U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:44 PM
 
14,139 posts, read 6,893,328 times
Reputation: 5891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
Where does that extra parenthesis come from?
It is not in the original question.
Exactly! There are no extra parenthesis.

Since the original equation is NOT 48/(2(9+3)), it cannot mean

48
2(9+3)

The original equation is 48/2(9+3), which means

48 *(9+3)
2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 05-21-2011, 11:55 PM
 
585 posts, read 410,850 times
Reputation: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Exactly! There are no extra parenthesis.

Since the original equation is NOT 48/(2(9+3)), it cannot mean

48
2(9+3)

The original equation is 48/2(9+3), which means

48 *(9+3)
2
Correct...

Alacran u keep thinking the answer is 2, that means u r putting the extra parenthesis on the equation, but since the equation doesn't have the parenthesis the this means is 288.
Just go to the link that I provided, the calculator, and do it...
Or any calculator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Chicago
2,897 posts, read 1,994,316 times
Reputation: 1612
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 05:53 AM
 
585 posts, read 410,850 times
Reputation: 172
the calculator on the right is right...
The calculator on the left is wrong.. just put it on excel or on the online calculator, also you should check the settings on the one on the left..
I have the same calculator on the left and it gives me 288, go figure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Chicago
2,897 posts, read 1,994,316 times
Reputation: 1612
Exactly.
Depending on how you set the calculator.
Both ways are correct. It can be interpreted in either of the ways you showed up there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
25,695 posts, read 40,175,602 times
Reputation: 14504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
Both ways are correct.
Both answers are not correct. There can't be different answers for the same problem.

If the answers are different then the equations are different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Chicago
2,897 posts, read 1,994,316 times
Reputation: 1612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
Both answers are not correct. There can't be different answers for the same problem.

If the answers are different then the equations are different.
The way the problem is written can be re arranged in different ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
25,695 posts, read 40,175,602 times
Reputation: 14504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
The way the problem is written can be re arranged in different ways.

Then they are different problems, otherwise the equalities would be the same. There is only one correct process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
32,718 posts, read 23,085,028 times
Reputation: 21229
It's a faulty expression, probably composed by somebody intending to create an enigma. Any proper algebraist would have expressed it in one of the following two ways:

(48/2)(9+3) = 288

Or

48/[2(9+3)]=2

That's what parentheses are for, and are an integral part of algebraic expression. Leaving out the necessary parentheses is as fatal as leaving out the + sign.

If the person who wrote the expression doesn't know how to properly use algebraic terms, he has no business demanding that others guess what he means. The symbol " ÷ " is inappropriate in an algebraic expression anyway, it should have been " / ", and that itself is proof that the problem was composed by someone who didn't know anything about algebra. But nevertheless, it is badly and ambiguously parenthesized, and it is the responsibility of the person writing the equation to do it correctly and unambiguously, and whoever that was, failed. Proof of that is the mere fact that we are having this discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 05-22-2011, 08:47 AM
 
830 posts, read 505,333 times
Reputation: 803
jtur88 is right, the problem is written in poor fashion. It is intentionally written to be vague and cause confusion. Nobody with a strong background in math would have ever written the expression that way. That is what parentheses, brackets and braces are used for...to provide clarity on how the problem was intended to be interpreted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top