Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2014, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
578 posts, read 1,294,950 times
Reputation: 348

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
No, but they need to spread the wealth. There are many parts of the state that need jobs, and can accommodate growth. Bay Area freeways are already too congested, and rents are going so sky-high, long-term locals are getting pushed out. Growth can be more rationally planned.
... like creating jobs in areas that really need the jobs, aka Central Valley.

Thinking about the possibility of that many new hires by Google alone makes me queasy. Traffic's already gotten worse within the past two months, not sure how much more traffic we can really handle. Boo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2014, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,876,599 times
Reputation: 28563
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
Ruth4Truth, don't their shuttles go to Oakland and Berzerkly? Rents will probably go up. But, I guess if you spread 30,000 techies out all over the Bay Area, their total impact won't be so bad?
There are shuttles to Oakland and Berkeley, and rents have gone up on those routes too. But it really encourages burn out. 3 hours a day commuting. Even via a cushy shuttle is a giant time suck. Google should spread the offices around it combine it with housing development within 1 mile to lessen the traffic impact. And build within in 1/2 of frequent transit and rail stations.

More workers in farflung office parks is not what we need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21244
^Maybe Google is one of the parties interested in the Sears store?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 10:39 AM
 
Location: America's Expensive Toilet
1,516 posts, read 1,248,669 times
Reputation: 3195
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
^Maybe Google is one of the parties interested in the Sears store?
It sounds like they will be expanding into their purchased south bay properties, but I wouldn't rule that out.

"Their young engineers like to live in San Francisco. So this provides an option so they don't have to drive all the way to Mountain View. It will help Google recruit new talent."

Who's driving to work? If those Google buses didn't exist, just how many of their employees in SF/East Bay would be willing to do that commute day in and day out? They also kind of brought that problem on themselves. By giving the employees buses, they've given an incentive to live in the city. Now they want to open a Redwood City office so the commute isn't as bad. Well, if you didn't offer the dumb bus to begin with, I'm sure less of your employees would be living so far away if they wanted to work for you. Also, don't they have an SF office? Is it only reserved for a certain team or something?

What's really sad is that Google and tech startups think they must be in this area. Yeah, I get that it's the heart of the tech industry, but a Google office in say, Portland, would do a lot of good for that city. Or even expanding their current satellite offices would be a better option. I don't really want to think about how much more ridiculous the rents will get and how congested the streets will be if they are really going to bring in 20-30K more employees into this area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,505,733 times
Reputation: 38576
This kind of reminds me of how Boeing impacts the Seattle area. They hire thousands, and later lay off thousands. Repeat.

A fluctuation of thousands of employees coming and going in an area with massive hires and layoffs is really hard on the local economy.

I get nervous when companies expand like mad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21244
Google is not responsible for the job market in other areas.

And start ups flock here from all over the world because the Bay Area recieves around half the nation's venture capital, which is the money that finances their growth.

So yes, you can start a company anywhere, but nowhere even comes to close to the Bay as far as incubating new tech start ups into internationally known brands.

The proof is in our daily lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
578 posts, read 1,294,950 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by likealady View Post
Who's driving to work? If those Google buses didn't exist, just how many of their employees in SF/East Bay would be willing to do that commute day in and day out?
On the Google site, it says this:

Googlers often leave their cars at home (or don't own cars at all). About 6,400 Googlers take the shuttle to work on any given day, and our shuttle program hit 2.5 million rides in 2013.

So that's only a drop in the bucket... they're still bringing a lot more cars with new employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 11:48 AM
 
Location: New York NY
5,521 posts, read 8,771,334 times
Reputation: 12738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
No, but they need to spread the wealth. There are many parts of the state that need jobs, and can accommodate growth. Bay Area freeways are already too congested, and rents are going so sky-high, long-term locals are getting pushed out. Growth can be more rationally planned.
This will not happen and IMO should not happen. People in the same profession need to be physically near other folks in that profession for networking, bouncing ideas off of each other, chance meetings that lead to new things, etc.

I mean think about it: If there is any industry in the world where workers don't need to be sitting at desks next to each other it's the tech industry. Yet they all home in on Silicon Valley. There's a reason for that -- the critical mass is good for business, and the more, the merrier. It's why businesses of all sorts tend to cluster -- the music industry in LA or hedge funds in Greenwich CT are classic examples. To cut a record or invest some money you don't NEED to be near anyone else who does it. But birds of a feather flock together. Always have and always will.

I have no idea where or how G will expand, but I do agree that it's pretty speculative to say that all their additional real estate will house the maximum 30,000 workers it theoretically could.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 12:45 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,736 posts, read 16,350,818 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by citylove101 View Post
-- the critical mass is good for business, and the more, the merrier. It's why businesses of all sorts tend to cluster -- .
And good heaven knows what's good for business should always be considered over what's good for the rest of the host community, eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 12:59 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
136 posts, read 196,937 times
Reputation: 193
I'm curious to see at what point Highways 101 and 280, the commuting corridors between SV and SF, get saturated. Highway 101 is a tough commute now. At some point, no matter how many Google buses the tech companies provide for their proverbial "young engineers who want to live in SF," the highways will come to a standstill. Even commuting by private bus will be a big hassle.

Then what happens? Will Google deliver its employees to and from work in drones?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top