|

08-15-2009, 08:39 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
5,799 posts, read 1,498,547 times
Reputation: 1687
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda
Well, let's see.
You don't like the FED.
You don't like politicians.
And, you don't like Real Estates (sic).
How do you feel about corporate entities?
You can switch your TSP from the G Fund to the F Fund and invest in corporate bonds instead of government securities.
Over the last 12 months (Aug - July), the F Fund returned 7.87%, as opposed to the G Fund's 3.19%.
Of course, historical returns don't guarantee future etc. etc.
But this way, you won't have to worry about the FED. (Or have it as a convenient bogeyman.)
|
If you look at what the FED has done to the Actuarial Requirements for a Retirement Income you might understand. If I needed an income of $4,000 a month how much money do I need in CDs rather than the amount needed at the 5.3% I could get 2 years ago. As for the TSP, I am already retired and will be required to start pulling money out in a couple years.
It's not that I dislike Real Estate's but they don't seem to have learned a thing from the Calamity they brought upon this nation. Sorry if I offended you 
|
|

08-15-2009, 09:00 AM
|
|
TANSTAAFL!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal desert
2,180 posts, read 710,419 times
Reputation: 2472
|
|
Completely off-topic
mathjak107, I like most of your posts, but your continual use of ellipses ( ... ) drive my poor old eyes NUTS.

|
|

08-15-2009, 09:27 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
1,945 posts, read 623,997 times
Reputation: 306
|
|
|
So why do retired folk who rely on CD's as income even bother at 1.5%? Apt. units would be a better investment at this point. And why aren't the banks losing deposits hand over fist at these ridiculous rates?
|
|

08-15-2009, 09:32 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
757 posts, read 408,867 times
Reputation: 475
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte
So why do retired folk who rely on CD's as income even bother at 1.5%?.... And why aren't the banks losing deposits hand over fist at these ridiculous rates?
|
Because people have an irrational fear of investing their money in any product that is not 100% guaranteed and insured by the U.S. government.
It is the same reason that at the height of the financial crisis people were actually buying Treauries with a zero return just to have a safe place to keep their money.
|
|

08-15-2009, 09:38 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
757 posts, read 408,867 times
Reputation: 475
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa
If you look at what the FED has done to the Actuarial Requirements for a Retirement Income you might understand. If I needed an income of $4,000 a month how much money do I need in CDs rather than the amount needed at the 5.3% I could get 2 years ago. As for the TSP, I am already retired and will be required to start pulling money out in a couple years.
It's not that I dislike Real Estate's but they don't seem to have learned a thing from the Calamity they brought upon this nation. Sorry if I offended you
|
The FED has done no such thing. You are just afraid to invest your money in instruments that carry a higher rate of return. (And whose rate, by the way, is not impacted by FED action or inaction.)
You did not offend me. If you had, I simply would have ignored your post rather than try to assist you by pointing out how you could increase the rate of return in your TSP account by investing in corporate bonds.
|
|

08-15-2009, 09:40 AM
|
|
Emancipated!
Status:
"Ahhhhh! Life is good."
(set 6 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, for now
3,301 posts, read 3,046,800 times
Reputation: 1311
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda
Thanks for posting that link (although I think that it may eventually be removed as a TOS violation). I've already perused several threads over there this morning, although I'm not to the point of passing judgment on their collective intellect yet. 
|
Me too - very interesting reading on many topics.  Thanks
|
|

08-15-2009, 12:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
4,935 posts, read 2,583,727 times
Reputation: 1821
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda
Because people have an irrational fear of investing their money in any product that is not 100% guaranteed and insured by the U.S. government.
It is the same reason that at the height of the financial crisis people were actually buying Treauries with a zero return just to have a safe place to keep their money.
|
forget the interest rate at the height it was all about the capital gains.... the long bond fund i had was paying 2.87 % .... that was nothing compared to the over 28% in capital gains i made on them.... i actually started to speculate with TLT the fund.... every time the stock market rose they would fall 2 or 3 % ...id buy them and wait for a down day in stocks which was easy since the treasuries moved the opposite and make 2-3% every trade..... i must have done it 16 times in a year .....
foreigners bought them up as weak dollar currancy plays.....
alot was bought just because a foreigner who is awaiting re-investment something in the american exchanges needs a place to just store it.... dont forget money markets had trillions in money...they also had to buy them since no one trusted other banks
little was about the interest rate i think, those were horrible . most of the big money was in for other reasons or by default and thats why even at almost zero the us treasuries market is still so strong
just look at our 30 year bond... 4-1/2% its priced at looking 30 years out.... it averaged 5-6% almost for ever .... its amazing even with all this spending the bond market dosnt fear this hyper inflation we all see....
Last edited by mathjak107; 08-15-2009 at 01:00 PM..
|
|

08-16-2009, 01:53 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
4,935 posts, read 2,583,727 times
Reputation: 1821
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa
If you look at what the FED has done to the Actuarial Requirements for a Retirement Income you might understand. If I needed an income of $4,000 a month how much money do I need in CDs rather than the amount needed at the 5.3% I could get 2 years ago. As for the TSP, I am already retired and will be required to start pulling money out in a couple years.
It's not that I dislike Real Estate's but they don't seem to have learned a thing from the Calamity they brought upon this nation. Sorry if I offended you 
|
after taxes and inflation cd's are a guaranteed loss, and thats true at almost every interest rate . everything is proportional and related.... a 4-5 % return in 3% inflation is still a loss after taxes for most ... cd's are not for generating income unless you are very wealthy, they are merely holding places for the money you need to spend in the short term... your growth for spending money down the road should be generating elswhere in higher return investments .... if your to chicken to do it then you have to accept the low return not being invested gives you as well as run the risk of spending down your principal and not being able to inflation adkust your nest egg..
your 4,000 a month you need now has to be able to become 8,000 in 20 years at 3% inflation , can you get 8,000 out of your nest egg in 20 years? if not you got a real problem...
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|