Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Jose
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2013, 10:03 AM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,149,957 times
Reputation: 3631

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by crescent22 View Post
Why would you take 101 over 280 from SF to SJ?
Because of the heavy stretch between Daly City and San Bruno, the carpool lanes, and the fact that 280 is many miles longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2013, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
6,288 posts, read 11,778,248 times
Reputation: 3369
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonarrat View Post
Because of the heavy stretch between Daly City and San Bruno, the carpool lanes, and the fact that 280 is many miles longer.
But 280 consistently has less traffic and is much prettier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
1,963 posts, read 3,043,105 times
Reputation: 2430
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonarrat View Post
Take 101, 85, and 17. Carpool lane on 101 starts in Belmont and continues down to the flyover ramp to 85 in Mountain View. After that it's smooth sailing.
I live in the south bay and I would *never* take that route, let alone at 9AM during the week. 101 is a *madhouse* at 9-9:30 in the morning, even if there's no accident.

Definitely I-280 to 85 to 17. And check traffic reports before leaving ( Traffic « CBS San Francisco ) and listen to AM-740 for updates (if you don't have a smartphone).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 03:10 PM
 
6,802 posts, read 6,713,845 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
If you take the 280, it's like being repeatedly punched in the kidney.

If you take the 101, it's more like a rusty needle shoved up your pee hole.
So you are generally ok with the commute if you have a catheter and a well paying job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 10:39 PM
 
13,211 posts, read 21,825,412 times
Reputation: 14123
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonarrat View Post
and the fact that 280 is many miles longer.
It's 6.2 miles longer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo666 View Post
I live in the south bay and I would *never* take that route, let alone at 9AM during the week. 101 is a *madhouse* at 9-9:30 in the morning, even if there's no accident.

Definitely I-280 to 85 to 17.
Ditto. 280 is always preferable over 101.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Jose

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top