Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Diego
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-13-2018, 06:41 PM
 
1,798 posts, read 1,124,212 times
Reputation: 2479

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axxlrod View Post
Boomers are "hoarding" their wealth because they made it. It's theirs; not yours. You just want them to give it to you because you'd rather complain than go work for it.

Let me guess... you want them to spread it around a little bit?
Wealth that has conveniently accumulated by not paying their fair share of property taxes and getting subsidies on mortgages.

Last time I checked, that's a huge subsidy from recent homebuyers and renters when it comes to taxes

I don't want a redistribution of their wealth. Boomers need to keep their money as they age because they'll have fixed incomes.

What I want is for them to stop making it their personal mission to limit new housing in their neighborhoods. I also want them to pay their fair share in property taxes.

We also need to end the mortgage interest deduction for all people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2018, 07:02 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,288 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34073
Look at all this new home construction in San Diego.

Who's got a spare 700 - 950 grand laying around?


https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/unit...iego-new-homes



Or 4 million? https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/pacific-gate

Just how much in property taxes are people paying for a 4 million dollar condo? How many people under 30 can afford a 4 million dollar condo? Who's paying the lion share of property taxes? My neighbor, now 90s, said he bought his place in 1957 for 20 grand and he was making squat in the Navy. Take a look at this chart.

https://www.navycs.com/charts/1955-m...pay-chart.html

Meanwhile in the lone star state https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...Tyler_TX/sby-1

Last edited by 1AngryTaxPayer; 06-14-2018 at 07:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 10:25 AM
 
Location: La Mesa Aka The Table
9,824 posts, read 11,548,625 times
Reputation: 11900
Quote:
Originally Posted by newgensandiego View Post
Wealth that has conveniently accumulated by not paying their fair share of property taxes and getting subsidies on mortgages.

Last time I checked, that's a huge subsidy from recent homebuyers and renters when it comes to taxes

I don't want a redistribution of their wealth. Boomers need to keep their money as they age because they'll have fixed incomes.

What I want is for them to stop making it their personal mission to limit new housing in their neighborhoods. I also want them to pay their fair share in property taxes.

We also need to end the mortgage interest deduction for all people.
You're on to something kid, but sadly just mentioning getting rid of Prop 13 to Boomers might get you Buried in the Desert in a unmarked grave


Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Look at all this new home construction in San Diego.

Who's got a spare 700 - 950 grand laying around?


https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/unit...iego-new-homes



Or 4 million? https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/pacific-gate

Just how much in property taxes are people paying for a 4 million dollar condo? How many people under 30 can afford a 4 million dollar condo? Who's paying the lion share of property taxes? My neighbor,now 90s, said he bought his place in 1957 for 20 grand and he was making squat in the Navy. Take a look at this chart.

https://www.navycs.com/charts/1955-m...pay-chart.html

Meanwhile in the lone star state https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...Tyler_TX/sby-1
The poor guy still had it made in the shade if he was an E5 and with 8 years in
20k Mortgage at 4.75% was $104 a month
Anything under that and he wouldn't of Qualified





Quote:
What was the average salary in 1950?

In 1950 a new house cost $8,450.00 and by 1959 was $12,400.00 More House Prices.
In 1950 the average income per year was $3,210.00 and by 1959 was $5,010.00.
In 1950 a gallon of gas was 18 cents and by 1959 was 25 cents.
In 1950 the average cost of new car was $1,510.00 and by 1959 was $2,200.00.
Mortgage rates were 4.75 % in the 50's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 01:26 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,288 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34073
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman619 View Post
You're on to something kid, but sadly just mentioning getting rid of Prop 13 to Boomers might get you Buried in the Desert in a unmarked grave


The poor guy still had it made in the shade if he was an E5 and with 8 years in
20k Mortgage at 4.75% was $104 a month
Anything under that and he wouldn't of Qualified
My original mortgage in 1998 was a little over 800 bucks!! If I had known what was going to happen I would have bought 5 of em

Alas, can't turn back that clock. I was pricing a box of nails at HD and it was 8 BUCKS for lil tiny box.

Last edited by 1AngryTaxPayer; 06-14-2018 at 01:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 03:20 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,741 posts, read 4,699,967 times
Reputation: 12819
Quote:
Originally Posted by newgensandiego View Post
Wealth that has conveniently accumulated by not paying their fair share of property taxes and getting subsidies on mortgages.

Last time I checked, that's a huge subsidy from recent homebuyers and renters when it comes to taxes

I don't want a redistribution of their wealth. Boomers need to keep their money as they age because they'll have fixed incomes.

What I want is for them to stop making it their personal mission to limit new housing in their neighborhoods. I also want them to pay their fair share in property taxes.

We also need to end the mortgage interest deduction for all people.
You're young and you have a chip on your shoulder. I get it. You'll change your tune once you get a seat at the table.

You're painting with a very broad brush here. I'm no boomer, but to say I'm not paying my fair share of property taxes is laughable. $18K per year for my house in prop taxes. You think I use that much $$$ in city/county services? I'd say I'm paying way more than my fair share, but I'm not complaining. I'll pay whatever the govt says I have to. Just like all those boomers who you saying aren't paying their fair share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 04:04 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
3,416 posts, read 2,457,910 times
Reputation: 6166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axxlrod View Post
You're young and you have a chip on your shoulder. I get it. You'll change your tune once you get a seat at the table.

