Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2016, 01:15 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,463,364 times
Reputation: 1886

Advertisements

Will High Speed Rail Turn The Central Valley Into A Bay Area Bedroom Community? | Valley Public Radio
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2016, 11:39 AM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,399,956 times
Reputation: 11042
It will make Los Banos more of a bedroom community than it already is. Places further east from that, we'll see. "High Speed" is a bit of a misnomer - from about Gilroy onward they are not going to be moving much faster than CalTrain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Liminal Space
1,023 posts, read 1,551,908 times
Reputation: 1324
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
It will make Los Banos more of a bedroom community than it already is. Places further east from that, we'll see. "High Speed" is a bit of a misnomer - from about Gilroy onward they are not going to be moving much faster than CalTrain.
There won't be a stop in Los Banos - it's actually specifically prohibited by legislation. So it probably won't have much effect there.

California Streets and Highways Code 2704.09 (d):
"The total number of stations to be served by high-speed trains for all of the corridors described in
subdivision (b) of Section 2704.04 shall not exceed 24. There shall be no station between the Gilroy station and the Merced station."

I'm not sure you're right that there will be no speed improvements beyond Caltrain speed north of Gilroy. I've read that the commute time from Madera to SJ would be 40 minutes. If that's true, that would be pretty revolutionary in terms of opening up commute possibilities. It would be faster to get to work from Madera than South SJ or Fremont for many work locations!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 04:08 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,399,956 times
Reputation: 11042
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentobox34 View Post
There won't be a stop in Los Banos - it's actually specifically prohibited by legislation. So it probably won't have much effect there.

California Streets and Highways Code 2704.09 (d):
"The total number of stations to be served by high-speed trains for all of the corridors described in
subdivision (b) of Section 2704.04 shall not exceed 24. There shall be no station between the Gilroy station and the Merced station."

I'm not sure you're right that there will be no speed improvements beyond Caltrain speed north of Gilroy. I've read that the commute time from Madera to SJ would be 40 minutes. If that's true, that would be pretty revolutionary in terms of opening up commute possibilities. It would be faster to get to work from Madera than South SJ or Fremont for many work locations!
OK, so scratch Los Banos.

I would be highly skeptical regarding the 40 minutes Madera to SJ claim. Granted speeds inbound from Gilroy may be a bit higher than Cal Train but not greatly so. I'm expecting typical speeds for express trains on electrified urban systems such as NYC, London, Tokyo, et al.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 04:20 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,909,384 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
OK, so scratch Los Banos.

I would be highly skeptical regarding the 40 minutes Madera to SJ claim. Granted speeds inbound from Gilroy may be a bit higher than Cal Train but not greatly so. I'm expecting typical speeds for express trains on electrified urban systems such as NYC, London, Tokyo, et al.
I'm sure people will fight it. Like they have fought everything with HSR (because heaven forbid we bring the region into the late 20th century infrastructure wise...). But would be pretty great if it operates at it's theoretical in that corridor.

I understand the concerns of operating at high speeds along the peninsula where it's running through crowded/built up areas (although as someone that lives within 3 blocks of the train tracks, and has a great view of them from my window, I say bring them on!I YIMBY?); but south of SJ should hopefully be operating pretty quickly.

If it does, that really opens up some central valley locations to jobs in SJ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 08:12 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,399,956 times
Reputation: 11042
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
I'm sure people will fight it. Like they have fought everything with HSR (because heaven forbid we bring the region into the late 20th century infrastructure wise...). But would be pretty great if it operates at it's theoretical in that corridor.

I understand the concerns of operating at high speeds along the peninsula where it's running through crowded/built up areas (although as someone that lives within 3 blocks of the train tracks, and has a great view of them from my window, I say bring them on!I YIMBY?); but south of SJ should hopefully be operating pretty quickly.

If it does, that really opens up some central valley locations to jobs in SJ.
For the areas between Madera and Gilroy I'd expect them to run at maximum safe speeds for the grades and curves in question. I'm guessing the average would be something like 130. From Gilroy to the SJ City Limit I'd expect something comparable to Metro North electrics - what's that, maybe 90? Then from there to Diridon probably 80ish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,140,888 times
Reputation: 7997
The proponents of the train no doubt are anti-sprawl yet they market the train to a state that is 400B in debt with the promise of...more sprawl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 11:25 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,883,295 times
Reputation: 116153
Let's wait and see if the thing ever gets built at all. By the time it does (if it does), the central valley may have run out of water and become depopulated, anyway.


Really, at this point CA is facing much more pressing needs for its money. Desal, sea level rise mitigation, increased firefighting needs, to name a few.

Last edited by Ruth4Truth; 06-11-2016 at 11:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 11:44 AM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,909,384 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
For the areas between Madera and Gilroy I'd expect them to run at maximum safe speeds for the grades and curves in question. I'm guessing the average would be something like 130. From Gilroy to the SJ City Limit I'd expect something comparable to Metro North electrics - what's that, maybe 90? Then from there to Diridon probably 80ish.
Yeah, Metro North in NY operates at a max of 89 - that would probably be good for the Gilroy to SJ stretch. From SJ to SF, the Caltrain speed (79) is probably realistic, although it'd be nice if it could operate a little faster in small stretches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 02:29 PM
 
4,369 posts, read 3,723,213 times
Reputation: 2479
I predict the HSR will be an expensive boondoggle . Might as well give me the tax money. I'll give back better returns with an sp 500 index fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top