Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-07-2010, 07:27 AM
 
10 posts, read 34,623 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

Hi,

I think this is extremely important for REO buyers
to know about this.

I bought two REOs in 2008/2009 and worked through
the well-known problem of understanding the
legal and physical state of the property given
the bank is an absent owner.

However, in a recent transaction, another
***new type of problem*** arose, that my
friends (also buyers) have run into and
my broker says is becoming common.
Here is the typical situation.

We were the only buyers, offer was above
asking price (we were in a hurry). Inspector
found a problem, so we called in a specialist
who said there was a simple fix. This added
a two day delay to the entire process (but we could
still close on time) so we asked for a two day
extension.

The bank then throws everyone for a curve ball
and says they no longer want to sell us the house
and we are taking too long. Whoa! Drops us like
a cold fish, two weeks later the property is still on
the market, no buyers.

This is VERY serious problem with buying REOs
since you typically have to invest 40-80 hours researching
them and then to have a bank drop you is a huge waste
of time.

Personally, I'm going back to the stock market.
Vanguard never turned down one of my checks!

Note, the good faith deposit was returned, no problems
there. It's though they were unhappy we were doing due
dilligence and researching the property. This is something
you need to do when buying an REO hence the big problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top