Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2017, 07:49 PM
 
490 posts, read 832,065 times
Reputation: 244

Advertisements

Does anyone who kept track remember how far Folsom and Roseville home prices dropped at the lowest point after the bubble burst? Was the drop sharper in Roseville than in Folsom? I know in Elk Grove prices dropped a lot. I would say a house that was selling for around $350K at its historic high point was selling for about $165-175K at its low point during the last real estate bubble burst. But I'm wondering how Roseville did relative to Folsom. Asking because I'm wondering where would home prices will remain the most stable when the next bubble bursts.

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2017, 08:14 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 3,975,491 times
Reputation: 3284
Home values dropped all over the region by 50%

Folsom's recovery was a alot stronger. But Folsom real estate was more prime than Roseville, even 20 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2017, 08:27 PM
 
3 posts, read 3,888 times
Reputation: 10
how are home values now in comparison to pre-bubble values?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2017, 12:56 PM
 
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
3,720 posts, read 9,953,064 times
Reputation: 3927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiel85 View Post
how are home values now in comparison to pre-bubble values?

Home prices in Folsom are still about 5% below the peak:

Peak, 3Q05 - $266/sq ft
Low, 3Q12 - $155/sq ft
Now, 2Q17 - $252/sq ft
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 12:55 AM
 
490 posts, read 832,065 times
Reputation: 244
2 condos in my Folsom area recently sold for $280/sqft and $277/sqft.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 02:57 AM
 
2 posts, read 3,721 times
Reputation: 10
A house that was sold for around $380,000 in 2011 would now sell for around $550,000 in Roseville.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2017, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Rancho Cordova
251 posts, read 372,954 times
Reputation: 172
Here is the median sales price for single family homes for Folsom:
Attached Thumbnails
Home prices right after bubble burst vs now - Folsom & Roseville-screen-shot-2017-07-07-9.36.52  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2017, 08:18 AM
 
2,220 posts, read 2,779,484 times
Reputation: 2711
Prices have bounced back to near the high, and appear to be going upward. "If the Bay Area sneezes, the Sacramento will catch the flu..." as the saying goes, but so far, it's going upward.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2017, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
2,653 posts, read 3,010,343 times
Reputation: 2866
With tighter lending practices and a shortage of labor in the construction industry, I don't see a housing crash happening in the Sacramento region or any other appreciating metro area, especially in the west. But I'm not an economist or one who studies these things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2017, 08:15 PM
 
490 posts, read 832,065 times
Reputation: 244
Thanks everyone.. reason i wanted to know is because it's probably highly unlikely that we'll see another major drop like we saw around 2010/2011. Those deals may have been once in a lifetime, maybe... But having gone through it has somewhat skewed my view of what is a reasonable price to pay for a house now.. I know those low prices back then were an exception, but the prices now I feel are quite high (in Folsom and many other desirable parts of Sac). I don't want to overpay and trying to determine what is a good way to measure if I'm paying a reasonable price or not, when taking the long-term view considering typical up/down cycles and situations like we saw in 2010/2011.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top