U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Thread summary:

Visiting San Francisco: traffic, cost of living, buy a house, mortgage, real estate.

Reply
 
Unread 09-20-2007, 11:23 AM
 
24,098 posts, read 11,981,669 times
Reputation: 11759
Default Just Visiting

I just got back from my first visit to San Francisco and parts north of there.

I came away mostly impressed and a little horrified.

It's a beautiful city, tons of pretty much EVERYTHING, great climate....

However, traffic and the cost of living (homes etc) were horrible. It is stunning to consider that you could make 100k a year and pretty much be out of reach of ever owning a home.

The idea of 1.5 hour (or more) commutes to a 350k crap hole is just a little numbing.

Anyway, a great place to visit I was fortunate in that the people I was visiting have a large place in a VERY nice part of SF and a small ranch\vineyard in the Sonoma Hills so if I could live like that *HA HA HA* then it would be great. However, reality for my moving to SF and I make a good wage....would be a major blow in terms of quality of life.

Oh well, looking forward to visiting again sometime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 09-20-2007, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
1,554 posts, read 2,920,166 times
Reputation: 612
Like NYC most people in SF rent. Owning is almost impossible unless you're a millionaire. You can find some decent places outside of SF in surrounding cities. Mainly the East bay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-20-2007, 03:28 PM
 
358 posts, read 1,171,817 times
Reputation: 158
You might be confusing "home" with "house".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-20-2007, 10:04 PM
 
24,098 posts, read 11,981,669 times
Reputation: 11759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milliano View Post
You might be confusing "home" with "house".
Thanks. I find it really interesting why you chose this post out of so many with errors in them to try to put me down. I must have written something that bugged you so you decided to take a pot shot at me.

By the way, home\house is a regional thing. For example, "You should get out of the house more."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-21-2007, 11:56 AM
 
358 posts, read 1,171,817 times
Reputation: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Thanks. I find it really interesting why you chose this post out of so many with errors in them to try to put me down. I must have written something that bugged you so you decided to take a pot shot at me.

By the way, home\house is a regional thing. For example, "You should get out of the house more."
I wasn't insulting you. I was commenting on what I felt was a very incorrect and biased viewpoint about buying a home in SF. The same old nonsense that only the rich can afford a home there

Quote:
Originally Posted by City Boy View Post
Owning is almost impossible unless you're a millionaire.
I wonder how over one third of SF households do it then. To my surprise, median household income in SF is around $50,000 ... rather than say $700,000 ...

Last edited by Milliano; 09-21-2007 at 12:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-21-2007, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
1,554 posts, read 2,920,166 times
Reputation: 612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milliano View Post
I wasn't insulting you. I was commenting on what I felt was a very incorrect and biased viewpoint about buying a home in SF. The same old nonsense that only the rich can afford a home there



I wonder how over one third of SF households do it then. To my surprise, median household income in SF is around $50,000 ... rather than say $700,000 ...
You can't be serious. There is Nothing incorrect about what I said. In case you haven't noticed It's not 1950 anymore. The people who own, bought the houses when you actually afford to buy them. You think you can move into SF and buy a average size home for less than 700k? Get real. Why don't you look around online and see what you can buy in SF for less than 700k that isn't falling apart. There is a reason why SF and NYC are the most unfordable places in the US. BECAUSE THEY ARE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-21-2007, 01:09 PM
 
24,098 posts, read 11,981,669 times
Reputation: 11759
I think he's talking about renting or some-such....but I said "own" so using your home definition to include condo's etc. as well as houses....I don't see it on 50k.

Maybe you are talking about buying a truck or van where you can park it on the street and sleep at night in the back. (Which I saw plenty of) It's not a house but it's a home.

