|

05-17-2009, 09:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
0 posts, read 169,705 times
Reputation: 10
|
|
Is San Francisco the best city to live in the United States?
What do you think?
|
|

05-17-2009, 11:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
113 posts, read 81,510 times
Reputation: 44
|
|
|
I have not been to all the cities in the US to make that decision...but I do think it is a nice place to live
|
|

05-17-2009, 11:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bay Area,CA/San Juan,PR
294 posts, read 239,664 times
Reputation: 81
|
|
|
You need to ask this in the City to City forum. That way you get different views from people..
|
|

05-18-2009, 02:53 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
227 posts, read 119,115 times
Reputation: 46
|
|
|
It all depends what you want... In many ways it's an excellent place to live, on the flipside of the coin it would fail to meet the criteria for many families.
|
|

05-18-2009, 03:03 AM
|
|
ichigo ichie 1 time 1 meeting unprecedented
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: southern california
27,637 posts, read 10,967,905 times
Reputation: 17943
|
|
|
without any doubt as long as you have wheelbarrows full of money.
|
|

05-18-2009, 04:00 AM
|
|
I live in a tropical paradise in my imagination.
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: northern california
462 posts, read 410,397 times
Reputation: 109
|
|
|
I would say no, it's not because not everyone is going to enjoy living here. The 'best city to live' is subjective. Depends on the person.
|
|

05-18-2009, 11:00 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
9,053 posts, read 5,603,155 times
Reputation: 1939
|
|
|
Overall, I would say San Francisco is the most complete City-in the sense that it is a truly vibrant urban environment with all the amenities AND is naturally stunning.
Seattle would be next, but the quality of its urban vibrancy(although good) is several pegs below SF imHo.
Many cities have great urban cores, but a not so hot setting.
Other cities seem to be blessed with natural setting, but their downtowns, well, suck.
SF combines both elements in a way that I really havent seen anywhere else in the US.
|
|

05-18-2009, 11:16 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
10,570 posts, read 5,092,068 times
Reputation: 1935
|
|
|
How can anyone really say what is the best city in the country. I don't care how much you think of a place, there is no such thing as the "best" city. It depends on what an individaul is looking for in a home. SFO has a lot to offer, but has many problems as well. NYC is also an awesome place, but so is Bentonville, AR for the right person, or Austin and how about Dallas, Tampa, or Kansas City, Kansas?
Nita
|
|

05-18-2009, 12:08 PM
|
|
Members Only Jacket
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Redwood City, California
4,125 posts, read 2,551,431 times
Reputation: 1127
|
|
I have lived in Miami, Orlando, Tampa, Washington D.C., New York City, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Singapore and Sydney, Australia and have been to numerous other cities around the world.
San Francisco has everything...all in a very small area.
If you count the entire Bay Area, access to: Tahoe, Napa, Yosemite, Santa Cruz...it is tough to beat.
#1 IMO.
Last edited by Mach50; 05-18-2009 at 12:18 PM..
|
|

05-18-2009, 02:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In them thar hills
2,549 posts, read 1,033,152 times
Reputation: 701
|
|
|
No. For the average person, it is not. Great place for singles and DINKs, with lot of money. But for the average person, there are better places to live, from an overall perspective of optimal living.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|