U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 01-11-2010, 04:27 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
1,286 posts, read 1,158,841 times
Reputation: 637
All the newer apartments are in SOMA/Mission bay and Potrero Hill. In my opinion all of them are outrageously overpriced. This is even more weird because these neighborhoods are not as lively and fun as many other parts of the city. Parts of Potrero is outright dangerous and look very run-down/industrial. I have no clue why people so much rent to live here...maybe the easy commute or the relatively sunnier weather...But I guess the biggest reason is these are the only places that some modern amenities. In other parts of the city you cant get those even if you pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 01-11-2010, 10:12 PM
hsw
 
2,066 posts, read 3,257,673 times
Reputation: 1276
It's all relative

Many yuppies in SF (esp those in finance industry) started their careers in Manhattan, so SF is about 30-40% cheaper in rentals of upscale newer condos; has cheap, spacious pkg garages everywhere at offices/condos and valet pkg in front of relevant restaurants (unlike Manhattan); commutes to offices in MenloPk or SV on 280 are some of fastest in world (compare painful drive from Manhattan to Greenwich)....and SF Peninsula has amazing weather and topography

And any city in world is composed of a few 1000 yuppies and wealthy families....and millions of slum-dwellers and homeless...middle-income families fled to then-newer suburbs like Cupertino or Plano or Naperville or Irvine, etc 25+ yrs ago

But agree, for most middle-income people, daily QOL in suburban Dallas and Houston is superb and arguably better than that of their counterparts in SF region who tend to live in an older, slummier house far from major SV offices...and have same crappy public schools and potholes, despite onerous state income taxes

Ironically, recently heard that many lawyers in Dallas are seeing various wealthy people from SiliconValley, NYC and BevHills closely evaluating tax laws to figure out how to become residents of Dallas and move their offices, to avoid the communist taxes of CA/NY/CT.....life in PrestonHollow is quite civilized, even vs Woodside or PacHts or Greenwich....esp w/no state income tax and a pro-capitalist, anti-communist ethos
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-12-2010, 11:51 AM
 
10,196 posts, read 6,714,809 times
Reputation: 6287
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyadhi01 View Post
Are the apartments and other buildings really that outdated with regards to appliances, amenities, etc? Didn't know it was that bad.
> Yes they are and I don't think it is because of cost. I mean a dishwasher or garbage disposal is pretty cheap in home depot. I think people over here are living in a different era and have some bizarre aversion towards modernity. I was looking at apartment complex where an one bedroom costs $1800/month. When I asked if it had a built-in microwave in the kitchen the manager looked at me like she did not understand what I meant! I don't think you can get washer-dryer connection even in modern parts of the city where a 1-bedroom place is upwards of $2000. Remote controlled gates/garage-doors are pretty rare. Now these are simple things! You can't even get centralized heating here in vast majority of apartments even though it can get cold here throughout the year. So you will have one wall-mounted space-heater that heats one part of the apartment and the bathrooms, kitchens, closets etc will be freezing cold and you can't do anything about it! I basically carry a portable space-heater around. To top it all, the bare minimum appliances you get like a freeze and stove might look like they are picked up from junkyard, unless you chose a recently built complex! The apartment owners here are not familiar with the concept of upgrading. Apartments are like an extortion racket here and the only thing they care about is getting your money. I bet most the apartments here will get demolished in other cities for building-code violations and health hazards.

Maybe its different in the homes of all the rich home-owners live but $2000 a month apartment can be hazardous for your health.
This is typically what happens in an area where there are stiff rent control regulations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-12-2010, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Oakland
329 posts, read 56,475 times
Reputation: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by hsw View Post
It's all relative

Many yuppies in SF (esp those in finance industry) started their careers in Manhattan, so SF is about 30-40% cheaper in rentals of upscale newer condos; has cheap, spacious pkg garages everywhere at offices/condos and valet pkg in front of relevant restaurants (unlike Manhattan); commutes to offices in MenloPk or SV on 280 are some of fastest in world (compare painful drive from Manhattan to Greenwich)....and SF Peninsula has amazing weather and topography

And any city in world is composed of a few 1000 yuppies and wealthy families....and millions of slum-dwellers and homeless...middle-income families fled to then-newer suburbs like Cupertino or Plano or Naperville or Irvine, etc 25+ yrs ago

But agree, for most middle-income people, daily QOL in suburban Dallas and Houston is superb and arguably better than that of their counterparts in SF region who tend to live in an older, slummier house far from major SV offices...and have same crappy public schools and potholes, despite onerous state income taxes

