now
3,517 posts, read 13,260,698 times
Reputation: 2192
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Has FERs been in existence for 30 years, yet? It could just be people (non-hazardous, non-law enforcement, non-militay) I know under FERS don't have 30 years of service even if they are older than I am. Then they wouldn't get the special supplement until they're SS eligible.
No, FERS is not 30 years old. But some people converted to it who would have age and years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top