Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Rural and Small Town Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2017, 06:17 PM
 
2,245 posts, read 3,008,959 times
Reputation: 4077

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by VM1138 View Post
This shouldn't be a shocker to anyone who's lived or traveled through rural towns. Also not a shocker if you think about it. What's someone with education going to do in a rural area? Not much. So unless you're fantastically wealthy you can't afford to live there.
I wouldn't say "fantastically wealthy". More appropriately, a guaranteed income stream that exist independent of the local economy, that allows one to live a comfortable lifestyle in a low cost-of-living area. In other words, an average retiree. Which is why the average age of these locales is skewing older and older.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2017, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,461 posts, read 61,379,739 times
Reputation: 30409
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLS2753 View Post
I wouldn't say "fantastically wealthy". More appropriately, a guaranteed income stream that exist independent of the local economy, that allows one to live a comfortable lifestyle in a low cost-of-living area. In other words, an average retiree. Which is why the average age of these locales is skewing older and older.
Right, if you can get $1,000 to $1,500 a month from SS or a pension, you can support a family and do okay in a low COL rural area.

I know a lot of fellow retirees who have moved here with their pensions. A guaranteed income of $1200 /month can seem like wealth when everyone else is struggling on 3 p/t seasonal minimum-wage jobs.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 09:18 AM
 
60 posts, read 62,284 times
Reputation: 139
I have to laugh when people talk about small towns being full of poverty.

I live in a town of 109 people in Montana....a bunch of farmers, rich farmers with thousands of acres of land..

Poor?...ya i dont think so, you ever priced out a 150 HP John Deere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 10:49 AM
 
9,868 posts, read 7,697,825 times
Reputation: 22124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobinvans View Post
I have to laugh when people talk about small towns being full of poverty.

I live in a town of 109 people in Montana....a bunch of farmers, rich farmers with thousands of acres of land..

Poor?...ya i dont think so, you ever priced out a 150 HP John Deere?
Good point. What some view as signs of wealth are only show.

Where I live, the stereotype of wealth is a huge log McMansion with prow-like vaulted ceiling with ginormous windows, with lawn and big trees and a pretty splitrail fence around it. Sometimes the yard is only a couple of acres, but it looks very attractive from an urban or suburban standpoint.

In reality, most working ranches (and they aren't poor) have relatively nondescript houses and outbuildings, wire fence, and lots of land with *irrigation water rights.* Plus all the mechanical equipment which, as you pointed out, is expensive but is used for work (i.e., makes money). And livestock.

Land, livestock or crops, and enough water to maintain all of those.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 12:48 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,335,229 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobinvans View Post
I have to laugh when people talk about small towns being full of poverty.

I live in a town of 109 people in Montana....a bunch of farmers, rich farmers with thousands of acres of land..

Poor?...ya i dont think so, you ever priced out a 150 HP John Deere?
You do realize that Census data is what matters, not your personal anecdotes about your neighbors, right?

The Census data indeed confirms that rural areas are the poorest, unhealthiest, least educated, most drug addicted corners of America. They're basically the new inner city.

Rich farmers are like 1% of rural America. They're essentially irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 05:57 PM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,077 posts, read 10,738,506 times
Reputation: 31460
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Rich farmers are like 1% of rural America. They're essentially irrelevant.

And don't forget that, like the 1%, many are sucking off the government teat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 10:42 PM
 
2,305 posts, read 2,408,334 times
Reputation: 1546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
This is an interesting article

Rural America Is the New 'Inner City' -2- | Fox Business

"Today, however, a Wall Street Journal analysis shows that by many key measures of socioeconomic well-being, those charts have flipped. In terms of poverty, college attainment, teenage births, divorce, death rates from heart disease and cancer, reliance on federal disability insurance and male labor-force participation, rural counties now rank the worst among the four major U.S. population groupings (the others are big cities, suburbs and medium or small metro areas).

In fact, the total rural population -- accounting for births, deaths and migration -- has declined for five straight years."

Statistics are statistics, you get what you want to measure.

The issue for the rural areas is that, except for agricultural policy and perhaps the rural electrification program, government policies are set up for urban areas. Need some shiny new trains for a money losing mass transit system, no problem. Need $50 million for a brownfield clean-up, no problem.

On the other hand, need to widen a two-lane road, there is $500,000 study to identify some slug in a field somewhere. With hands in the public's purse, some slug-specialist from Brooklyn will travel every 6 months for the next 5 years to look at the field while complaining how the kale salad just doesn't measure up to the locavore fare like back home. Another $500,000, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,563,461 times
Reputation: 53073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobinvans View Post
I have to laugh when people talk about small towns being full of poverty.

I live in a town of 109 people in Montana....a bunch of farmers, rich farmers with thousands of acres of land..

Poor?...ya i dont think so, you ever priced out a 150 HP John Deere?
Yeah, we have wealthy farm families.

And also trailers full of methheads.

Frankly, far more of the latter than the former.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 11:25 PM
 
60 posts, read 62,284 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
You do realize that Census data is what matters, not your personal anecdotes about your neighbors, right?

The Census data indeed confirms that rural areas are the poorest, unhealthiest, least educated, most drug addicted corners of America. They're basically the new inner city.

Rich farmers are like 1% of rural America. They're essentially irrelevant.
Lived in the country my whole life, no idea what you are talking about to be honest. All i have ever seen around me was farms and ranches. You like to eat right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2017, 11:27 PM
 
60 posts, read 62,284 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by pikabike View Post
Good point. What some view as signs of wealth are only show.

Where I live, the stereotype of wealth is a huge log McMansion with prow-like vaulted ceiling with ginormous windows, with lawn and big trees and a pretty splitrail fence around it. Sometimes the yard is only a couple of acres, but it looks very attractive from an urban or suburban standpoint.

In reality, most working ranches (and they aren't poor) have relatively nondescript houses and outbuildings, wire fence, and lots of land with *irrigation water rights.* Plus all the mechanical equipment which, as you pointed out, is expensive but is used for work (i.e., makes money). And livestock.

Land, livestock or crops, and enough water to maintain all of those.
We have those people in western Montana, the same people that have 4 horses on their 10 acre "Ranch"

haha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Rural and Small Town Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top