U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 06:49 AM
 
19,562 posts, read 20,839,092 times
Reputation: 7065
2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 05-21-2011, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
33,145 posts, read 23,680,937 times
Reputation: 21657
OK, then, express this algebraically:

You want to add 9+3, and multiply that by 2, and then divide 48 by that product. You will get 2. How do you express what you just did?

48÷2(9+3) is the only way.

You get 288 is by dividing 48 by 2, and then multiplying that by the sum of 9 and 3. How do you express that?

(48÷2)(9+3) = 288. Not the same.

The correct answer is 2. Now I remember why I loved algebra. It taught me to think, which turned out in later life to be very useful.

Last edited by jtur88; 05-21-2011 at 08:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
1,153 posts, read 795,925 times
Reputation: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
OK, then, express this algebraically:

You want to add 9+3, and multiply that by 2, and then divide 48 by that product. You will get 2. How do you express what you just did?

48÷2(9+3) is the only way.
LMAO what??? If you want to get 2, the correct expression is 48÷(2(9+3)).

Quote:

You get 288 is by dividing 48 by 2, and then multiplying that by the sum of 9 and 3. How do you express that?

(48÷2)(9+3) = 288. Not the same.
The correct expression for 288 is 48÷2(9+3), because you go from left to right after parenthesis.

Quote:
The correct answer is 2. Now I remember why I loved algebra. It taught me to think, which turned out in later life to be very useful.
Your algebra fails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
25,896 posts, read 40,983,045 times
Reputation: 14804
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
OK, then, express this algebraically:

You want to add 9+3, and multiply that by 2, and then divide 48 by that product. You will get 2. How do you express what you just did?

48÷2(9+3) is the only way.

You get 288 is by dividing 48 by 2, and then multiplying that by the sum of 9 and 3. How do you express that?

(48÷2)(9+3) = 288. Not the same.

The correct answer is 2.
Now I remember why I loved algebra. It taught me to think, which turned out in later life to be very useful.
Are you sure?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in northern Alabama
9,385 posts, read 16,731,472 times
Reputation: 10260
It boils down to weak syntax and using an inferred operator. Those who take the inferred operator as having to hold to the left to right processing order will get one answer, those who tend to group before doing a left to right order will get the other. It doesn't happen as much in math as in everyday language. I always get a kick out of the signs and advertising that tout "Big Baby Sale." If you don't buy in to the convention that there is an unsaid word, you go looking for babies to buy.

Although the 288 version is technically correct, it is sloppy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Chicago
2,906 posts, read 2,049,630 times
Reputation: 1625
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2

What's so hard about that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:56 AM
 
7,922 posts, read 4,002,096 times
Reputation: 5892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2

What's so hard about that?
It's wrong because after you do the parentheses (9+3), you work left to right. The expression would be better if you added the parentheses, but in algebra they are not necessary.

48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

If you want 2 the correct expression would be
48÷(2(9+3))

The Language of Algebra - Order of operations - First Glance

Quote:
When expressions have more than one operation, we have to follow rules for the order of operations:

First do all operations that lie inside parentheses.
Next, do any work with exponents or radicals.
Working from left to right, do all multiplication and division.
Finally, working from left to right, do all addition and subtraction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
1,153 posts, read 795,925 times
Reputation: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2

What's so hard about that?
After you get to 48÷2(12) you have to do 48÷2 first, because division comes before multiplication in this case.
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

You'd get 2 only if you had 48÷(2(9+3)) - in math if you want to express division as a denominator you have to use extra parenthesis.

48÷(2(9+3))
48÷(2*12)
48÷24
2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
25,896 posts, read 40,983,045 times
Reputation: 14804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2

What's so hard about that?

2 + 2 = 5; What's so hard about that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 02:01 PM
 
14,418 posts, read 7,248,499 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
OK, then, express this algebraically:

You want to add 9+3, and multiply that by 2, and then divide 48 by that product. You will get 2. How do you express what you just did?

48÷2(9+3) is the only way.

You get 288 is by dividing 48 by 2, and then multiplying that by the sum of 9 and 3. How do you express that?

(48÷2)(9+3) = 288. Not the same.

The correct answer is 2. Now I remember why I loved algebra. It taught me to think, which turned out in later life to be very useful.
Wow. You just lost all credibility on this board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top