U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Jose
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 10-27-2008, 10:30 AM
 
1 posts, read 3,304 times
Reputation: 10
Default Why is San Jose cheaper than other cities..?

I am moving to the Silicon Valley next year. I will be looking for a house to buy at that point. But...

It seems that San Jose is much cheaper than say, Cupertino, Sunnyvale, Palo Alto and Mountanview, even though these cities are more 'remote' than San Jose which seems to offer more amenities...

It's not like SH has more crime - I looked up the crime data, and saw that all of these cities are all very safe. Nor is it due to less jobs.. there are planty.

Is SH cheaper because of other reasons..? Airplane noise, so-so school system, etc..?

Please let me know... Big Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 10-27-2008, 10:35 AM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
6,294 posts, read 12,359,211 times
Reputation: 1979
A few reasons:

1) Traffic. Every major street and every freeway in San Jose is logjammed most of the time, almost as bad as Los Angeles.
2) Older housing stock. If a neighborhood has an abundance of 1920's bungalows or condo conversions built in the '60s, then it's going to depress property values.
3) Perception of crime and gang activity in many corners of the city. Those that lack the perception have higher property values.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-27-2008, 11:17 AM
 
60 posts, read 228,741 times
Reputation: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonarrat View Post
A few reasons:

1) Traffic. Every major street and every freeway in San Jose is logjammed most of the time, almost as bad as Los Angeles.
2) Older housing stock. If a neighborhood has an abundance of 1920's bungalows or condo conversions built in the '60s, then it's going to depress property values.
3) Perception of crime and gang activity in many corners of the city. Those that lack the perception have higher property values.
That sounds right except for the part about 1920's bungalows depressing property values. I actually understood that 1920's homes are actually highly desireable and increase property values. Willow Glen area of San Jose has many 1920's homes, and has one of the property values in San Jose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-27-2008, 12:39 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,299 posts, read 7,959,838 times
Reputation: 2276
Racists

I say that half-jokingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-28-2008, 06:27 PM
hsw
 
2,066 posts, read 3,268,423 times
Reputation: 1277
Schools, traffic, air quality, heat, more arid terrain than leafier mid-Peninsula (SJ tends to have negative look of inland valleys in LA region)....older houses tend to be less seismically sound (CA is a quake zone)...distance from SFO for frequent business travelers...

Most in SV w/a few bucks seem to prefer to live in PaloAlto or one of the suburbs West of 280 (Woodside or Los Altos Hills) over anything deeper South in SV or nr the 101....

Crowd in PA area tends to be better educated (more Stanford and Harvard alums) than crowd in SouthBay suburbs...parents in PA area tend to be more education-focused high achievers themselves than many parents in SouthBay, w/implications for culture of any schools (public or private) that their kids attend
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-28-2008, 09:49 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
6,294 posts, read 12,359,211 times
Reputation: 1979
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmkarr View Post
That sounds right except for the part about 1920's bungalows depressing property values. I actually understood that 1920's homes are actually highly desireable and increase property values. Willow Glen area of San Jose has many 1920's homes, and has one of the property values in San Jose.
Maybe the victorians, but most of San Jose's neighborhoods were not so desirable in those days and so the homes were pretty spartan. If you built a brand-new house on San Jose's White Road, which has a lot of dated housing stock, it wouldn't hold the same value as if it was on King Street which has some newer development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-29-2008, 07:32 PM
 
2,191 posts, read 4,448,245 times
Reputation: 1064
I'd have to ask which areas of San Jose are you looking at? If you are looking at a house for $350K in east S.J., then comparing that to a house in Cupertino, that's like comparing apples to bowling balls.

If you are looking at the the average home value in San Jose, you have to realize that takes into account all areas of San Jose. The good, the bad and the ugly.

Schools are a big factor in home values in the San Jose area. Areas with good schools demand a much higher price than areas with not so great schools.

There are some really great areas of all the places listed. No matter what city in the area, the nice areas are going to cost much more than the others.

Cupertino and Palo Alto (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH EAST PALO ALTO), are extremely expensive. Sunnyvale and M.V. will be less expensive than those two. I suggest you make a list of the most important factors and visit the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-29-2008, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Seattle area, via Bay Area and Phoenix
1,486 posts, read 3,276,937 times
Reputation: 509
Yep, San Jose is much larger and diverse than the other cities. Buried in the averages are relatively expensive areas, like Almaden Valley and Willow Glen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-31-2008, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
9,854 posts, read 7,913,726 times
Reputation: 11046
Because it's just a bigger version of Campbell. Really, the Milwaukee of the West.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 10-31-2008, 08:58 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,299 posts, read 7,959,838 times
Reputation: 2276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexus View Post
Because it's just a bigger version of Campbell. Really, the Milwaukee of the West.
It's the UFC to your old boxing ****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Jose

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top