Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Diego
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-16-2007, 04:27 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
11 posts, read 58,922 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

I read from this website artice dated December 2003 that one of San Diego's civic leaders, the governor of Baja california, and the president of the IOC said that they were all "very much interested" in the idea of San Diego and Tijuana both sharing the hosting rights to the 2016 Summer Olympics.

http://www.sandiegometro.com/2003/dec/coverstory2.html (broken link)

Yeah, it's an old article and the chances of it acutally happening are slim, but If by chance that San Diego and Tijuana decide to submit a joint bid, and in the off chance that they are selected, what would you think of it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2007, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Tijuana Exurbs
4,537 posts, read 12,397,477 times
Reputation: 6280
While a San Diego - Tijuana Olympic games would be pretty neat...

Pros:

A fair amount of the athletic infrastructure is already in place. Not all by any means, but some.

There is a good supply of dormitory housing available at local colleges

There is a good supply of hotel space for visitors.

The weather is ideal.

The Time Zone for the US and European media markets would allow for more live broadcasts in prime time in those markets with the most advertising dollars.

Cons:

Which city would get top billing? And would the other city be ok with that?

The housing for athletes would be spread out among the various colleges. There would be no athletic village.

Crossing the border by visitors would be a major hassle.

A joint bid would create divided and chaotic management.

And San Diego doesn't have the money. Not now, and not for decades.


A joint bid would cause too many rivalries and jeaolousies between the cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2007, 11:01 PM
 
Location: Paradise/Las Vegas
1,658 posts, read 7,573,112 times
Reputation: 422
All i know is that we don't need any more tourist
find somewhere else to have your olympics
sorry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Diego
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top