![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 370,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I recently took a therapy job in Fairfield and will be moving from the midwest. I am thinking of living in Walnut Creek... does anyone know how bad of a commute that would be each day, from WC to Fairfield?
Thanks! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like about 30 miles on 680 and 80. I don't think it would be terrible compared with many other commutes of that length, but it does include a toll bridge so get yourself a FasTrak.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not live in the Fairfield/Vacaville area and skip the $4.60/gal gas plus $80/month bridge toll commute. Fairfield isn't all that bad. Really!!
Traffic does get a little congested between Walnut Creek and the Benicia bridge on I-680, otherwise, the commute is usually OK. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The schools may not be rated as highly as those in Walnut Creek, but they certainly are not bad. Alternately, you can choose Benicia or Davis. Both districts have excellent schools closer the quality found in Walnut Creek, with Davis being on par for the most part, but with less affordable housing than the Travis Unified area. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's the opposite commute direction so as others have already said, it won't be that bad with congestion. It's just the distance and bridge tolls that will add up the cost to commute...
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks! I am a 24 year old, single female, so that was why I was thinking about Walnut Creek. I had heard that there is a younger population there than in the other cities... I'm not too concerned about schools and such because I don't have children. I really appreciate your opinions because I am not at all familiar with the area! THANKS!
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kirwin,
I just had to reply to your message because I am a young therapist myself, about to make the opposite commute ( Fairfield to San Leandro). In addition, I am looking for a place to live that is young and safe. Like other members said, you will be going against traffic. That toll is going to kick your butt, though. Good luck with your new position and finding a place. If you have any questions about the job or the Fairfield/Bay area, let me know! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those who ARE worried about schools, tennis368fan knows his stuff! But since OP is not concerned about that, then WC would be a decent choice. But even though is it "opposite" commute traffic can be unpredictable and certainly expensive with the toll bridge and now gas. It depends WHERE in Fairfield you work, if the job is to the west side of town, all the better. Or, consider Davis--a happening college town if that's your gig, and commute to Fairfield. Or, commute from Dixon, a nondescript overgrown farm town that is cheaper than Davis and closer to Fairfield but still a quick hop to Davis for jollies.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
THANKS everyone. I am leaning towards Vacaville now... any opinions on that?
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Cute little cow town. Much better for your commute. |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|