Quote:
Originally Posted by maddball26
And what are the main differences between San Diego and San Francisco?
|
Assuming you're talking about San Francisco proper, versus the SF Bay Area, there are huge differences. SF is the 2nd most-dense city in the US, after NYC. San Diego is a huge spread-out set of suburbs sprinkled with sometimes-cute downtown areas. A lot of people in SF get by without owning a car, which can be good given the hassle of finding parking. There are people everywhere, and it's pretty mixed, racially. San Diego seemed much more homogeneous (whites and Hispanics) when I was spending time down there.
San Diego has a beach culture, SF doesn't (though surfing is available if you want it). The weather is 5-10 degrees colder in SF. San Diego is part of general Southwest culture. SF is definitely Northern California. People wear more clothes here (layers, always layers). I think the biking is better around here.
Politically, "San Francisco Liberal" is a title all its own. San Diego is much more conservative.
It's more expensive to live here (not counting places like Del Mar). There's a real restaurant and food culture here, and in the Bay Area in general. There's more energy here, or, at least, it's packed into a smaller area.
SF has both a pretentious side and a provincial side. The former can be fun if you don't take it seriously; the latter is kinda disappointing, but you can work around it.
I could probably keep going, but... what parts in particular do you care about?
_S