Ironically, recently heard that many lawyers in Dallas are seeing various wealthy people from SiliconValley, NYC and BevHills closely evaluating tax laws to figure out how to become residents of Dallas and move their offices, to avoid the communist taxes of CA/NY/CT.....life in PrestonHollow is quite civilized, even vs Woodside or PacHts or Greenwich....esp w/no state income tax and a pro-capitalist, anti-communist ethos
Could you please provide us with factual data to back your absurd claims? Of course you wont. Most started in Manhattan? Is that so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-12-2010, 11:52 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
799 posts, read 948,183 times
Reputation: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
Listen to mesiodens....Having a car is a hassle in the City.
I think that it depends on your location and situation. Muni doesn't provide the most punctual service and its schedule can be spotty, especially at night. Also, if you work outside of the City (like I do), getting to and from work can be quite painful if you don't live close to a Caltrain or BART station. The only negative that I see is parking, but if you get assigned parking, that pain goes away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-12-2010, 12:15 PM
 
932 posts, read 959,248 times
Reputation: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakland City View Post
Could you please provide us with factual data to back your absurd claims? Of course you wont. Most started in Manhattan? Is that so?
Do you have to start unneccessary fights with everyone?

Does this guy have any friends in real life? lol. I mean seriously wtf.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-12-2010, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Whiteville Tennessee
8,257 posts, read 8,717,067 times
Reputation: 9506
The rents are too high.
Too much fog
Alot of places smell like urine when your walking around
Too many homeless
Too much panhandling
Too much government sticking its nose into peoples business
Not enough good looking women
Too many gays
Too many junkies
Not enough on street parking

Well, you asked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-12-2010, 01:01 PM
 
Location: In them thar hills
6,555 posts, read 6,274,810 times
Reputation: 2815
1) Lack of light rail in northern and NW districts.
2) Extremely poor road connectivity in the N - S direction - no freeway connecting the Peninsula freeways to the GG Bridge.
3) Certain aspects of the overall City governmental structure promote infighting and accord too much power to vocal and extremist fringe groups.
4) Current zoning discourages commercial development at Ocean Beach (e.g. on the upper 40s Avenues).
5) The City and County arrangement (e.g. the past split of SF county into SF City and County and San Mateo County). This hatched numerous, intractable ills and created a schism between City and suburbs (compare and contrast with NYC, DC, LA, fill in the blank).
6) After WW2, when the big growth boom hit at the metro level, other than a small, elite and out of touch group of the very wealthy, most SF natives were not well rooted. When floods of transplants arrived from back East, it was a tsunami that the locals could not resist. Most of the less than wealthy natives fled for the burbs or other metros. Into the vacuum surged some very strange people with very unsettling and at times destructive political, ideological and philosophical notions. What I find is that many of them were misfits back where they came from. If someone is considered a misfit in a cosmopolitan place like NYC, or even most smaller but essentially liberal places back East, I'm sorry, but that is one weird person. The SF which existed socially prior to WW2 was utterly destroyed. Mind you, that SF was still a very liberal, colorful and lively place. But it was 1000% healthier and far more in balance than what's there now. Many natives will understand this one, most newcomers will never get it.
7) Many here seem to be in denial regarding how physically isolated this metro is. Compare with the Eastern Seaboard or even the Gulf Coast and Fall Line.
8) The chance to build the Southern Crossing at a reasonable price was squandered. Now, we'll never see it built. Heck, we can barely keep the Bay Bridge functioning!
9) Tenants have way too many rights (and I write this as someone who only rented in the City and did not buy until leaving for the suburbs).
10) Very poor PR regarding many of the historical items. Beyond obvious things like North Beach, Coit Tower and Cable Cars, vast examples of significant history are poorly documented, signed, PRed so even many residents are unaware of them. Compare and contrast with the East Coast, Europe, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-17-2010, 02:30 AM
 
Location: California
142 posts, read 149,342 times
Reputation: 59
Hey that San Mateo San Francisco County thing in my opinion realley messed up San Francisco. San Francisco could have been bigger, richer, more beautiful and powerful in national and global politics and economics if it had a county hense room to expand. San Francisco would have definetley have annexed a few cities by now and would have not remained at its current and small size of 49 square miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-17-2010, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
267 posts, read 165,577 times
Reputation: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakland City View Post
Could you please provide us with factual data to back your absurd claims? Of course you wont. Most started in Manhattan? Is that so?
Hey, I started in Manhattan and moved to SF, and so did a lot of other people. I was paying $2,000 a month for a studio apartment in Manhattan but was able to upgrade to a much larger one-bedroom apartment for only $1,600 month when I first moved to SF 13 years ago. I even bought a car in SF, which I couldn't afford to own, park, and operate in NYC.

And, yes, many people pay over $10,000 a month in rent to live in nice apartments in the nicer areas of Manhattan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top