|

03-14-2009, 07:47 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Illinois
2,370 posts, read 635,858 times
|
|
Should Oakland-Fremont-Hayward area be a separate sub-forum?
Should we separate Oakland-Fremont-Hayward area from San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City area? This poll will be open for four days.
|
|

03-14-2009, 11:10 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
3,866 posts, read 3,082,238 times
Reputation: 572
|
|
|
No.. San Francisco/peninsula and the East Bay are too interdependent on each other. The East Bay is so often where people will choose because they can't or don't want to pay peninsula housing prices, or because it doesn't offer them what they want. You'd be moving threads from the SF forum to the East Bay forum constantly.
|
|

03-14-2009, 02:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: São Paulo
8,440 posts, read 4,964,578 times
Reputation: 1786
|
|
|
Although I would like to see a separate East Bay forum-it seems to me that most of the folks who ask about a place to live in SF actually get answers recommending the East Bay instead of SF or the Peninsula.
|
|

03-14-2009, 09:48 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento
9,568 posts, read 4,666,023 times
Reputation: 1965
|
|
|
I vote no, folks seeking relocation information would likely want to consider this within the context of the overall metro area.
|
|

03-14-2009, 10:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East Bay, CA
916 posts, read 472,555 times
Reputation: 448
|
|
|
I find it odd that a city of over 400,000 people doesn't have its own forum.
Here's the problem with the idea that 'since people looking to move to SF often get the advice to move to Oakland instead.' Can you not still give this same advice? I would imagine that people would subscribe to both forums and receive both news. If they don't, I don't see why they couldn't begin reading the Oakland forum when a SF person says it might be a good idea for them.
Ultimately, I don't care because I read both and if I want to narrow my search, I'll simply search the forum, however, but the neat, slightly OCD in me can't stand that "San Francisco" also silently includes one of the larger cities in the country. Why not rename it "San Francisco - Oakland," etc?
|
|

03-15-2009, 05:30 AM
|
|
Vitameatavegamin! It's so tasty too!!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Land of 36 Area Codes
1,511 posts, read 1,627,197 times
Reputation: 555
|
|
|
I believe that either the East Bay should get its own forum, or ALL of the Bay Area should be recombined into one forum (e.g., eliminate the San Jose forum).
|
|

03-15-2009, 10:55 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rolando, San Diego CA 92115
4,902 posts, read 4,900,438 times
Reputation: 1147
|
|
|
I also feel there should be 1 forum for all of the bay area. I would support an SF forum and a combined East/South bay forum as well.
|
|

03-15-2009, 07:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bay Area
69 posts, read 44,655 times
Reputation: 27
|
|
|
We should have an SF-Peninsula Forum, a San Jose/South Bay forum, and an Oakland/East Bay forum, or something like that.
|
|

03-15-2009, 11:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
1,528 posts, read 599,315 times
Reputation: 573
|
|
|
I, too, find it odd that Oakland-Fremont-Hayward doesn't have its own forum. It has many more people than San Francisco, Marin, and the Peninsula combined, yet gets lumped in with San Francisco.
|
|

03-16-2009, 02:42 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco
852 posts, read 544,584 times
Reputation: 324
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger
I, too, find it odd that Oakland-Fremont-Hayward doesn't have its own forum. It has many more people than San Francisco, Marin, and the Peninsula combined, yet gets lumped in with San Francisco.
|
It gets "lumped in" for starters, because it's part of the "San Francisco Bay Area," of which San Francisco is the historical center, not to mention by far the most famous of the three largest cities. The Bay Area has 3 major cities in very close proximity (especially SF and Oakland, which are only 7 miles or so apart), and they and every other smaller city and town all rely on each other to a pretty high degree.
It makes sense for people to want all individual cities to have their own forums, but in the context of the Bay Area, it probably actually makes less sense. I say just rename it the SF-Oakland forum, or make one Bay Area forum.
If Oakland gets it's own forum though, shouldn't places like Fresno and Long Beach get them too? Both those cities are larger than Oakland, and Long Beach is in the same boat in that it's also right next to a larger and much more well-known city (LA).
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|