One thing that it has going for it is a non-insane rent to buy ratio. For example compare:
4936 Lowry Rd, Union City, CA 94587 - Property Details.
To:
Beautiful 2 bd, 1.5 ba, Townhouse for Rent Quiet Area of Union City (broken link)
The good townhouse costs 177 times the monthly rent of the crappy townhouse. My calculations suggest 180 is a good number in these calculations (for similar properties, the crappy townhouse would need a lot of work here).
That is a lot better than here in Belmont were people think they can put 1bd condos up for sale at 246/250 times monthly rent which to me sounds insane, anyone with half a brain would say no and rent, save the difference and put it to purchase a nicer property in the future, skip the owning a 1bd condo which is just a glorified apartment anyway. In my opinion these people are dilusional btw, thinking they can get tax free $55k for owning a property 3.5 years, on a property they bought for ~315k.
San Bruno has decent condos for sale but still a little (5-10%) overpriced for me, but nowhere are there SFHs for sale for a decent price on the peninsula side, I only have a 5 figure income, so more than 340k is asking for me to be foreclosed on in the future.
I'm in no rush btw, while I do see the cap increase on Fannie Mae pushing rates up while the masses refinance, it is only for 1 year, I do see more foreclosure this year, and a few next year. I have no clue what is going to happen with these Option ARMs though. Either way I don't plan on having a family, and a 2 bd seems fine to me, 3 would be better though.