U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 06-05-2010, 08:45 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
13,151 posts, read 13,004,412 times
Reputation: 4598
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
I am on pension now. My current pension is low enough that it is not taxed. My income would need to be much higher to begin being taxed.

When I do become old enough to begin getting SS, then my pension will be reduced by the amount of my SS. My total amount received will remain the same.

So even after I begin receiving SS, I will still not be paying income taxes.

SS payments are usually not enough to put you into a high income tax bracket.
Well, if you are married you can have two folks who collect over $50K in SS benefits between them, or if one gets spousal SS payments, the combination can get into the low 40K range. If you add in some pension benefit, and/or investment income or annuity, and withdrawls from a 401K type of account this can become part of a pretty nice retirement package.

In this case, and it applies to a lot of folks, the SS tax issue can become significant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 06-05-2010, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,250 posts, read 10,384,831 times
Reputation: 3587
Pay your taxes and quit gripin
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-05-2010, 09:33 PM
 
19,562 posts, read 20,849,080 times
Reputation: 7065
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
Well, if you are married you can have two folks who collect over $50K in SS benefits between them, or if one gets spousal SS payments, the combination can get into the low 40K range. If you add in some pension benefit, and/or investment income or annuity, and withdrawls from a 401K type of account this can become part of a pretty nice retirement package.

In this case, and it applies to a lot of folks, the SS tax issue can become significant.
Yes and if you add some mutual funds;

and you can continue to add some other income streams, maybe some stocks, and a restaurant maybe.

However we were discussing SS alone.

In the example that I gave it was a military pension reduced by SS.

But go ahead and tell us what happens once you add onto all of this an additional $100k annual income.

Why stop there?

Add another $500k annual income and then whine about paying income taxes on your tiny SS income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-05-2010, 09:34 PM
 
19,562 posts, read 20,849,080 times
Reputation: 7065
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Pay your taxes and quit gripin
I agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-06-2010, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
13,151 posts, read 13,004,412 times
Reputation: 4598
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
Yes and if you add some mutual funds;

and you can continue to add some other income streams, maybe some stocks, and a restaurant maybe.

However we were discussing SS alone.

In the example that I gave it was a military pension reduced by SS.

But go ahead and tell us what happens once you add onto all of this an additional $100k annual income.

Why stop there?

Add another $500k annual income and then whine about paying income taxes on your tiny SS income.
I think you are missing my main point here. Not sure why you are going off on this tangent.

Social Security can be an "only" income, and when it is the standard tax deduction plus the personal exemption would make it subject to little or no tax. Exempting 20% of all Social Security income from federal tax (as I proposed as an alternative to the current tax situation) would give this a further boost, lessening the probability that it would be taxed. If taxed at all, the tax would be minimal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-06-2010, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,956 posts, read 6,939,633 times
Reputation: 7179
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
I am on pension now. My current pension is low enough that it is not taxed. My income would need to be much higher to begin being taxed.

When I do become old enough to begin getting SS, then my pension will be reduced by the amount of my SS. My total amount received will remain the same.

So even after I begin receiving SS, I will still not be paying income taxes.

SS payments are usually not enough to put you into a high income tax bracket.

Me too! I've not paid income tax for the last 3 years (knock on wood)!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-06-2010, 02:03 PM
 
19,562 posts, read 20,849,080 times
Reputation: 7065
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
I think you are missing my main point here. Not sure why you are going off on this tangent.

Social Security can be an "only" income, and when it is the standard tax deduction plus the personal exemption would make it subject to little or no tax. Exempting 20% of all Social Security income from federal tax (as I proposed as an alternative to the current tax situation) would give this a further boost, lessening the probability that it would be taxed. If taxed at all, the tax would be minimal.
my apology.

Sometimes my PTSD kicks in, not entirely sure why. For some reason I had a rage 'attack' when I was typing that. It makes no sense. It was out of place. Again I apologize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-06-2010, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
13,151 posts, read 13,004,412 times
Reputation: 4598
No problem, it gave me a chance to better explain my position anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-13-2010, 04:33 PM
 
706 posts, read 797,422 times
Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
It should be adjusted. I am amazed at the callousness shown in this country towards those who are at the bottom of the economic scale. It's not always their fault that they've ended up there.
I think people who have an annual income of 1 million or more, and there are plenty of them, should voluntarily ask that the government keep their s.s. benefits. I know they earned them, but they do not need such pocket change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-13-2010, 04:48 PM
 
34,943 posts, read 30,832,892 times
Reputation: 9302
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
SS is not welfare.

SS is a voluntary insurance policy that was paid into by many people.
I pay the 85% rate and find it the best rate of all my income in retirement. Many paying nothing. The day of the free benefit as income is coming to a end to level the playing field really.Everyone wants a special break it seems.SS gets COL adjustments like some other retirement benefit palns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top