|

05-02-2008, 03:37 PM
|
|
One .JPG is worth a thousand .TXTs
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio
747 posts, read 443,598 times
Reputation: 310
|
|
Quote:
|
We are the 29th largest metro
|
Actually, not to split hairs, but we're 28th now. We'll likely be 26th by the time the next Census rolls around.
I agree that media DMA is not a fair measure. In SA's case especially, we lose a large chunk of what would normally be our DMA because of the close proximity of Austin. If you look at a national population density map, SA sits at the very SW corner of the area of general higher density, so the area we're left with for our DMA just happens to be the more sparsely populated hinterland.
|
|

05-02-2008, 03:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
163 posts, read 127,429 times
Reputation: 59
|
|
|
Trnmeon made some good points...don't let the "SA ra-rah" clique on here get to you.
Dvlpr, you hit the nail on the head! I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said.
I'd just like to say that it's strange to me how so many people get so bent out of shape on this board when anyone says anything negative about San Antonio - like it's a sports team or something. That is a foolish attitude to have.
|
|

05-02-2008, 03:48 PM
|
|
One .JPG is worth a thousand .TXTs
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio
747 posts, read 443,598 times
Reputation: 310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trnmeon
San Antonio,...lacks the infrastructure and economical significance of other top 10 US cities.
|
Hardly. Just off the top of my head:
- We're in the top 10 for Fortune 500 HQs.
- Rand McNally's business and marketing atlas ranks us as a "national business center" (I believe their designation is "1-A").
- We're a "standalone" city in national AP news reports (meaning it's just "San Antonio", not "San Antonio, Texas").
Last edited by TexHwyMan; 05-02-2008 at 03:56 PM..
Reason: Spelling error
|
|

05-02-2008, 03:54 PM
|
|
One .JPG is worth a thousand .TXTs
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio
747 posts, read 443,598 times
Reputation: 310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trnmeon
The city itself may have 1.2 million people, but the metropolitan area only has marginally more.
|
The city has a population of about 1.3 million, the metro area about 2 million. That means the metro area has 53% more people than the city, which certainly isn't "marginally more".
|
|

05-02-2008, 03:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
259 posts, read 156,929 times
Reputation: 99
|
|
|
I am on the fence, so I'll just list what I like and don't like.
What I like:
-The old buildings downtown
-the northside part of town
-the choices of universities
What I don't like:
-old buildings always getting destroyed for "progress"
-Every neighborhood in the damn city has a gang/crime problem, and it's completely taken over many nice neighborhoods like the one I used to live in as a kid.
-half the major concert tours have a habit of skipping San Antonio. I am still a little bitter that SA is the only major US city GnR never played in.
|
|

05-02-2008, 04:00 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
6,340 posts, read 3,818,199 times
Reputation: 2304
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexHwyMan
I agree that media DMA is not a fair measure. In SA's case especially, we lose a large chunk of what would normally be our DMA because of the close proximity of Austin. If you look at a national population density map, SA sits at the very SW corner of the area of general higher density, so the area we're left with for our DMA just happens to be the more sparsely populated hinterland.
|
I agree that ranking by SMSA would be fairer, but since the last census used for SMSA ranking was taken 8 years ago, I didn't think it would reflect recent growth. I picked DMA because it was the most readily available alternative that I am familiar with.
Could someone post a ranked list of San Antonio's peer SMSAs using a post-2000 adjusted estimate for population?
|
|

05-02-2008, 04:07 PM
|
|
One .JPG is worth a thousand .TXTs
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio
747 posts, read 443,598 times
Reputation: 310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowie
I agree that ranking by SMSA would be fairer, but since the last census used for SMSA ranking was taken 8 years ago, I didn't think it would reflect recent growth. I picked DMA because it was the most readily available alternative that I am familiar with.
Could someone post a ranked list of San Antonio's peer SMSAs using a post-2000 adjusted estimate for population?
|
22. Pittsburgh, PA....2,355,712
23. Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA....2,175,113
24. Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN....2,133,678
25. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH....2,096,471
26. Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA....2,091,120
27. Orlando-Kissimmee, FL....2,032,496
28. San Antonio, TX....1,990,675
29. Kansas City, MO-KS....1,985,429
30. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV....1,836,333
31. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA....1,803,643
32. Columbus, OH....1,754,337
33. Indianapolis-Carmel, IN....1,695,037
(Source: Annual Estimates of the Population of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas)
|
|

05-02-2008, 04:15 PM
|
|
Conservative Thinker
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio North
4,117 posts, read 2,025,118 times
Reputation: 924
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexHwyMan
22. Pittsburgh, PA....2,355,712
23. Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA....2,175,113
24. Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN....2,133,678
25. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH....2,096,471
26. Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA....2,091,120
27. Orlando-Kissimmee, FL....2,032,496
28. San Antonio, TX....1,990,675
29. Kansas City, MO-KS....1,985,429
30. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV....1,836,333
31. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA....1,803,643
32. Columbus, OH....1,754,337
33. Indianapolis-Carmel, IN....1,695,037
(Source: Annual Estimates of the Population of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas)
|
Of all these numbers it is amazing how California and Florida have hit a population growth wall.
|
|

05-02-2008, 04:22 PM
|
|
MO Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
2,782 posts, read 1,809,725 times
Reputation: 4357
|
|
I'm not really sure what all the numbers and rankings etc have to do with the concerns of the OP
Please understand folks that both the positive and negative facts, thoughts and opinions of the city and surrounding communities are welcome here in the forum...all we ask is that everyone keeps it civil and we stay close to the original topic. Thanks folks.
|
|

05-02-2008, 04:30 PM
|
|
Zen Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Timberon, NM (In the Sacramento Mountains)
5,497 posts, read 3,292,962 times
Reputation: 2244
|
|
|
I lived in San Antonio for 3 years before moving to the small town in Fredericksburg which is a little over an hour away. I was in fredericksburg for 3 years and got used to the small town living. I'm saying this in regards as to what you said about crime and looking over your shoulder all the time. In any big city, there is more crime. I'm back here in S.A. now temporarily and it is a lot different than calm quiet Fredericksburg (where you don't have to be paronoid all the time) but it's a great city.
I live in the north central part of town which seems to be safe. I know of some other areas that are safe as well but there will still be crime and you should always look over your shoulder.
If anything, you may have a problem getting used to the heat and humidity but I can think of more positives than negatives about San Antonio.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|