|

08-18-2009, 06:18 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
1,128 posts, read 1,137,787 times
Reputation: 211
|
|
Hemisfair Park redevelopment
They call it underutilized. That's putting it mildly.
I would go so far as to call the Hemisfair Park "un-utilized." I'm glad there is some plan for it. It needs change badly.
HemisFair rebirth focus of nonprofit
|
|

08-18-2009, 09:28 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
1,973 posts, read 1,277,570 times
Reputation: 355
|
|
|
I think I'm ok with the new plans (wasn't so much at first), but I don't get why people who never venture there think it's underutilized just because they don't use it. Whenever we go during the day - which is often, the playground is packed and tons of people are wandering around. And the weekly movies by moonlight have been drawing crowds of 700+ (1200 on the night John Hughes died, which just happened to be the same night they planned to screen Pretty in Pink). Though free, the concessions are doing a good business on those nights.
|
|

08-18-2009, 08:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
1,128 posts, read 1,137,787 times
Reputation: 211
|
|
|
I think it could use more attractions. The first time I went there as a kid they had an indoor food court. They also had a playground with very interesting/different stuff.
|
|

08-18-2009, 09:36 PM
|
|
Becoming addicted to Twitter...
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 78253
641 posts, read 406,712 times
Reputation: 270
|
|
|
I work at the Institute for Texan Cultures (adjacent to Hemisfair Park) and can vouch for Chaka's statement re: kid's playground. It's normally busy over there, but there is a lot to be desired as far as the rest of the grounds are concerned. It's more of a "pass-through" area during the day, meaning that walkers are merely getting from one destination (e.g. the Tower of the Americas) to another (e.g. the Riverwalk). I, for one, would support a revitalization effort as long as some effort was made to retain some of the original "charm."
--Dim
|
|

08-18-2009, 09:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
1,973 posts, read 1,277,570 times
Reputation: 355
|
|
|
I should clarify that I'm normally there on the evenings/weekends, so that may bias my perspective. Still, it is used. I wasn't happy to hear our park would go away, but after looking more at the plans, I think in general what is envisioned should be promising. I just don't want to lose a nice park. I like that it's a little oasis. I love walking through the river area under the convention center.
|
|

08-18-2009, 09:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
1,012 posts, read 475,445 times
Reputation: 398
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka
I think I'm ok with the new plans (wasn't so much at first), but I don't get why people who never venture there think it's underutilized just because they don't use it. Whenever we go during the day - which is often, the playground is packed and tons of people are wandering around. And the weekly movies by moonlight have been drawing crowds of 700+ (1200 on the night John Hughes died, which just happened to be the same night they planned to screen Pretty in Pink). Though free, the concessions are doing a good business on those nights.
|
If done right all that can be maintained because there's going to be a park element to the new development, a "Central Park" (no, not the NYC park) which will probably be a better "park" than what is there now.
Once they tear down the ITC, Courthouse, etc and move the historic homes it opens a ton of land for redevelopment for residential use for work use for retail use plus enough land for a park where a playground can go, where a amphitheater or something can go for the movies and small concerts.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|