You're painting with a very broad brush here. I'm no boomer, but to say I'm not paying my fair share of property taxes is laughable. $18K per year for my house in prop taxes. You think I use that much $$$ in city/county services? I'd say I'm paying way more than my fair share, but I'm not complaining. I'll pay whatever the govt says I have to. Just like all those boomers who you saying aren't paying their fair share.
Exactly. Some people just assume everyone has been in their house for decades paying nothing in taxes. If they were to do any real research on this subject, and not just anecdotal click bait articles, they’d learn that the high turnover rate, coupled with high property values, gives the state plenty of property tax revenue. This has been proven countless times over with real numbers.

If they think a change in prop 13 is gonna lower their income tax, or sales tax, they’re not only ignorant, they’re delusional. If they’re hoping it’s gonna put houses on the market, with lower prices, there’s some truth to that, but they’ll be even more costly than they are now with the increase in property tax. Go talk to my in-laws in NY about property tax, and affordability.

Furthermore if they had any clue to how a amortization schedule works for a mortgage they’d realize the interest write off is nill when their property tax bill might be disproportionate to others 20 years later. To say people are building their wealth off low property tax bills, and interest write offs, is comical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 04:05 PM
 
381 posts, read 344,681 times
Reputation: 780
I think there is a middle ground here folks. Nobody wants to drag grandma out of her house because she isn't paying enough taxes (at least we hope not). On the other hand, it could be argued that some very bad policies have been implemented in California (this is a no brainer, right?).

I would argue that the lax property tax policy has added fuel to the fire of high home prices. This, coupled with policies that stifle development and drive up the cost of new housing are large contributing factors toward younger generations not being able to purchase homes. We can argue that boomers are greedy, or millennials are lazy, but the policies are really the factors here. People are simply taking advantage of their circumstances, for better or worse.

Personally I have left the state to start a better life elsewhere. I was raised in California, graduated college, make a mid six figure salary, and yet cannot afford to comfortably raise a family in this city. I can see how it is frustrating for people that can't afford a house when they earn several times as much as some current homeowners, many of which are pushing back against building more housing. I can see both sides and unfortunately everyone is acting in their own self interest, but that is capatalism and why we are not all living in boxes (yet) like socialists. I said screw it, I'm not going to pay someone for their overpriced house. I'll start over elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 04:11 PM
 
Location: La Mesa Aka The Table
9,824 posts, read 11,548,625 times
Reputation: 11900
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman1 View Post
I think there is a middle ground here folks. Nobody wants to drag grandma out of her house because she isn't paying enough taxes (at least we hope not). On the other hand, it could be argued that some very bad policies have been implemented in California (this is a no brainer, right?).

I would argue that the lax property tax policy has added fuel to the fire of high home prices. This, coupled with policies that stifle development and drive up the cost of new housing are large contributing factors toward younger generations not being able to purchase homes. We can argue that boomers are greedy, or millennials are lazy, but the policies are really the factors here. People are simply taking advantage of their circumstances, for better or worse.


Personally I have left the state to start a better life elsewhere. I was raised in California, graduated college, make a mid six figure salary, and yet cannot afford to comfortably raise a family in this city. I can see how it is frustrating for people that can't afford a house when they earn several times as much as some current homeowners, many of which are pushing back against building more housing. I can see both sides and unfortunately everyone is acting in their own self interest, but that is capatalism and why we are not all living in boxes (yet) like socialists. I said screw it, I'm not going to pay someone for their overpriced house. I'll start over elsewhere.
I'm with this man
Blaming one Generation for another is dumb and Divisive. These Liberal Policies in place are the blame here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 04:28 PM
 
381 posts, read 344,681 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman619 View Post
I'm with this man
Blaming one Generation for another is dumb and Divisive. These Liberal Policies in place are the blame here.
Thanks.

I must say that newgensandiego made some very fair points, as did others. Perhaps I'm wrong about this though, but newgensandiego seems to have a bit of a liberal bent hinting at blaming Trump or others. I understand being upset about the state of housing as I was largely in the same boat.

At the risk of sounding condescending though, this really is a teachable moment for everyone, liberals in particular. If you look at this issue of housing, it is the government's fault (and often times liberals that voted for the gov't) that we are in this state. The government controls taxation, the government controls where and what you can build, the arduous permitting process, and the government now controls who can and cannot live in the houses ("affordable" housing). If that wasn't enough the gov't also charges you $1/gallon more here for gas due to taxes, compounding the affordability problem.

People that do not own homes should be asking for less government interference, not more. The government isn't going to build you a house, but they will muck everything up by stifling development and taking houses off the market to give to those few they deem fit.

I'm hopeful that people will learn from this and realize that government is the problem, not the solution.

Last edited by spoonman1; 06-14-2018 at 04:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 07:10 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,288 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34073
Speaking of the government blunders. They want to plop down "affordable housing" , is this the new pc term for HUD or section 8, in Point Loma where the average house runs for close to a million. I mean, section 8 on the coastline? Really?

They pulled a bait and switch in a new gated community in Del Mar where the homes were all 1 -3 million. What they didn't tell anyone was the last phase of the build was section 8/low income. People were p*ssed. Sure enough within a month after these rentals were rented out crime and graffiti INSIDE the gated community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Diego

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top