U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Gilbert, AZ
3,172 posts, read 5,360,297 times
Reputation: 1419

Advertisements

From what I read, at elevations of 3000 ft or higher, ionization type smoke detectors are more prone to false alarms than at lower elevations; photoelectric type smoke detectors are preferred for high elevations.

However, what bothers me is that it seems most homebuilders are unaware of the problems of ionization type smoke detetctors at high elevations, as most homes (both older and newer) that I have seen in my area (Albuquerque) are using ionization type smoke detectors. My house was built in 1991 and came with Dicon ionization smoke detectors. We eventually replaced them with First Alert/BRK photoelectric smoke detectors.

I assume the reason that most homebuilders in my area use ionization type smoke detectors is simply because they cost less than photoelectric type smoke detectors. However, I personally think that people in general should be more aware of the higher probability of false alarms from ionization tyope smoke detectors at higher elevations.

Does anyone have any thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $99,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top