Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2010, 04:23 AM
 
106,670 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159

Advertisements

most of these surveys are flawed... there is one for savings rate i saw also that showed some rediculious number that was so low,...

they only count bank accounts no other investments. can you believe coming out with a report about how little we are saving and not count all savings vehicles....

all i know is even the kids today that are working have money going into 401k's and saving. thats something our generation never even had when we were young.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2010, 04:12 PM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,018,972 times
Reputation: 29930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Then you are one oof the lucky ones, 401Ks are why most people have less than $10K. See what you have when retirement time commes, Just a way for employers to avoid ERISA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
thats baloney....
Mathjak, you are wasting your time. Lest you forgot, you are arguing with someone who continues to also insist that doctors refusing to treat Medicare patients is only an unfounded rumor meant to scare seniors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 04:45 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,040,852 times
Reputation: 14434
401(k)s Still Fall Short As A Retirement Strategy : NPR
Interesting read from March 4 on the topic

Even before the financial crisis, the average balance in 401(k)s for workers nearing retirement was just $78,000. After the market plunged, that average was reduced to about $56,000, according to Munnell's calculations. That's just not enough for a comfortable retirement, says Roger W. Ferguson Jr., president and chief executive officer of TIAA-CREF, the financial services company that offers retirement plans for employees in the academic, medical and nonprofit fields.

"Many families, at this stage, are short $250,000 from what they're going to need," Ferguson says

The above is from the link and offers a thought/perspective
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 05:09 PM
 
106,670 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159
the real problem is for most of america there just isnt enough money available from our paychecks to save to hit the serious numbers needed for living on in retirement.

it dosnt matter what vehicle is used to save or invest the amount of money that needs to be saved is huge .

we have to sustain life longer not working then we actually did working and we have to do it in away that lets us pull double the amount out every 20-25 years to buy the same things.

as even my wife and i learned very recently , its not about how big the pile of money is but what that money can generate to live on.

a million bucks in your thirties is alot of dough, you can buy a house, cars, trips etc, but that same million entering retirement is worth no more or less then your neighbor next door who has absoluetly no savings but has a cola adjusted 40,000 a year pension....... the game changes....

my wife was hesitant to retire early until we sold the last two nyc apartments. i showed her how selling the apartments and having all that cash really didnt do much to change our withdrawl rate because it wasnt about that nice lump sum but it was about what we could only earn with it. since we were already getting an income from the rent the additional we could get having that lump sum was paultry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 08:59 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,040,852 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
the real problem is for most of america there just isnt enough money available from our paychecks to save to hit the serious numbers needed for living on in retirement.

it dosnt matter what vehicle is used to save or invest the amount of money that needs to be saved is huge .

we have to sustain life longer not working then we actually did working and we have to do it in away that lets us pull double the amount out every 20-25 years to buy the same things.

as even my wife and i learned very recently , its not about how big the pile of money is but what that money can generate to live on.

a million bucks in your thirties is alot of dough, you can buy a house, cars, trips etc, but that same million entering retirement is worth no more or less then your neighbor next door who has absoluetly no savings but has a cola adjusted 40,000 a year pension....... the game changes....

my wife was hesitant to retire early until we sold the last two nyc apartments. i showed her how selling the apartments and having all that cash really didnt do much to change our withdrawl rate because it wasnt about that nice lump sum but it was about what we could only earn with it. since we were already getting an income from the rent the additional we could get having that lump sum was paultry.
Hmmmm depends on if the pension is still payable to the spouse on the death of the pensioner. The million in the bank will still be there. Also the million in the bank can be passed on in legacy money to heirs and the pension can't. They both may equate to 40K per year as income but one counts towards personal worth and the other really doesn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 09:54 PM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,018,972 times
Reputation: 29930
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Also the million in the bank can be passed on in legacy money to heirs and the pension can't.
Not necessarily.

If the retiree starts withdrawing 4%/year ($40k) and then increases the $40k by 3%/yr. to offset inflation, he will eventually start eating into the one million principal (assuming standard return on a stock/bond mixed portfolio). This standard drawdown percentage is used to increase the probability that the one million will last at least 30 years. But rest assured, barring another extremely long-term bull market, the one million will eventually be whittled down. It will not be there to be passed on to heirs unless the retiree suffers a premature death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2010, 10:15 PM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,191,954 times
Reputation: 8266
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
the real problem is for most of america there just isnt enough money available from our paychecks to save to hit the serious numbers needed for living on in retirement.

it dosnt matter what vehicle is used to save or invest the amount of money that needs to be saved is huge .

we have to sustain life longer not working then we actually did working and we have to do it in away that lets us pull double the amount out every 20-25 years to buy the same things.

as even my wife and i learned very recently , its not about how big the pile of money is but what that money can generate to live on.

a million bucks in your thirties is alot of dough, you can buy a house, cars, trips etc, but that same million entering retirement is worth no more or less then your neighbor next door who has absoluetly no savings but has a cola adjusted 40,000 a year pension....... the game changes....

my wife was hesitant to retire early until we sold the last two nyc apartments. i showed her how selling the apartments and having all that cash really didnt do much to change our withdrawl rate because it wasnt about that nice lump sum but it was about what we could only earn with it. since we were already getting an income from the rent the additional we could get having that lump sum was paultry.
In regards to paragraph #3-------"we have to sustain life longer not working than we actually did working"--

Maybe your case is an exception, but it certainly is not the norm.
I, and many people like me, started working at age 18 and retired at 62 .
( 44 years working)

I hardly doubt we will live to 106 ( 62 +44)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2010, 02:06 AM
 
106,670 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159
well i spent 34 years working, im 57 so its conceivable ill be not working longer then i did work. most pension type jobs only require 20 years of service making it really a good chance you will be retired longer then you worked.

its not true of everyone, but you get the point, you may have to be dependent on your nest egg for a very long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2010, 10:10 AM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,191,954 times
Reputation: 8266
I see your point, but how many people do you know that retired after only20 years ?

Even most military retirees start a 2nd career when they get out after 20 anddraw military retirement.

I do see your point about a nest egg disappearing.
Cash flow is more important than a stagnant nest egg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2010, 10:24 AM
 
Location: DC Area, for now
3,517 posts, read 13,261,663 times
Reputation: 2192
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
well i spent 34 years working, im 57 so its conceivable ill be not working longer then i did work. most pension type jobs only require 20 years of service making it really a good chance you will be retired longer then you worked.

its not true of everyone, but you get the point, you may have to be dependent on your nest egg for a very long time.
I don't believe this is true. Most defined benefit pensions require 30 years. Some have a reduced time as the employee gets into social security ages which figure into the reduced payout due to age. The 20 year pensions tend to be limited to high risk jobs like law enforcement where they want to encourage the middle aged to get out plus the higher risk of never collecting due to death on the job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top