U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 02:13 PM
 
258 posts, read 80,871 times
Reputation: 120
Hopefully the city will look into other water sources for future growth. Given the past and current trends SA will continue to grow and the demands on our water will so too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 07-10-2012, 02:39 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
810 posts, read 307,144 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steel Man View Post
It really doesn't matter how much water is in the Edward's Aquifer. All that matters is that as the water level continues to go down more restrictions will be enforced. The next step would be to raise water prices. Also, don't forget about endangered species that are protected by federal law and that would also have an impact on our water supply.
The water level has been hurt by this crazy drought and the fact that we are still in it going into year two. The restrictions in place now are triggered at ten feet lower and now its harder to get out of. (having to be above the threshold for 30 days) San Antonio is growing and will continue as the rest of Texas also grows. The city really has nothing in its way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 02:42 PM
 
3,231 posts, read 3,885,436 times
Reputation: 1103
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffutsa2001 View Post
Hopefully the city will look into other water sources for future growth. Given the past and current trends SA will continue to grow and the demands on our water will so too.
Where? And why? Should we be like Los Angeles and take it from a river up north Owens Lake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If we continue to grow, we must do it smartly, using water resources wisely. Make the presumption that we rely only on what we have, and figure out how to use it best. That means reconsidering new subdivisions with large lawns, that means reconsidering building over the aquifer. That means re-focusing on already existing developments, maximizing their potential and minimizing water use. That means learning about - at the city leadership level - rainwater harvesting and making this not only feasible, but the norm for all residents and required of any new construction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 03:28 PM
 
258 posts, read 80,871 times
Reputation: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Where? And why? Should we be like Los Angeles and take it from a river up north Owens Lake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If we continue to grow, we must do it smartly, using water resources wisely. Make the presumption that we rely only on what we have, and figure out how to use it best. That means reconsidering new subdivisions with large lawns, that means reconsidering building over the aquifer. That means re-focusing on already existing developments, maximizing their potential and minimizing water use. That means learning about - at the city leadership level - rainwater harvesting and making this not only feasible, but the norm for all residents and required of any new construction.
I am all about smart growth...Let's learn to recycle more. Capture rain water (as it is raining outside at this very moment). I agree our city leadership needs to be proactive today if not we should vote for those that will protect our environment. Let's hope!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 03:37 PM
 
376 posts, read 233,747 times
Reputation: 383
People worrying about water resources are just buying into the alarmist bs the EA authority puts out. The EA is hundreds Of times larger than people think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 03:42 PM
 
258 posts, read 80,871 times
Reputation: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by teenwolf80 View Post
People worrying about water resources are just buying into the alarmist bs the EA authority puts out. The EA is hundreds Of times larger than people think.
I am thinking the same. No one really know how much water is really in there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 03:57 PM
 
3,231 posts, read 3,885,436 times
Reputation: 1103
Quote:
Originally Posted by teenwolf80 View Post
People worrying about water resources are just buying into the alarmist bs the EA authority puts out. The EA is hundreds Of times larger than people think.
People concerned about water resources are intelligent scientists who have studied water resources and who have been in other places where water resources are scarce. They are people who have seen the outcome of ignoring water waste.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 04:26 PM
 
376 posts, read 233,747 times
Reputation: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
People concerned about water resources are intelligent scientists who have studied water resources and who have been in other places where water resources are scarce. They are people who have seen the outcome of ignoring water waste.
So scientists are infallible? Science can never be wrong?

The fact of the matter is the EA only accounts for a fraction of the water that's really there.

It's never going to stop raining in our region in our life times or the 20 lifetimes baring some catastrophic event like a giant meteor or nuclear war.

The restricts SAWS puts in place when the EA hits certain "level" is unessecary.

The EA isn't 644 feet. It's thousands of feet deep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 04:42 PM
 
2,939 posts, read 4,521,006 times
Reputation: 1069
I thought SA metro area was 2.3 million
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-10-2012, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
26 posts, read 16,342 times
Reputation: 17
Whenever I hear about the a comparison of the size of San Antonio to other cities that have large outlying suburbs as well I think of a little boy flexing his arm muscles saying "look - I am as big as Dad"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top