P.S. Snotty comments followed by the eyes-rolling thing is insulting.... Moderator cut: Personal insult

Last edited by gizmo980; 09-21-2007 at 09:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-21-2007, 04:53 PM
 
374 posts, read 1,040,883 times
Reputation: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Boy View Post
You can't be serious. There is Nothing incorrect about what I said. In case you haven't noticed It's not 1950 anymore. The people who own, bought the houses when you actually afford to buy them. You think you can move into SF and buy a average size home for less than 700k? Get real. Why don't you look around online and see what you can buy in SF for less than 700k that isn't falling apart. There is a reason why SF and NYC are the most unfordable places in the US. BECAUSE THEY ARE
Yes, you are incorrect. I know several friends here who make $130-$150k/year who own homes. One makes $130k and owns a nice home in the Castro. He went in on it with friends who are a couple, who, together, make just over $100k. The three of them bought a house for $1.2MM, now valued at 1.3MM a couple years ago. My single friend lives in the top unit, the couple live in the middle unit, and the ground floor is a garage, studio (where I live) and nice big deck.

So yes, by saying you cannot own here unless you are a millionaire is indeed INCORRECT! Granted it's not going to be a two story, four bedroom house, with a large lawn (the average home), but most people live in SF because they like the urban/city life.

I, for one, would rather rent here for the rest of my life than own any where else. That's my preference. All my friends in the Twin Cities (Minneapolis/St. Paul) are homeowners now...and most of their mortgages are less than what I pay in rent for a studio. But, I am in San Francisco and they are in the Twin Cities. You get what you pay for, and living here IMO is more than worth the cost....to me....and that's what's important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-21-2007, 08:45 PM
 
24,098 posts, read 11,981,669 times
Reputation: 11759
Quote:
Originally Posted by beone View Post
Yes, you are incorrect. I know several friends here who make $130-$150k/year who own homes. One makes $130k and owns a nice home in the Castro. He went in on it with friends who are a couple, who, together, make just over $100k. The three of them bought a house for $1.2MM, now valued at 1.3MM a couple years ago. My single friend lives in the top unit, the couple live in the middle unit, and the ground floor is a garage, studio (where I live) and nice big deck.

So yes, by saying you cannot own here unless you are a millionaire is indeed INCORRECT! Granted it's not going to be a two story, four bedroom house, with a large lawn (the average home), but most people live in SF because they like the urban/city life.

I, for one, would rather rent here for the rest of my life than own any where else. That's my preference. All my friends in the Twin Cities (Minneapolis/St. Paul) are homeowners now...and most of their mortgages are less than what I pay in rent for a studio. But, I am in San Francisco and they are in the Twin Cities. You get what you pay for, and living here IMO is more than worth the cost....to me....and that's what's important.
First off, I agree it's a really nice place....I'm merely pointing out one of it's few downsides and every place has them.

Assuming you and the guy making 130k cover 1/2 the mortgage....the couple making 100k combined have a 600k mortgage to cover which would be a monthly payment of around 5k.

This is where my bullcrap meter goes off.....the couple making 100k would have a hard time making the payments on even a 400k mortgage without really just scraping by. So, they must have had some serious downpayment or money from another source like prior home, inheritance etc.

They also aren't making 50k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-21-2007, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
21,767 posts, read 20,960,109 times
Reputation: 8710
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Boy View Post
You can't be serious. There is Nothing incorrect about what I said. In case you haven't noticed It's not 1950 anymore. The people who own, bought the houses when you actually afford to buy them. You think you can move into SF and buy a average size home for less than 700k? Get real. Why don't you look around online and see what you can buy in SF for less than 700k that isn't falling apart. There is a reason why SF and NYC are the most unfordable places in the US. BECAUSE THEY ARE
I wasn't even alive in the 1950s, and many of my friends & peers own homes, purchased in the last 5 years - and they're FAR from millionaires! These homes/condos ranged in price from $299K - $1M, and they all afforded them without a million-dollar salary. I don't know much about real estate, but it can be done... and as Milliano said, you can't dispute how many residents here own homes (and aren't making huge salaries).

Last edited by gizmo980; 09-21-2007 at 09:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top